Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.11s
Amicus Curiae Brief — White v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Jd. at 399. … Jd. at 399-400. B.
502 U.S. 346Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Julien Simmons, Petitioner v. Consumer Assistance Group, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 14, 2024
United States, 955 F.3d 399, 403 (5th Cir. 2020, and Life Partners Inc. v. … United States, 955 F.3d 399, 403 (5th Cir. 2020, and Life Partners Inc. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joseph D. Blueford, Petitioner v. Timothy Hooper, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 6, 2020
Rule 24. Briefs on the Merits: In General 1. … ROA 399-400.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Young v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 90 S. … Equally important in this regard, standards of trial 24.
410 U.S. 967Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Wendlinger v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1945
Waldman, 53 Fed. (2nd) 24. That ease. … Waldman, 53 Fed. (2d) 24.”
324 U.S. 882Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gary Ray Bowles, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 8, 2018
State, 218 So.3d 399, 400 (Fla. 2017)(sentence final in 1993; see Gaskin v. … Bar No. 292524 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Telephone: (904) 399-1966 Fax: (904) 399-4866 legal@attorneyshea.com Atty. for Gary Ray Bowles CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify
Supplemental Brief — Gerstein v. Pugh
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1975
Ramirez, US. , @ SL. 2655, 2675-2679, 41 L.Ed.2d 551, 557-580 (June 24, 1974). … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970).
420 U.S. 103Petitioners Brief — Mancusi v. Stubbs
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972
Green, 399 U. S149 Bs eee a 38. me Cdinbers v. Maroney, 399 U. 8. 42 ints ‘ee Sm . 2 = =—Datton- We = iy ene Tr. s. auecinionmns = 8. ct. … (399 : |. US. at 53). Nor has such a charge been made as‘té re- -spondent Stubbs’ ‘first trial counsel.
408 U.S. 204Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Max Fontes, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 31, 2025
New York, 399 U.S. 117, 12223 (1970) (Harlan, J., concurring in the result in Williams). … This error in approach was “not just wrong”—it was 24 “egregiously wrong.” Id. at 121, 132 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring in part).
Reply Brief — Blanton v. North Las Vegas
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1989
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) was relied upon as authority, which case preserved the “nature of the offense” test. Baldwin, 399 U.S. at 69, n.6. … Craner, 652 F.2d 23, 24-27 (CA9 1981); United States v. Woods, 450 F.Supp. 1335, 1340 (Md. 1978); Brady v. Blair, 427 F.Supp. 5, 9 (SD Ohio 1976), all DWI jury trial cases.
489 U.S. 538Opposition Brief — Butler v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1971
New York, 399 U.S. 66.(1970), should not be applied, retroactively. As a conseqilence,.a conv iction for a misdemeanor, punishable by a maximum, . ] ° P * n + 4 . L - . ~ . ° . : P . … result with re- spect to criminal contempt proceedings, holding that a re- quest for a jury trial should have been granted since. the offense was serious and not petty as shown by the punish- ment of 24
404 U.S. 847Appendix — Investment Company Institute v. Camp
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1971
Desch 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 Leif H. Olsen 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 E. Sherman Adams 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 John B. … Arnold 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 H. Lansing Clute 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 G. A. Costanzo 399 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 E.
401 U.S. 617Petition — ARMSTRONG v. FLORIDA (No. 83-5145)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
D, infra, 36a-45a) is reported at 399 So.24 953. TE ; J : a , ee JURISDICTION The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida was entered on January 20, 1983. … sentence if no mitigating circumstances had been established (399 So. 24 at 962-963). 122.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Colgrove v. Battin
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Florida, 399 U. S. 78 (1970). .4, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24 Winsby v. John Oster Manufacturing Company, 336 Fed. Supp. 663 (W. D. Pa., 1972).............. 18, 20, 24 Wirtz v. … Ed. 24 446 (1970).
413 U.S. 149Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ronald Jeremy Hyatt, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2021
On March 24, 2021, the California Supreme Court denied Hyatt’s Petition for Review and application for stay in Hyatt v. Superior Court, No. S267435. … Review was denied on March 24, 2021. App. 1a. REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION 1.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fabian Hernan Hernandez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 4, 2026
Payne, 341 F.3d at 399. … Payne, 341 F.3d at 399.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rivera v. Sheriff
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970)? 2. … Cir. 1992) 15 437 U.S. 82 (1978) a2, 15, i9 ‘ 399 U.S. 267 (1970) a2, 19, 20 n j P 497 U.S. 639 (1990) 15 U.S. Const., 4th Amendment 24 U.S.
527 U.S. 1022Petition for Writ of Certiorari — David Louis Whitehead, Petitioner v. Netflix, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2017
LLP et al. 5:12-cv-399.) Plaintiff requests perm ission to file this current suit. … (Record Documents 21, 23, 24, 26, 27 and 32).
Respondents Brief in Opposition — H. B. Ives Co. v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1962
§ 1122, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. Ann. § 11-1122 ....... 4,7 "$127, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. Ann. $ 11-1127 00.0. § 1132, 24 Purdon’s Pa. Stat. … S..399 (1958), fod rom .
370 U.S. 904Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
FPC, 399 F.2d. 953 (D.C. Cir. 1968). … Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 24 FERC 4 61,395 (1983).
493 U.S. 964
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.