Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.34s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Berman Enterprises, Inc. v. Jorling
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
.; Standard Tank Cleaning Corp.; Standard Tank Cleaning Co.; Berman Enterprises, Inc; Marine Movements, Inc.; Barge Operations, Inc.; Mercury Tank Cleaning Corp.; Water Facil- ities, Inc.; Waterways … If there were any doubt as to congressional design, provi- sions in the Federal Water Pollution Control Aci (the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, as amended by ihe Oil Pollution Control Act
510 U.S. 1073Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024
During this comment period, any interested member of the public can comment and may ask for a public hearing. Id. § 124.11. … After the comment period closes, the agency must consider and respond to all significant comments that were received, 40 C.F.R. § 124.17, and must also include or respond to comments provided by other
Transcript of Record — United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1959
This main line here, which I do not have in my notes, FE can’t comment upon. … Will you state over what period of time these move. ments into Hope well yard have been handled with air brakes in use and over what perion of time without the use of air brakes? A.
361 U.S. 78Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2025
. § 552(a)(6)(E)(iii) ........................................... 6 Other Authorities Advanced Clean Cars Program, CAL. AIR RES. BD. … Air Act to remedy environmental concerns unique to California, such as high smog levels in the Los Angeles Basin.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024
Air Res. … Air Res.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 23, 2025
Air Regul. Grp., 573 U.S. at 324). … West Virginia, for example, did not consider EPA actions issued under other Clean Air Act provisions in its “unheralded” analysis. 597 U.S. at 726 n.1 (rejecting the relevance of similar EPA actions that
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 11, 2025
Air Act. … This aspect of the court’s decision directly contradicted the Second Circuit’s decision about the effect of the Clean Air Act on preemption of common law claims. New York, 993 F.3d at 98–99.
Opposition Brief — Federal Insurance Co. v. Susquehanna Broadcasting Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
, 42 U.S.C. $§ 9601 et seq., conflicts with and is preempted by that Act. … The text of CERCLA itself expressly permits responsi- ble parties to obtain insurance to cover the costs to clean up environmental contamination.
502 U.S. 823Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 25, 2024
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) ............................................. 5, 9, 24, 29 Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. … And “in determining an award of reasonable attorney’s fees under § 7002(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) or § 505(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act (CWA)),” the Court
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Warren v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Corridor A-S (ceiling) was cleaned and ready to receive paint. … Approval was given to paint this area. 1 suggested that a couple of the men start painting this cleaned area and the rest of the crew continue to clean the remaining areas. [Emphasis added.]
419 U.S. 1089Amicus Curiae Brief — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
The Corps during this period did not assert Section 404 jurisdiction over the project, and indeed in commenting on NEPA documentation required for the project in 1984, the Corps specifically disavowed … any reasonable construction of the Clean Water Act.
531 U.S. 159Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018
EPA, No. 15-3751, pet. dism’d for lack of jurisdiction (6th Cir., Feb. 28, 2018) (defining “Waters of the United States” under Clean Water Act); Utility Air Reg. Group v. EPA, 134 S. … Ct. 2427 (2014) (challenge to EPA’s Clean Air Act “tailoring rule”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — ConAgra Grocery Products Company, et al., Petitioners v. California
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 16, 2018
Watson, Comment, Venturing into the “Impenetrable Jungle”: How California’s Expansive Public Nuisance Doctrine May Result in an Unprecedented Judgment Against the Lead Paint Industry in the Case of County … This Court reversed, holding that “the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Apr 10, 2023
Air Act viability of state-law claims.” … Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481 (1987), make clear that once Congress stepped into the void temporarily filled by judge-made law, preemption became governed by the Clean Air Act, not the federal common law it
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Oliver v. Hydro-Vac Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
the Tennessee Hazardous Waste Management Act and the Tennessee Solid Waste Management Act. … I made no comment to either Foxworth or Cochran concerning the foregoing information. ie.
525 U.S. 827Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Stief v. J. A. Sexauer Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief in Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1967
above the clean-out opening (9lla). … As pointed out earlier, petitioner saw~ice forming 6 or 8 inches above the clean- out opening, meaning that the stoppage material, if acting as claimed, was above the galvanized elbow which ended four
389 U.S. 897Appendix — Sun Country Airlines, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995
Four of the commenters, including ATA, Delta Air Lines, and RAA, commented on whether reserve status should be considered part of a duty period. … Aviation Act.
516 U.S. 1008Opposition Brief — Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
EPA’s Clean Water Act Implementing Regulations ........ 15 3. NYSDEC’s Interpretation of the Clean Water Act is Similar to that Adopted by EPA ................ 20 4. … ASLF’s Interpretation of the Clean Water Act Would Cripple the NPDES PURINE WOME 0 ov vs ccccccisecees 23 POINT II A CITIZEN SUIT UNDER SECTION 1365 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT MAY NOT BE PREMISED SOLELY
513 U.S. 811Transcript of Record — Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1931
It may be with air or it may -- be carbonic acid gas or with other gas that cannot act chem- i | : ically on the matter treated.’’ … clean out his coke? The Witness: To clean up this stock.. 3 The Master: To clean up his, stock by eliminating his coke?
283 U.S. 163Memo for Respondent — United States v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Memo for Respondent · 1954
The respondent had served in the Army Air Force from October 27, 1942, to August 6, 1944. … Six Years later, on March 8, 1990, he was operated upon by the Veterans Administration for the purpose of ‘cleaning up’ the knee joint.
348 U.S. 110
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.