Documents

Respondents Brief — Muniz v. Hoffman

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1975

nae ad Rell LE Daan patel SE Ae serene alee Mad 6h YAN oeleay Page "link Diietivdhudnan Gnas nk kcabads ces 27 I UI is oe oa oe 27 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 84 Stat Pa obi bas is whacked … , but the penalty was raised in the Clean Air Act Amend- ments of 1970, 84 Stat. 1700, to $10,000 for each viola- ~ 4 None of the foregoing statutory provisions places any ceil- ing on the total amount

Amicus Curiae Brief — RMS of Georgia, LLC, dba Choice Refrigerants, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2026

Circuit then doubled the constitutional harm by supplying an “intelligible principle” for the AIM Act transplanted from Title VI of the Clean Air Act. Pet.13–14. … The AIM Act is as deficient as the “hot oil” act was in Panama Refining. The AIM Act simply authorizes the EPA to phase down HFCs within a 15-year period.

Transcript of Record — Stilz v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1925

L. 851), amended by the act of July 1, 1918, chapt. 114 (40 Stat. 704). X. … nd If we are correct in the foreging conclusion, the defendant is r- innocent of infringement, The defendant in its devices does. not, the | and has not for a period antedating the granting of plaintiff's

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Caleb Bohmker, et al., Petitioners v. Oregon, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 18, 2019

, National Environmental Policy Act, and Clean Water Act. … See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq.; Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.; Nat. Environ, Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq.; Oregon Air Toxics Program, Oregon Admin.

Respondents Brief — Eastern Oregon Mining Association, et al., Petitioners v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 8, 2020

Clean Water Act is interpreted. … The EPA has consistently interpreted the Clean Water Act the same way.

Appendix — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988

Some of these commenters believe that cable op- erators have an incentive to keep new stations off the air. … These commenters contend that unless new stations are protected, the nation’s system of over-the-air broadcast television will be jeopardized.

Reply Brief — Barbara Kowal, Petitioner v. Department of Justice, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 28, 2025

(cleaned up). The public-domain doctrine makes the trial court the gatekeeper for access to its records. … But such considerations are irrelevant: Whether disclosure is warranted “must turn on the nature of the requested document and its relationship to the basic purpose of the Freedom of Information Act to

Amicus Curiae Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Variance requests must be filed with the EPA, and the public is invited to comment (40 C.F.R. § 403.13(g), (j)). … , on the 1977 amendments (A Legislative History of the Clean Water Act of 1977, Cong.

Appendix — Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Brock

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987

Failure to respond to these comments is, at bottom, proba- tive of nothing. … (b) “Air Carrier’ means an air carrier certificated under Section 401 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1371).

Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Grants Pass, Oregon, Petitioner v. Gloria Johnson, et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2024

Water Act for nearly 20 years). 1. … , the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, among others—demonstrate that “environmental regulations do increase the price of housing.”

Respondents Brief — EPA v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Bd.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1976

VI, cl. 2 (Supremacy Clause) .................. 12 Federal Statutes: Clean Air Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1676 et seq., e . veticicsicdcces 5 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 86 … and the Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Macon v. City of Orlando

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

The only black City lot/housing inspector, during the period after infarmetion critical of Crlando was published in the Sun, was assigned exclusively to cover Lat Cleaning Cade (LCC") vio- lations … Oscar Bea- chum was the tenant living et Bethune during the relevant time period.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Johnson v. United States (No. 07-9)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987), to determine the controlling opinion. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 107 S. Ct. 3078, 97 L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018

Id., comment c. … Air & Liquid Sys.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — M/V Torvanger v. Quaker Oats Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

The Defendant cleaned the system to the satisfaction of Mit- subishi’s inspector. … One of the Plaintiff's experts in Memphis identified traces of a “wet high boiling liquid subject to air oxidation,” the chemical composition of which was not identified.

Transcript of Record — Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1944

There was no one working in the. mine, no pumpers, ‘no compressed air and no facilities for taking care of ‘water ‘ that had drained inté the low point during the idle period. ~ Q. … comments? Mr. Horn: | , ‘That is_ clear. Mr. Ball:: The next t paragraph i is “Method of ~— Production and.

Motion — Illinois v. City of Milwaukee

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1971

From ancient geological periods, Lake Michigan has been and is now a natural body of fresh water. It is bor- dered by the States of Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Indiana. … The copper produc- ing plant of the defendant company had polluted the Georgia air and land through the emission of noxious fumes.

Opposition Brief — May v. Shuttle, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1998

Income Security Act (“ERISA”)*, the Workers Adjustment * Employees in the “fleet service” craft or class perform aircraft cleaning, baggage handling, and ramp functions. … Security Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Malat v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1962

P Nor did the Court. comment directly on the result this denial’. … The carrier’s hands were not clean.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

air. … The result would be a balkanization of clean air regulations and a confused patchwork of standards, to the detriment of industry and the environment alike.” N. Car., ex rel. Cooper v. Tenn.