Documents

Transcript of Record — Anselmi v. Attorney General of the United States (No. 225)

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1953

based on Section 6(e) of the Air Mail Act of 1934, and on the Railway Mail Pay Act of 1916. … and the Railway Mail Pay Act of 1916 and the Air Mail Act of 1934.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lifestar Ambulance Service, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

ACTION: Final rule with comment period. … Comment: One commenter recommended a third air rate for air ambulance services furnished in remote, frontier areas such as Alaska.

Respondents Brief — Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1982

Air Act. … The legislative history of the Clean Air Act provi- sion also manifested Congressional concern for the “flagrant viola- tions of air and water pollution standards by Federal facilities.” S. Rep.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

Air Act. … Air Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell PLC, fka Royal Dutch Shell PLC, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024

Air Act. … Air Act.

Petition — Edgar v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

The grooming standards in effect for members of the Guard were set forth in the Air Force Manual 35-10 at section 1-12(2), as follows: Hair will be neat, clean, trimmed, and present a groomed appearance … His supervisor refused to comment on the reason for the suspensicn and stated that he would make no comment on the reason for the suspension other than that he felt confident that Edgar would be permanently

Respondents Brief — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 12, 2024

To achieve that objective, the Clean Water Act generally prohibits “the discharge of any pollutant by any person.” 33 U.S.C. 1311(a). … The term “effluent limitation” is broadly defined in the Act to refer to “any restriction” on the “quantities, rates and concentrations” A separate Clean Water Act program authorizes permits for the discharge

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tull v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987

Of these statutory sections, approximately 195 have been enacted since October 18, 1972, when the Clean Water Act became law. … This was held to constitute a “discharge of a pollutant” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act.

Amicus Brief — Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Kansas utilities have been driven to look to Wyoming coal, in large part, by Federal clean air and energy statutes. … Coal mined in the western states -- principally Wyoming and Montana -- meets air-quality re- quirements of Federal law far better than coal from any other region.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Policy Forum, Petitioner v. Alaska Public Offices Commission, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026

Specifically, the electioneering 4 communication definition “applies only (1) to a broadcast (2) clearly identifying a candidate for federal office, (3) aired within a specific time period, and (4) targeted … “Every ad covered” by Alaska’s disclosure and reporting laws for ballot initiatives “will by definition air just before [the] election.” Id.

Opposition Brief — Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. v. Festo Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997

(Newman, J., commenting). … Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950).

Reply Brief — Moore v. Mead Service Co.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1951

He admits that his actions were the cause of the price reduction, ‘and when I told him Candlord) about leaving, well, he got up in the air and told some others and none of them wanted me to leave, … Does it ay * das , a period of eight months and twenty-two-days, managed to re-establish its market in eight of the original eleven out. lets, at which time tt raised the price of bread.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 13, 2023

Air Act .............................................................11 Controlled Substances Act ..........................................8 Federal Communications Act ............................... … In West Virginia, for example, to analyze the Clean Air Act provisions relied on by the EPA, the Court turned to the “fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read

Amicus Curiae Brief — Philip Morris USA Inc., Petitioner v. Armand Fontaine, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Barbara Ellen Fontaine

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2026

Air Methods Corp., 870 F.3d 812, 817 (8th Cir. 2017) (en banc); EagleMed LLC v. Cox, 868 F.3d 893, 903 (10th Cir. 2017); Air Evac EMS, Inc. v. … Id. at 96 (Thomas, J., dissenting) (emphasis added; cleaned up).

Amicus Brief — Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980

Section 303 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1313, requires the States to establish water quality standards subject to EPA review and approval. … Clean Water Act, §304(a), 33 U.S.C. §1314(a).

Petition — Bayou Des Familles Development Corp. v. United States Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

of 1899, § 10, 33 U.S.C. § 403 (hereinafter RHA), and the Federal Water Pollution Act, § 404, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, renamed Clean Water Act (hereinafter CWA), the Corps of Engineers completely destroys … of 1899 (RHA), 33 U.S.C. 401, 403, and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1344.

Appellants Brief — Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Mississippi

Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1982

In those cases, the EPA Administrator ’ construed the Clean Air Act as authorizing him, in the event a state failed to submit an acceptable imple- mentation plan regulating the sources of air pollution … EPA, supra, 521 F.2d at 880.“ Noting that the Administrator’s interpreta- tion of his powers under the Clean Air Act would raise serious constitutional questions, the courts of appeals held that the

Transcript of Record — Koppers Co. v. Otto (No. 660)

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1957

Was that recommendation acted upon by the com pany?) oA. … To be ‘‘killed’’ means clean- ing.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. v. Lyon

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955

Did the decisions of this Court and the conforming decisions of the lower courts, on the test of patentable invention, during the period of twenty-five years preceding the Patent Act of July 19, 1952 … post facto support an award of damages for infringement which occurred dur- ing such period of invalidity prior to the Act, in view of See. 5 of the Act which, in repealing the applicable sections

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Bette Eakin, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 11, 2026

Transocean Air Lines, 365 U.S. 293, 295–96 (1961) (per curiam); Huddleston v. Dwyer, 322 U.S. 232, 236 (1944) (per curiam). … Mazars USA, LLP, 591 U.S. 848, 859 (2020) (cleaned up). IV.