Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.43s
Petition — New York State Department of Taxation & Finance v. Air Transport Ass'n of America
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
It asserts that section 184 violates the prohibitions of sec- tion 1113 of the Federal Aviation Act, stating that: (a) it imposes a tax On persons traveling in air commerce and on the air carriers’ … However, the statute was not enacted in 1973 on a clean slate.
464 U.S. 960Opposition Brief — Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972
Tropic- Aire, 57 F.2d 479 (cA. Se 1932). United States v. — 312 te ie Se BE GEEED coecocccece ~ Ry. Co. v. System deration, 300 U.S. 515 (1937).. … In the ensuing period of almost two years petitioners have never sought to bring the action back to life.
409 U.S. 844Respondents Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981
, 5 USC §§701-706 ...... 15, 16 Clean Air Act Amendment, 510 F2d 692, 700 .......... 16 1 Legislative History of the Water Pollution Control Act Amendment of 1972, p. 206 and page 331 .......... 13, … Circuit referred to the legislative history of the Clean Air Act Amendments which preceded and were the model for smilar provision in the FWPCA.
451 U.S. 304Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 19, 2023
Glenhaven Healthcare LLC, 27 F.4th 679, 684 (9th Cir. 2022) (cleaned up). … Saldana, 27 F.4th at 686 (cleaned up).
Petition for ReHearing — Brown v. Potter (No. 08-1091)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 2008
(waste elimination, processing and cleaning one’s own blood and eliminating body waste is a major life activ- ity under A. … Petitioner also, has difficulty sitting and standing for long periods of time.
Amicus Curiae Brief — T. M., Petitioner v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 21, 2026
River, 424 U.S. at 817 (cleaned up). … Davis, 587 U.S. 541, 548 (2019) (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2020
(cleaned up). … Ct. 1462, 1476 (2020) (discussing multifactor test for determining when a permit is required under the Clean Water Act, and explaining that sometimes “there are too many potentially relevant factors applicable
Record and brief — Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1988
A Juror: Your Honor, | would like to know what methods of cleaning the parts is there? Is it cleaning with ultrasonic waves or wire brushes, or how are the parts cleaned? … /d. at § 404, Comment a (1965).
487 U.S. 500Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
PT Wie BEN WHED . heceincsenencveves Dcievnidoasniccaidiniiliine Statutes and regulation: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (and Supp. II) 8 2 SN eee Section 301, 33 U.S.C. (and Supp. … Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (and Supp. II) 1342.
449 U.S. 825Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lifestar Ambulance Service, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
ACTION: Final rule with comment period. … Comment: One commenter recommended a third air rate for air ambulance services furnished in remote, frontier areas such as Alaska.
543 U.S. 1050Respondents Brief — Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1982
Air Act. … The legislative history of the Clean Air Act provi- sion also manifested Congressional concern for the “flagrant viola- tions of air and water pollution standards by Federal facilities.” S. Rep.
456 U.S. 305Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Mar 4, 2020
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes and other deductions) Employer Address Dates of Employment Cold Air Distributors 2262 N.W. 30th Place Pompano Beach, FL, 33069 12/2018 to 01/2019 Gross Monthly … Had the court acted in the prior case and opened up blacked out documents this case would have been over in the 2010 time period.
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Sep 11, 2021
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes and other deductions) Employer Address Dates of Employment Cold Air Distributors 2262 N.W. 30th Place Pompano Beach, FL, 33069 12/2018 to 01/2019 Gross Monthly … Had the court acted in the prior case and opened up blacked out documents this case would have been over in the 2010 time period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
Air Act. … Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
Air Act. … Air Act.
Petition — Edgar v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
The grooming standards in effect for members of the Guard were set forth in the Air Force Manual 35-10 at section 1-12(2), as follows: Hair will be neat, clean, trimmed, and present a groomed appearance … His supervisor refused to comment on the reason for the suspensicn and stated that he would make no comment on the reason for the suspension other than that he felt confident that Edgar would be permanently
444 U.S. 1077Opposition Brief — Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. v. Festo Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
(Newman, J., commenting). … Linde Air Products Co., 339 U.S. 605 (1950).
520 U.S. 1111Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 12, 2024
To achieve that objective, the Clean Water Act generally prohibits “the discharge of any pollutant by any person.” 33 U.S.C. 1311(a). … The term “effluent limitation” is broadly defined in the Act to refer to “any restriction” on the “quantities, rates and concentrations” A separate Clean Water Act program authorizes permits for the discharge
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tull v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Of these statutory sections, approximately 195 have been enacted since October 18, 1972, when the Clean Water Act became law. … This was held to constitute a “discharge of a pollutant” within the meaning of the Clean Water Act.
481 U.S. 412Appendix — Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995
public meetings are to be held during the public comment period. … The plaintiffs argue that this thirty day public comment period met the requirements of the NCP. In Astesian Water Co. v.
515 U.S. 1103
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.