Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.56s
Opposition Briefo — Snyder v. United States (No. 08-894)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Briefo · 2008
Dep't of the Navy, NAVMED P-5010- ' The district court noted that TCE and PCE were not regulated as pollutants under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. … , the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq., or the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300f et seq., until well after the ime period relevant to this law suit.
Supreme Court brief · Application · May 4, 2020
Test name and code: COVID-19 (Test code: 8000101424) Note: Order as “Miscellaneous” and add comment: “COVID-19 ARUP” Collect: Nasopharyngeal swab. … (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Central Gulf Steamship Corp. v. Grace Line, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) 46 U.S.C. 1303 (6). STATEMENT OF CASE. … United Air Lines v. Wiener, 355 F.2d 379, 403 (9th Cir. 1964); American Tobacco Co. v. Transport Corp., 277 FSupp. 457 (E.D. Va. 1967).
398 U.S. 939Opposition Brief — American Mining Mining Congress Congress v. Thomas (Nos. 85-1280, 85-1279)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
These piles long sinee had been abandoned and were to be cleaned up with federal and state funds. … In Train, the court of appeals concluded that EPA was required by the Clean Water Act to regu- late discharges of radioactive pollutants, including “source, 15.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 13, 2026
(cleaned up). … Id. at 676 (cleaned up).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joseph D Gilberti, Jr., Petitioner v. The Pentagon, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 3, 2023
Why are all Respondents hiding this US Resource when Viruses travel in Water Supply as much as the air during a National Coronavirus Pandemic? … Who are these crazy US Judges and 10 courtrooms who hide clean water, jobs and more for Politicians and Terrorist? This is US TREASON by Judges!
Opposition Brief — American Mining Congress v. Thomas
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
The initial comment period, which continued for 11 weeks, was reopened on two occasions. See 48 Fed. Reg. 50906 (1983); 48 Fed. Reg. 52604 (1983). … Such a notice requirement would lead to a never-ending cycle of public notice and comment and thereby frustrate impor- tant statutory purposes, which, in the case of the Clean Water Act, Congress determined
479 U.S. 814Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 18, 2025
Pet.App.8a (cleaned up). … Id. at 906 n.11 (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
Clinton, 566 U.S. 189 (2012).............................................. 31 STATUTES AND RULES Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. ........ passim 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a) .......................... … In that case, after the Fourth Circuit held that the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “Act”) covers indirect additions of pollutants from point sources to navigable waters, Kinder Morgan sought certiorari.
Opposition Brief — Tseng Fu Lin v. City of Goldsboro
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996
After repeated notifica- tions over a period of nine months, and Petitioner’s con- tinuing refusal to install the grease interceptor, Respondents acted to protect the health and welfare of the citizens … the administration and enforcement of all sections of the North Carolina State Building code pertaining to plumbing, electrical systems, general building restrictions and regulations, heating and air
519 U.S. 822Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 18, 2018
Cir. 2000), the District of Columbia Circuit determined it had jurisdiction to review a Clean Air Act guidance document published on an Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) website. … In 2011, yet another Clean Air Act guidance was found reviewable where it bound EPA regional directors. See Nat. Res. Def. Council v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 643 F.3d 311, 320 (D.C. Cir. 2011).
Emergency Application — Gouyen Brown Lopez, et al., Applicants v. United States, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Mar 14, 2026
Unlike a plethora of other federal environmental statutes (such as the 18 Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, etc.), NEPA imposes no substantive constraints on the 19 agency’s ultimate decision to … , allowing for a 60-day public comment period.
Amicus Curiae Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act authorizes the Administrator to prohibit, control, or regulate a fuel or fuel additive if “the emission products will endanger the public health or welfare... .” 42 U.S.C. § 1857F- … Agcy., 515 F.2d 206, 214 (8th Cir. 1975), appeal pending, states that the one principle upon which Clean Air Act cases are in agreement is that the standard for review of agency decisions is the arbitrary
426 U.S. 941Amicus Curiae Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act authorizes the Administrator to prohibit, control, or regulate a fuel or fuel additive if “the emission products will endanger the public health or welfare... .” 42 U.S.C. § 1857F- … Agcy., 515 F.2d 206, 214 (8th Cir. 1975), appeal pending, states that the one principle : upon which Clean Air Act cases are in agreement is i that the standard for review of agency decisions is {
426 U.S. 941Petition for ReHearing — Young v. Cargill
Supreme Court brief · Petition for ReHearing · 2010
The bank argued that it i pond d prop rly to the employee Complain md that as of December 2002, tntertor air testin revealed that the air quality in the building Within a normal range In Opposition … Th bank itself acknowledpes that it provided idditional cleaning stat!
562 U.S. 840Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 15, 2019
Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA (“UARG”), 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014). That is precisely the basis on which this Court rejected a similarly disruptive interpretation of the Clean Air Act in UARG. … Because Congress had not amended the Clean Air Act to provide such a clear regulatory authorization to EPA, the Court rejected EPA’s interpretation as unreasonable. See id. at 321-324.
Respondents Brief — Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Texas, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 15, 2025
Here, no one disputes that under the Hobbs Act, filing comments to an agency can make someone a party for purposes of judicial review. … Amalgamated Bank, 566 U.S. 639, 645 (2012) (cleaned up). b.
Appendix — United States v. Grinnell Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1966
Type FTM-1: Clean-It, Inc. Heavy Duty Anti-Slip Wax, Clean-It, Inc. Heavy Duty Wax, Clean-It, Inc. Wax, Clean-K, Inc. Anti-Slip Wax, Clean-It, Inc. Sam-Kote. Type FTM-3: Clean-It, Inc. … Occasional cleaning is required. Air-Maze Corp Cleveland O Unimaze Air Filter. Model OH. Sizes 1 to 8. Air-Maze Qil-bath-type Filter. Model AOB, Sizes 1 to 8. Models F25 through F550.
384 U.S. 563Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1980
. § 13690)... eee 16 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, ef 8€q. ......... … After a comment period, this rule was made final on September 22, 1978.
449 U.S. 64Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1999
Concessionaire shall maintain Conces- sionaire’s Operating Area in a safe, clean, orderly and attractive condition and in good working order at the times during the Operating Period of the Agreement … The Authority shail have no responsibility or liability for failure to supply heat, steam. air-conditioning, plumbing, and electrical service during any such period, or when Rental Car Concession 1998
528 U.S. 1047
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.