Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.42s
Transcript of Record — Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. City of Raleigh
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1916
Wherefore, the complainant, Seaboard Air Line Railway pray that the Court grant unto it a writ of injunction, commanding th said City of Raleigh, and all persons claiming to act under its au thority … of 1856 and 1857, Section 58, of which is as follows: and which was in force Aug. 5, 1881: “That the Commissioners shall cause to be kept clean and in repair streets, sidewalks and elleys.
242 U.S. 15Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Owens v. French
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
There is no summertime forced-air system to the cells. The cold and hot air systems are inadequate. … Cells are wet mopped only once a week, often without the benefit of cleaning materials.
479 U.S. 817Opposition — City of Los Angeles v. Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
I, Sec. 1 ............. 9 Clean Air Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C., Sec. … The Clean Air Amendments of 1970 also expressly permit suits by private citizens (42 U.S.C. §7604|e}): **Nothing in iis section shall restrict any right which any person (or class of persons) may have
449 U.S. 820Amicus Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981
Decisions under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7411, which has to do with the establishment of performance standards for entirely new sources, place similar restraints on administrative … While the cited cases arose under the Clean Air Act, they involve the setting of standards limiting airborne concentrations of a pollutant just as the Cotton Dust and Lead cases do, and hence the statements
452 U.S. 490Appendixmm — Bieneman v. Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Appendixmm · 1989
§2401(a) for suits against the United States, a period that is employed to mark the outer limits for purposes of in- verse condemnation actions under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. §1491(aX1). … Garcia and Good- man concluded that only one period should be borrowed from state law, the one generally applicable to personal injuries.¢ 3 The 12-year period in the Quiet Title Act, 28 U.S.C. §2409a
490 U.S. 1080Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 10, 2025
Id. at 858 (cleaned up). … Pet.App.7a (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 2, 2023
Id. at 2609 (cleaned up). … Id. at 2608 (cleaned up).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 17, 2025
Assn. of Realtors, 594 U.S. at 724 (cleaned up) (quoting Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324; Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 160). … United States, 276 U.S. 394, 409 (1928)); accord Whitman, 531 U.S. at 473 (“Congress must ‘lay down by legislative act an intelligible principle to which the person or body authorized to [act] is directed
Reply Brief — National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Ashcroft
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
The Act’s Interim Provision granted a 20-day grace period for destruction of the background-check records by local law enforcement. 18 U.S.C. § 922(s)(6)(B)(i). … There, this Court “refused to find implicit in ambiguous sections of the CAA [Clean Air Act] an authorization to consider costs that has elsewhere, and so often, been expressly granted.” 1215S.
533 U.S. 928Appellants Brief — Midlantic Nat. Bank v. New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1986
West Virginia Water Pollu- tion Control Act, W. Va. Code § 20-5A-1 et seq., 1981, 1984 Supp. (Water Pollution); West Virginia Air Pollution Control Act, W. Va. … Its judgments should be con- firmed. 6 See, e.g., the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; the Water Pollution Control Act,
474 U.S. 494Petitioners Brief — Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/S v. Blumental Import Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1940
Hubert, supra, Stanley & Co. of Calcutta, acting as agents of Cooper, Smith & Co. of Philadelphia, lien. … Y.), 70 Fed. 32, cited by the Cireuit Court of Appeals, R. p. 312, the -harterers, acting in the immediate presence of the masterand ag his amanuenses, signed, as his agents, clean bills of lading
311 U.S. 707Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
United is an air carrier within the meaning of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U. S. C. § 1301(3). 4. … United is an air carrier within the meaning of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. §1301(3). 3.
454 U.S. 944Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Auburn v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
As Auburn suggests, railroads would therefore not be subject to the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251), the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. § 1531), the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C … . § 4321) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401).
527 U.S. 1022Amicus Curiae Brief — Sunoco LP, et al., Petitioners v. City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
Besides interstate water compacts, Congress also enacted the Clean Water Act. … City of New York, 993 F.3d at 95 (“[T]he Clean Air Act does not regulate foreign emissions. So the City’s claims concerning those emissions still require us to apply federal common law.”).
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Jared Polis, et al. · Dec 9, 2020
These measures all act in concert to reduce the exposure of individuals to disease, and are necessary steps to protect the health and welfare of the public. … Conduct cleaning protocols as follows: a. Daily deep cleaning and disinfecting and full cleaning in-between shifts in accordance with CDPHE guidance; and b.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benito Moreno-Rodriguez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 23, 2020
Sosa, 387 F.3d 131 (2d Cir. 2004) ............................................................ 15 viii Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) of 1996, § 309(c)(2), Pub. L.
Opposition Brief — Burlington Northern Railroad v. Anderson
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Instruction No. 7, the verdict director, was based on multiple acts of negligence and was a modification of MAI 17.02. … Plaintiff began working for defendant on August 9, 1976, washing and cleaning cabooses and business cars.
476 U.S. 1116Record and brief — Lewis v. California
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
He was northbound on Broadway Avenue in his patrol car, approaching 87th Street, when he detected a strong chemical odor in the air. (R.T. 10- 11.) … Also, during the crucial time period, she actually visited the premises.
455 U.S. 1021Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 10, 2024
Cir. 2015) (cleaned up). … That effort does not belong here: Neither the Court nor a jury acts as a “super-personnel department.” Barbour, 181 F.3d at 1346 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
FPC, 387 U.S. 428 (1967) .....ccccssceseesreereersees 7, 14 Statutory Provisions Clean Water Act section 101, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 ................ 17 Clean Water Act section 303, 33 U.S.C. § 1313...... … ...... 3,17 Clean Water Act section 401, 33 U.S.C. § 1341 ................ 3 Clean Water Act section 518, 33 U.S.C. § 1377(€) ss... 17 iv 38 Me.
547 U.S. 370
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.