Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filtersbriefs

10,000+ results

0.55s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 138 S. Ct. 42 (2017) (No. 16-285)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also issued a directive adhering to a judicially-invalidated interpretation of the Clean Air Act. Natl Envitl. Dev. Ass'n’s Clean Air Project v. … Ass’n’s Clean Air Project, 752 F.3d at 1003. The D.C. Circuit found “no merit in EPA’s arguments” and struck down the directive to ignore Summit.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Upsher v. Grosse Pointe Public School System

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002

    SECTION 418.131(1) .......ccccccccscssssscssssssessssesseseceessces 2 FEDERAL REGULATIONS iv : CLEAN AIR ACT. 36 FED. … pollutant” in the regulations to the Clean Air Act. 36 Fed.

    537 U.S. 880
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Michael Sackett, et ux., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 17, 2022

    Reg. 41,206, 41,251-54 (Nov. 13, 1986); Clean Water Act Section 404 Program Definitions and Permit 15 Court recognized that the Clean Water Act extends federal regulatory jurisdiction over waters and … Some streams may appear perennial (flowing for years at a time) but may lose surface flow during periods of drought.

  • Opposition Brief — Jamaica Time Petroleum, Inc. v. Federal Insurance

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1967

    Appeals and more largely ee by the Judiciary Act of 1925. . Tia at ae ai? . ~ and — 349 U:S. at 74: . But this Court does not sit to mE P an interest in such issues. … During this period the aircraft ‘ was not used on company business and no removal of radio equipment was attempted (R. 96).. The airplane - ‘merely.

    385 U.S. 1024
  • Petition for Rehearing — Jane Cummings, Petitioner v. Premier Rehab Keller, P.L.L.C.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Rehearing · May 23, 2022

    (cleaned up). Nor should “the limits of the drafters’ imagination supply [any] reason to ignore the law’s demands.” Bostock, 140 S. Ct. at 1737. … (cleaned up). Accordingly, the Court should grant rehearing to clarify this aspect of its broad categorical holding. III.

  • Reply Brief — Lee v. International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992

    Although increased litter is an in- evitable result of handbilling, the practice may not be banned to keep the streets clean. Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147, 162 (1939). … While the Port Authority points to unverified complaints during the period from 1975 through 1986, their nature and pattern is, if anything, a strong argument for the effectiveness of rules short of

    505 U.S. 830
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — American Petroleum Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Defense Center, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 25, 2023

    There was a thirty-day public comment period, during which the agencies received thousands of comments from individuals, scientists, federal and state agencies, and elected officials. … After a thirty-day public comment period, they issued a Final EA in May 2016. See id. 106599 et seq.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Dix v. United Airlines, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001

    Constantinendes also groomed Dix in preparation of his interview including ironing his clothing to a crisp and clean appearance. … United Air Lines, Inc., No. 73 C 972 (N.D. Ill).

    534 U.S. 892
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Budha Jam, et al., Petitioners v. International Finance Corporation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 14, 2022

    E.g., Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986, 993 (2019). … , 1947 (UN Act 1947”) to the IFC.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Browner

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    INTRODUCTION Industry and its supporters ask the Court to avoid deciding their non-delegation claim by construing section 109 of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. § 7409, to require EPA to consider … H2252 (1995) (bill would supersede Clean Air Act’s “adequate margin of safety” requirement); S. Rep. 104-90, at 135 (1995) (addi- tional views).

    530 U.S. 1202
  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    as a ‘person subject to the Railway Labor Act,” and a union representing the air carrier’s employees, excluded from the status of employees under the National Labor Relations Act as ‘‘indi- vidual … within that period, Lufthansa **may then select a caterer of its choice’? (R. 198).

    419 U.S. 881
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shannon Poe, Petitioner v. Idaho Conservation League

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 15, 2024

    The Clean Water Act 1. Congress enacted the Clean Water Act to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a). … This case is a good vehicle to resolve the conflicts over the Clean Water Act’s meaning and scope.

  • Respondents Brief — Johnny Kirkland, Petitioner v. Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jul 30, 2019

    Kirkland Case 1:17-cv-00135-HSO-JCG Document 75 Filed 09/11/18 Page 3 of 15 worked as a third class laborer, which included cleaning up, painting, cleaning insulation, grinding rust off tanks, cleaning … Liquid Air Corp., 387 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. Case 1:17-cv-00135-HSO-JCG Document 75 Filed 09/11/18 Page 9 of 15 1994) (en banc); see also Lujan v.

  • Transcript of Record — Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1931

    [se é a om EO bee ~ clean. … Alone, the boilers A* and A* =” are ‘periodic with\long periods, ‘without any inconvenience.

    283 U.S. 163
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

    See EPA, Interpretive Statement on Application of the Clean Water Act NPDES Program to Releases of Pollutants From a Point Source to Groundwater [“Interpretive Statement”], 84 Fed. … In UARG, the Court rejected EPA’s expansive interpretation of its Clean Air Act powers to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions, explaining: EPA’s interpretation is also unreasonable because it would bring

  • Transcript of Record — Gray v. Powell

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1941

    It must be of a clean and good steaming character. … EVASION OF THE ACT Intervenor comments upon the alleged efforts of applicant.

    314 U.S. 402
  • Petitioners Reply Brief — Public Service Co. of Indiana v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983

    Although EPA pays lip service to the principle that the States have “primary authority to choose their own ‘mix of [emission] limitations’ under the Clean Air Act (Opp. … This petition presents an opportunity to decide whether the Government’s previous arguments to this Court regarding the revision section of, and State autonomy under, the Clean Air Act are promises

    459 U.S. 1127
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — City and County of San Francisco, California, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2024

    During this comment period, any interested member of the public can comment and may ask for a public hearing. Id. § 124.11. … After the comment period closes, the agency must consider and respond to all significant comments that were received, 40 C.F.R. § 124.17, and must also include or respond to comments provided by other

  • Transcript of Record — United States v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad

    Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1959

    This main line here, which I do not have in my notes, FE can’t comment upon. … Will you state over what period of time these move. ments into Hope well yard have been handled with air brakes in use and over what perion of time without the use of air brakes? A.

    361 U.S. 78
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2025

    L.J. 175 (1997) ................... 10 Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs, Air Force Awards Contract for Next Generation Air Dominance (NDAG) Platform, F-47 (Mar. 21, 2025), https://www.af.mil/News … Puerto Rico Aqueduct, 506 U.S. at 147 (cleaned up).

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.