Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

1.77s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Venegas v. Mitchell

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

    Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 556 (1986) 2.0.0... eeeeeeee 11 Pennsylvania v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 556, 559 (1986) (“Delaware Valley I), S. Rep.

    495 U.S. 82
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cedric Antonio Wright, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 7, 2021

    (cleaned up)). … Mays, 967 F.3d 748, 753 (8th Cir. 2020) (cleaned up).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

    The Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act all authorize citizens suits against polluters. … See 42 U.S.C. § 7604 (1982)(Clean Air Act); 42 U.S.C. § 6972 (1982)(RCRA); 33 U.S.C. § 1365 (1982) (Federal Water Pollution Control Act).

    491 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Aleutian Livestock Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1951

    The sheep so developed produced an unusually clean fleece of wool of an unusually high average weight per fleece. … The air action was indecisive and there was no surface action (R. 23).

    342 U.S. 875
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Dutton v. Cities Service Defense Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1957

    Act; and 3 Tithe: site thine the (‘ourt, in “Its opinion in the insti int cases, quade the comment that if these cases rere gqurerhed hu Section 4 gestead of Section 2 of the Aet it would have felt … Others are checking and sharpenmey thols; rest periods after arduous toll; biventory taking; periodical pliysica!

    355 U.S. 828
  • Opposition Brief — Gardiner v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

    for the period from the onset of injury or ‘IIness until the end of the voyage. … Sanchez was flown to the United States by tourist class air, receiving (pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement) a payment of $831 for the differential between tourist and first class airfare

    479 U.S. 924
  • Opposition Brief — Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Babbitt

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

    By Petitioner’s own admission, Pet. at 10, all but two of the cases involved citizen suits under the Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act, whose citizen suit provisions the court of appeals found distinguishable … Cir. 1990), Pet. at 11, in which the court in dicta referred to the citizen suit provisions of the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act but said nothing about SMCRA.

    507 U.S. 911
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2013

    The Silvicultural Rule was an appro- priate interpretation of the Clean Wa- ter Act. … The Ninth Circuit’s dramatic revision in the manner in which the Clean Water Act is implemented *.

    568 U.S. 1118
  • Brief for the United States — United States v. American Bldg. Maint. Industries

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1975

    Copp Paving Co., Inc., supra, Court commented that the “in commerce’’ Jan- e of Sections 3 and 7 of thé Clayton Act and ion 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Act “appears to te only persons or activities … Michigan Window Cleaning Co., 327 U.S. 173).

    422 U.S. 271
  • Appendix — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1973

    Fortunately, we do not write on a clean slate in this area. Six courts have confronted discriminations among types of speech like the one challenged here. … That history shows that Con- gress specifically debated and rejected the idea of the licensee being required to act as a common carrier with respect to transmission of comment on public issues.

    412 U.S. 94
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donald Clinton Crabtree, Petitioner v. Christine Crabtree

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 2, 2021

    The South Carolina laws implied jurisdiction due to a one year residency establishment period. The Husband’s filings were given under duress with a 1.5 day response period. … into equity must come with clean hands.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — The Ohio Adjutant General's Department, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 16, 2022

    (cleaned up); Duro v. Reina, 495 U.S. 676, 693 (1990) (“As full citizens, Indians share in the territorial and political sovereignty of the United States.”). … XVIII (“Union members may voluntarily revoke dues withholding after a one-year period.”).

  • Petition — Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Department of Environmental Resources

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

    The granting of such a variance will not prevent or interfere with attainment or maintenance of ambient air standards within the time prescribed by the Federal Clean Air Act and Rules and Regulations … On April 15, 1975, DER initiated enforcement proceedings in this Court pursuant to the Air Pollution Control Act, Act of January 8, 1960, P. L. (1959) 2119, as amended, 35 P.

    434 U.S. 969
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 24, 2023

    L. 307 (2000) ................ 18 Jason Bailey, Clean Water Act, Section 404 Applicants: May the Odds Be Ever in Your Favor, 3 AM. U. BUS. L. … Gorsuch, 742 F.2d 1028, 1036 (7th Cir. 1984) (addressing the Clean Air Act).

  • Appendix — White v. Commissioner

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1956

    Those books, Exhibits A and B, are the only two volumes you did in that period? A. In that rough period; yes, sir. … The court in Doggett had before it § 214(a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1926.

    351 U.S. 939
  • Reply Brief — Century Air Freight, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1984

    past, executed acts of discrimination in air transportation. … , whether expressed in old §404 of the Act or §1002(k), of untrammeled access to air transportation.

    469 U.S. 1073
  • Respondents Brief — Minnesota Sands, LLC, Petitioner v. County of Winona, Minnesota

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 4, 2020

    (c) "Processing" means washing, cleaning, screening, crushing, filtering, sorting, processing, stockpiling, and storing silica sand, either at the mining site or at any other site. … Air quality and adverse effects from particulates from silica sand mining and processing were addressed by many persons both in written and oral comment. Of note, Dr.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Posner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

    In Liquid Air Corp. v. Rogers, 834 F.2d 1297 (CA 7, 1987) the court affirmed a civil RICO jury verdict. … Horak, 833 F.2d 1235, 1240 (7th Cir. 1987); Liquid Air Corp. v. Rogers, 834 F.2d 1297, 1304 (7th Cir. 1987).

    489 U.S. 1067
  • Reply Brief — City of Irvine v. County of Orange

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1987

    The public review and comment period for DEIR 508 began on July 13, 1984, and was scheduled to end on August 27, 1984. … On August 14, 1984, the City of Newport Beach requested in writing that the public review and comment period for DEIR 508 be extended from August 27, 1984 until September 11, 1984.

    480 U.S. 946
  • Petition for Rehearing — Alvin Sheldon Kanofsky, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · May 18, 2018

    As well, he worked as a contractor for for the Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, as an investigator on radiation effects on optical fibers and other components. … and material that has occurred in the interim Period since the original submission and the present time and is of essential relevance to the case.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.