Documents

Respondents Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1985

Al22). 37 informal public comment period, a hearing, and coordination between EPA's rulemaking experts and diffuse state and regional office personnel. … August 20, 1984 A-l CLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONS 1.

Respondents Brief — Venegas v. Mitchell

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1990

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) 9, 11, 16, 17, 27, 31 People v. Reyes, 12 Cal. 3d 486, 526 P.2d 225, 116 ee Se I a saemninnebonmapsenaiainn 3 Pharr v. … Housing Authority, 704 F.2d 1216 (11th Cir. 1983).*° In their treatise on professional re- 21 While Delaware Valley concerned attorney’s fees under the Clean Air Act, the Court applied the principles

Amicus Curiae Brief — International Paper Co. v. Ouellette

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

In the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (& Supp. … Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, more- over, does not aid IPC’s cause. Section 505 concerns citizens suits brought under the Clean Water Act to en- force that Act’s requirements.

Response to application from respondents Jared Polis, et al. — High Plains Harvest Church, et al., Applicants v. Jared Polis, Governor of Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Response to application from respondents Jared Polis, et al. · Dec 9, 2020

symptoms of disease or a positive test date if asymptomatic, within a 14-day period. … Conduct cleaning protocols as follows: a. Daily deep cleaning and disinfecting and full cleaning in-between shifts in accordance with CDPHE guidance; and b.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Friends of Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Treasury as penalties, in strict accordance with the Clean Water Act. Even though the Act only authorizes penalties to the U.S. … CLEAN WATER ACT AT THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMEN PLANT AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1996-97 co-owner and operator of the Waters Qua--ty at 195 Belle Air Road, which is sus tect to tion System

Opposition Brief — Elias v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

EPA, 796 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir. 1986) ......... 13 Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413 13 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. 33 U.S.C. 1319(a) 13 33 U.S.C. 1323(a) 16 33 U.S.C … See, e.g., 33 U.S.C. 1819(a), 1342(b), 13424) (Clean Water Act); 42 U.S.C. 300g-3 (Safe Drinking Water Act); 42 U.S.C. 7413 (Clean Air Act).

Opposition Brief — Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Skidmore

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1948

XXXVITT) ............ 32 Federal Employers’ Liability Act (Title 45 U.S. C. … It had all been burned down clean; all the doors, spreaders, everything, dropped underneath the car. Q.

Petitioners Brief — Printz v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1996

United I a a a 27 David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act , 2 Col. J. Environ. … Indeed, David Salmon, The Federalist Principle: Interaction of the Commerce Clause and the Tenth Amendment in the Clean Air Act, 2 Col. J. Environ. L. 290, 326-27 (1976).

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Lesser v. Sertner's, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948

During the aforementioned period, the ultimate ccn- sumer, whose goods were cleaned and processed by this defendant, rarely came into this defendant’s premises. 5 8, During the period at issue, this … A. 1, 1944))}, In commenting on the very exemption here involved, this court, in A. H. Phillips Co. v. Walling, 329 U.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Electric Power Supply Association, et al., Petitioners v. John B. Rhodes, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 7, 2019

Plaintiffs challenged the ZEC programs, including on the basis that they were preempted by the Federal Power Act. … His career has focused on better understanding air pollution and global warming problems and developing large-scale clean, renewable energy solutions to them.

Reply Brief — Fleet Factors Corp. v. United States, 111 S. Ct. 752 (1991) (No. 90-504)

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1991

Congress is therefore unlikely to visit CERCLA issues in the near future because it has several other major en- vironmental statutes to reauthorize in the meantime (i.e., the Clean Water Act and the … Resource Conservation and Recovery Act).

Reply Brief — South Carolina Medical Ass'n v. Thompson

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2003

American Trucking Ass’n, 531 U.S. 457 + | Peeerererer re Teer etter er eee ete 2, 3, 4-5 Statutes and Regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7407-7409 ............... 3 Health Insurance Portability … Indeed, were the rule otherwise, the Clean Air Act provisions recently at issue in American Trucking Ass’n, would have passed constitutional muster on the ground that Congress had instructed the Environmental

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Sheaffer v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1963

. : = 2 <- 2" air 2 - « . S es . … can ever be cleaned for the lies*and deceit used to deprove the peti-_ tioner of his position of employment with the respondent.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Coates v. Strahan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

(Coalition for Clean Air, Inc. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist., et al., U.S.D.C., C.D. Cal. No. CV 97-6916.) … These include the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Coastal Zone Management Act.

Application — The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York, Applicant v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of New York

Supreme Court brief · Application · Nov 12, 2020

(cleaned up). … The faithful should be reminded that a perfect Act of Contrition and doing acts of penance with trust in the mercy of God will suffice during this challenging time.

Amicus Brief — Milwaukee v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

It has an interest in this case because the decision below interprets the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, PL 92-500, the Clean Water Act of 1977, PL 95-217 which amends the 1972 Act, and … og - RESET ARSR ARC ie conape ew NG 2 FRE 9 Statutes: Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Rie I ahi iaihirdcalonck sitet scaled iabetabtacaeunis 2, 8, 10 Clean Water Act of 1977, P.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Charles v. City of Chicago

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1953

The present ordinance requires that all such business estab- lishments be kept in a clean and wholesome condition and adequately ventilated so as to insure free circulation of fresh air at all times … of time; and also that the operations require that the poultry and fowl be opened, cleaned and plucked, whereby the refuse, blood and feathers remain for con- siderable periods of time, all of which

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hearst Newspapers, L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Antonio Martinelli

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 2, 2023

(cleaned up). … separate infringing acts trigger separate limitations periods.

Appendix — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1988

Some of these commenters believe that cable op- erators have an incentive to keep new stations off the air. … ATC, 89 Cable Operators filing joint comments (89 Cable Commenters) and others state that the provisions of Section 624(f1) and (2) of the Cable Act bar the Com- mission from adopting new rules.’

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Colorado Springs v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Attendance — five people. 07-26-82 Close of written comment period on DEIS. … In addition to the comments that were received during the public comment period and published in Section 6.2 of the final EIS, we have considered other comments that were received up to the time of