Documents

Appendix — Janik ex rel. Janik v. City of Dallas

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001

and claims under the Clean Water Act, Texas Water Code, and Waste Disposal Act. … (See Clean Water Act, § 402 & Texas Water Code, Chapter 26.)

Reply Brief — North Dakota, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 23, 2021

Duffy Ann Brewster Weeks CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE 114 State Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02109 (617) 359-4077 jduffy@catf.us aweeks@catf.us Counsel for American Lung Association, American Public Health Association … , Appalachian Mountain Club, Clean Air Council, Clean Wisconsin, Conservation Law Foundation, and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Elizabeth Jones CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 660 S.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency v. City of Dallas, Texas (No. 08-252)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

Gallatin Steel Co., 390 F-3d 461, 473 (6th Cir. 2004) (expressly rejecting “diligent prosecution” requirement when applying res judicata to a prior-filed Clean Air Act citizen suit). Appx. … Gallatin Steel Co., 390 F.3d 461, 473 (6th Cir.2004) (expressly rejecting “diligent prosecution” requirement when applying res judicata to a prior-filed Clean Air Act citizen suit).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Onan Corp. v. Industrial Steel Container Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983), “Preemption may be either express or implied, and is com- pelled whether Congress’ command is explic- itly stated in the statute's language or implicitly … Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minn.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Lodi v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2003

Section 6991(8); Section 307(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … Section 2701(23); Section 112(6) of the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

Opposition Brief — Pocono Green, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

That A-128 "comprehensive . . . statewide regulatory scheme" consists of the Sewage Facilities Act, the Clean Streams Law, and the regu- lations that D.E.R. has promulgated pur- suant to those statutes … Id. § 691.207 (Clean Streams Law), § 750.7(a) (Sewage Facilities A-130 Act) .* D.E.R. has promulgated exten- sive regulations pursuant to the Clean Streams Law and the Sewage Facilities Act.

Respondents Brief — Laurence M. Fedora, Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Dec 13, 2017

Circuits holding that the time limit for filing a petition for review under the Clean Air Act is jurisdictional, and he notes that those decisions reach a different result than the Seventh Circuit did … Air Act "exhibited the requisite statement of clear congressional intent to foreclose tolling."

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 16, 2026

Armed Groups Subject Communities to Sweeping and Indiscriminate Daily Acts of Violence. ................................................... 6 2. … MSF defines gender-based violence “any harmful act that is perpetrated against a person’s will, threats of such acts, coercion, and other deprivations of freedom based on socially ascribed gender differences

Respondents Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1998

III, § 2, Cl. 1 ............. passim STATUTES Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365.............. 2, 6, 16 Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3613 .................6. 16 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act … heb) oGndaetc coeens cogs 6ocnseeeee eébeucee 4 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES — Continued Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604(a)................

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017) (No. 16-529)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Midwest Generation, LLC, 720 F.3d 644, 646 (7th Cir. 2013) (Clean Air Act); United States v. Mlaskoch, 2014 WL 1281523, at *10 (D. Minn. Mar. 31, 2014) (Clean Water Act); Mayes v. … and the Natural Gas Act are silent on limitations periods.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 16, 2019

See Damien Schiff, Keep the Clean Water Act Cooperatively Federal—Or, Why the Clean Water Act Does Not Directly Regulate Groundwater Pollution, 42 Wm. & Mary Envtl. … Rev. 1, 15 n.91 (2007) (“Two of the most citizen-enforced programs in environmental law are the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts.”).

Appendices — American Airlines, Inc. v. Davies

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1993

The absurdity of this explanation in the present context is such as to require no further comment. … Nothing in this chap- ter shall prevent said carriers by air, or any class or classes of their employees, both acting through their representatives selected in accordance with provisions of this subchapter

Appendix — Litton Systems, Inc. v. Carroll

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995

Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc., 484 U.S. 49, 57 (1987) (interpreting identical language in the Clean Water Act in the same way). … June 16, 1989) (private action barred where no public comment period) (Exhibit E). In Artesian Water Co. v.

Opposition Brief — Odegard v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

That night petitioner and Pizarrello cleaned the room to prepare for an inspection (Tr. 146). … when Agents Doerr and Doughman commented about the blue coloring on his hands after he rinsed them (Tr. 191).

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021

. § 7411(d), an ancillary provision of the Clean Air Act, did Congress constitutionally authorize the Environmental Protection Agency to issue significant rules – including those capable of reshaping the … Here the Clean Air Act is being misused in ways never intended.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zabkar v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

Returning to his room after leaving it for a brief period, the appellant discovered that Amn Malloy had re- moved her clothing and was lying on his bed. … Emerging from the bathroom with a towel to clean up the spilled drink, the appellant discovered that Amn Malloy had slit her wrists.

Reply Brief — Shannon v. Department of Housing & Urban Development

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1978

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 which utilized similar gen- eral language. … , 1977, PLL, 94-362 for payment of costs in cases lost by the Justice Department even under the several acts such as Tithe VII and the Clean Air Act where fees are explicitly authorized, Presumably

Amicus Brief — Train v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 [hereinafter cited as the *‘Water Pollution Control Act’’ or the **Act’’) established as a national goal the achievement of clean waters in … Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Air and Water Pol- lution, which reported out the Senate version of the Act. He was a floor manager of the bil] and a member of the confer- ence committee.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In Re David C. White, Petitioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 29, 2025

, the Clean Water Act, and the Commerce Clause of the U.S. … Federal Court in Portland, Oregon Systemic Denial of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved The lower court dismissals leave clear violations of the Federal Clean Air and Federal Clean Water

Amicus Curiae Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026

Thus, the law was and is clear: claims over emissions contributing to global climate change are governed exclusively by federal law and the Clean Air Act. … The Court then noted that the availability of any such suit would depend, inter alia, on the preemptive effect of the Clean Air Act.