Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 429 (1987) (“the reason the Ex Post Facto Clauses were included in the Constitution was to assure that federal and state legislatures were restrained from enacting arbitrary … Hutto, 437 U.S. at 690.
531 U.S. 250Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 16, 2022
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987). … Turner, 482 U.S. at 89.
Amicus Curiae Brief — BASF Corp. v. Peterson (No. 06-144)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Coors Brewing Co., 514 U.S. 476, 481-482 (1995), and truthful statements about the retail prices of liquor, see 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island, 517 U.S. 484 (1996). … Discovery Network, 507 U.S. at 423. Indeed, Justice Thomas doubts “whether it is even possible to draw a coherent distinction between commercial and noncommercial speech.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Ct., 482 U.S. 522, 555 (1987) (Blackmun, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). … Banco Nacional de Cuba, 406 U.S. 759, 767-768 (1972) (opinion of Rehnquist, J.) (em- phasis added); see Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423 (1964).
546 U.S. 1001Petition — Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. McKenna
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Wyler, 267 N.E.2d at 423. … Code, §6-5-482; (3) on the date when the 00K F §) () pace B45 a 40 act or omission actually occurred.
449 U.S. 976Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Glen Taylor Helzer, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 18, 2024
Rettig, 589 F.2d 418, 423 (1978). … Rettig, 589 F.2d 418, 423 cf. Horton v.
Reply Brief — Nicosia v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1981
Demma, 423 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1975) .. 2-3 United States v. Johnston, 426 F.2d 112 (7th Cir.1970) 2 Constitution U.S. Const., Article III, Section 2, Clause 3 .........0... 2,3 U.S. … Demma, 423 1The Solicitor General’s reliance upon the “two-court” rule of Berenyi v. Immigration Director, 385 U.S. 630, 635 (1967), is mis- placed.
452 U.S. 961Petition — Watson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
Davis, 482 F.2d 983 (1973) .... 32 em, TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED Cases Page United States v. Harper, 617 F.2d 35 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 887, EGE B. … U.S. 217, 80 S.
459 U.S. 1038Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Boerne v. Flores
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 636 (1987) (Scalia, J., dissenting). … See Edwards, 482 U.S. at 638 (Scalia, J., dissenting).
521 U.S. 507Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1981
Atchley, 400 U.S. 423 (1971) ........csccssesereesereeeeees 1,2 Constitutions, Statutes, and Rules U.S. Const. amend. V. .........cssssssssssssscssscssseescseeseessssssssessesoscoessensens 4 U.S. … Atchley, 400 U.S. 423 (1971). That brief went on to quote from Procunier v.
450 U.S. 1014Slip Opinion — Lingle v. Chevron USA Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2005
County of Los Angeles, 482 U. S. 304, 314 (1987). … United States, 495 U.S. 423, 432 (1990); id., at 447 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment).
544 U.S. 528Opposition Brief — City & County of San Francisco v. Stone
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 (1987)...... 1 Gross v. Tazewell County Jail, 533 F. Supp. 413 (W.D. 8 EE ee eee a eer ee eer ere 21 GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 665 (1987). At bot- tom, that is what the petition demands. The petition should be denied.
506 U.S. 1081Respondents Brief — Busic v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1980
United States, 423 U.S. 212, 217-218 (1976). … United States, supra, 423 U.S. at 218, quoting American Fur Co. v.
446 U.S. 398Reply Brief — Shannon L. Ferguson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 3, 2018
United States, 495 U.S. 575, 599 (1990) (emphasis added). … Erin Rust Assistant Federal Community Defender 835 Georgia Avenue, Suite 600 Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 (423) 756-4349 13
Respondents Brief — Class v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1065 (2017) (No. 16-424)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017
Menna, 423 U.S. at 62; see Blackledge, 417 U.S. 21. … Cir. 2015); see Menna, 423 U.S. at 62; Blackledge, 417 U.S. at 30.
Petitioners Reply Brief — Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co. v. Ryan
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984
Westover, 359 U.S. 500 ae hae oe ee thc kh booed ee ake Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 (1962).. Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. Challoner, 423 U.S. 3 SS Ee Pe re ee eee ee ee Eisen v. … Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980); Thermtron Products, Inc. vy. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976); Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964); Dairy Queen, Inc. v.
465 U.S. 1067Reply Brief — John L. Stanton, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2024
Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 137 (1975). … See Moore, 423 U.S. at 137; see also Gonzales v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Train Dispatchers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Locomotive Engineers, 482 U.S. 270 (1987). … Locomotive Engineers, supra, 482 U.S. at 298 (concurring opinion).
499 U.S. 117Opposition — Watkins v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
Rocha, 527 F. 2d 423, 429 (C.A. 5), certiorari denied, No. 75-6432, June 7, 1976; United States v. Chapin, 515 F. 2d 1274, 1284 (C.A.D.C.), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 1015. … United States, 336 U.S. 613, 618.
429 U.S. 1034Amicus Curiae Brief — Ten Eyck v. Leather
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 929 (1975) ............ 7 Burt v. Smith, 181 N.Y. 1 (1905), appe i dismissed, Be Cs TEP CA eva ddeinee cee Pe Py oe 7 Cameron v. … State of New York, 37 N.Y.2d 451, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 929 (1975)). 8 The result reached in Heck does not, it is respectfully submitted, leave claimants like Leather without a federal forum for
533 U.S. 941
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.