Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.57s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 16, 2024
Coopwood’s Air Conditioning Inc., 517 19 F.Supp.3d 656, 662-63 (S.D. Tex. 2021) Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. … See Gentili, 484 Mass, at 1012 (“[T]he prescriptive period . . . requires a private landowner to bring a [takings] action ... within a specified period of time.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Malat v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1962
P Nor did the Court. comment directly on the result this denial’. … The carrier’s hands were not clean.
371 U.S. 934Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Ct. at 1207-08 (distinguishing the act of interpreting a regulation from the act of amending it).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 8, 2020
This change in the agencies’ starting point for the comment period presumptively undermined the public’s meaningful opportunity to comment. … The agencies’ behavior during the postpromulgation comment period similarly shows that the agencies did not have an open mind during the comment period.
Petition for Rehearing — Schattman v. Texas Employment Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · 1973
United Air Lines, 444 F.2d 1194, 1198 (7th Cir. 1971), a Title VII case. … Women are allowed to scrub floors or clean clothes for free during but not for money. It is not the doing of the job that is prohibited, but the doing of it for hire.
409 U.S. 1107Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 6, 2019
Dep’t of Air Force, 411 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10, 17 Ariel Investments, LLC v. … The court noted that unlike other United States environmental laws, such as the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), CERCLA is not a regulatory statute.
Respondents Brief — Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2004
The Act provides the federal government with powerful mechanisms to ensure the clean-up of such properties. … This view is expressed in the National Contingency Plan, a set of EPA regulations adopted through the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act.
543 U.S. 157Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Olga Sandra Murra, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 10, 2018
Review of these accounts during this period revealed no checks written or other transfers to Ingrid, despite $287,000 of cleaning revenues in that twenty-seven-month period. … The Government also proffered bank records which showed that Murra used the house cleaning revenues for her own personal gain and that she made no transfers to Ingrid during that time period.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1975
Com- paring the unique language of Section 211 to the other operative sections of the Clean Air Act, the dissent con- cluded that the statute does not permit regulatory action based on speculation … Respondent had not accorded the required administrative due process because the final regulations were promulgated without giving Petitioners or other interested parties the opportunity for meaningful comment
Amicus Curiae Brief — Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
Two of their vessels were equipped with fired Scotch marine boilers, which had to be fired up and cleaned periodically while the vessels were docked so as to keep deck machinery operative. … * Id. at pp. 2-4, 16 following comment on the Uniform Licensing Actof 1930, which dealt with State licensing of aireratt airmen and the issuance of State air traffic es PT Tho act rosognised the
411 U.S. 624Respondents Brief — Smith v. Hall
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1937
After thoroughly cleaning and disinfecting the incubator, we obtained very few _organisms. … At this critical period, the Having bator temperature and naturall air which moves around them.
301 U.S. 216Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 28, 2024
United States, 272 U.S. 52, 116 (1926)) (cleaned up). … For instance, Congress in the Clean Air Act authorized the EPA to regulate certain sources of hazardous air pollutants, which are defined in 42 U.S.C. § 7412.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 8, 2025
The Clean Air Act at issue there directed “the EPA to set ‘ambient air quality standards . . . which in the judgment of the Administrator, based on [the] criteria [documents of § 108] and allowing an adequate … protect the public health with an adequate margin of safety,” and that, as so construed, the Clean Air Act “fits comfortably within the scope of discretion permitted by our precedent.”
Transcript of Record — Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1949
Mo te ae e ammo ; . ari R Z te . sae 4 : = ; In:spité of this cleans Indication that wo retroactive rate. … Act the language used in, the Railway *-Mail Pay Aet and the Air Mail Act.
336 U.S. 601Transcript of Record — DeForest Radio Co. v. General Elec. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1931
acts great gain and profits. … The action is merely a clean-up action? aye Yes, it is a clean-up action. 38 10 209. Will it clean up mercury 7 a A. My recollection is that ee will be cleaned up by some of tlie chemicals.
283 U.S. 664Amicus Curiae Brief — James L. Kisor, Petitioner v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2019
Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119 (1940) (cleaned up). … Id. at 159 (cleaned up).
Transcript of Record — Boire v. Greyhound Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1964
Eligible to vote are those in the unit who were employed durin © the payroll period immediately preceding the date below; including employees who did not work during that period because they were ill … SPECIFICS, Cleaning: EMERGENCY CLEANING, at all times, will be attended per occurrence within normal agreements of this contract.
376 U.S. 473Petitioners Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2007
(Clean Water Act or CWA). … The Clean Water Act, by its very terms, permits the EPA to consider only the nine specified factors.
549 U.S. 1105Transcript of Record — Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Renn
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1916
And it does not ap- pear that the defendant could have cleaned off the path and ap ees 73 kept it clean until after the plaintiff passed over it. … And it does not ap- pear that the defendant could have cleaned off the path and MRE ieee gory" piers th ih 73 kept it clean until after the plaintiff passed over it.
241 U.S. 290Joint Appendix — Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2007
Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. … After—the FTC received comments after it initiated this notice and comment period, correct? A. Yes. Q. Okay.
551 U.S. 142
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.