Documents

Slip Opinion — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2006

Fi- nally, the Clean Water Act's legislative history, if it means anything, goes against Warren's reading of “discharge.” Pp. 6—12. … See Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970, §103, 84 Stat. 108. Today, this requirement can be found in §401 of the Clean Water Act, 86 Stat. 877, codified at 33 U.S.

Respondents Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jun 2, 2021

Duffy Ann Brewster Weeks CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE 114 State Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02109 (617) 359-4077 jduffy@catf.us aweeks@catf.us Kristin Merritt Bronson CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER 1437 Bannock Street … Air Council, Clean Wisconsin, Conservation Law Foundation, and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Brittany E.

Opposition Brief — Mosco v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

See Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary Unabridged, 2028 (2nd ed. 1964) ("Ventilate, ... 1. to circulate fresh air in (a room, etc.), driving out foul air. 2. to circulate in (a room, etc.) … so as to freshen: said of air. 3. to provide with an opening for the escape of air, gas, etc.; to furnish a means for airing ...." “Ventilation, 1. the act or process of ventilating. 2.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency v. City of Dallas, Texas (No. 08-252)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

Gallatin Steel Co., 390 F-3d 461, 473 (6th Cir. 2004) (expressly rejecting “diligent prosecution” requirement when applying res judicata to a prior-filed Clean Air Act citizen suit). Appx. … Gallatin Steel Co., 390 F.3d 461, 473 (6th Cir.2004) (expressly rejecting “diligent prosecution” requirement when applying res judicata to a prior-filed Clean Air Act citizen suit).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — District of Columbia v. Kattan

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) 14 Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) 17, 23 Poythress v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 560 (1986) (fee provision of Clean Air Act should be interpreted like § 1988).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — May v. Shuttle, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

Plaintiffs’ basic job duties included handling baggage, cleaning aircraft, and guiding aircraft to and from passenger gates. … Eastern Air Lines, 701 F. Supp. 865, 869 (D.D.C. 1988).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — DCS Sanitation Management Management Management, Inc. v. Castillo (No. 06-27)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

Restatement, §187, Comment f. … Restatement, §187, Comment e.

Joint Appendix — Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2005

NEWAL OR EXTENSION PERIOD. … or no air disturbance.

Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Forth Corp. v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. (No. 74-1060)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1974

However, the objective of that Act, as evidenced by the Act itself and the regula- tions issued thereunder by the Federal Aviation Adminis- tration, is to control the movement of air traffic and to … Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Nebraska, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 23, 2022

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (cleaned up). … Air Regulatory Grp. V. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324 (2014)).

Application — William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al., Applicants v. Earlene Branch Peterson, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Application · Jul 12, 2020

This may occur if staff who clean the rooms are infected but are not taking proper precautions (wearing a mask, washing their hands, etc.) or are engaging in any improper cleaning practices (using cleaners … Defendants acted arbitrarily and capriciously because, in setting Mr.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Furthermore, the construc- tion ban imposed by the Tenth Circuit is much more ex- treme than the ban required by the Clean Air Act. … In addition, the Tenth Circuit’s ban is much more absolute than the equivalent requirement under the Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United Technologies Corp. v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Review by this Court is essential to clarify the rights of PRPs who clean up contaminated sites and to establish once and for all the applicable limitations periods for parties whose rights are being … ‘(B) Opportunity for comment The Attorney General shall provide an op- portunity to persons who are not named as par- ties to the action to comment on the proposed judgment before its entry by the

Respondents Brief — Key Tronic Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1994

Co : (2 0 er 12 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 708 ..... 16 Onsen Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com- pensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 Alyeska Pipeline … Air Force Consent Order, supra, at 3-6, 12; see Pet. App. A2; J.A. 16-17.

Petitioners Brief — Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980

.--.... 5 yO RTO Tt) > | nie eee es 6 Seventh Amendment ..........0...0000000..... 5 | ae Ce COED pisces. 5, 52 Clean Air Act, Section 211(c) (2) (A) and 29 US.C. 654 (8) (2) ---. … EPA, 427 U.S. 246 (1976) (the Clean Air Act contains no requirement that state implementation plans for air pollution be economically or technologi- cally feasible, much less cost-beneficial) ; Comment

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Congress by enactment of the Clean Water Act has determined that the protection of wetlands and clean water is for the general welfare. … Under this standard, the United States Army Corps of Engineers may under the Clean Water Act deny a permit to build a multi-unit condominium which would cause extreme damage to the wetlands and pollute

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

The nature of petitioner’s injury is damage to his business and property as a‘result of air pollution during the period of the retardation. … Plaintiff Handy would have this Court establish a right to clean air and a safe and healthy environment within the penumbra of the United States Constitution and its amend- ments.

Opposition Brief — Salazar v. Whink Products Co.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co., 33 Colo. App. 99, 517 P.2d 406 (1973). … Uptain, 723 P.2d at 1327, citing Comment J to the Restatement (2d) of Torts § 402A. 9a Appendix A B.

Petitioners Brief — Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2013

See The Clean Water Act Handbook 191-220 (Mark A. Ryan ed., 2d ed. 2003). … Circuit held with regard to the 60-day time limit in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b), it “is jurisdictional in nature.” Med. Waste Inst. v. EPA, 645 F.3d 420, 427 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Opposition Brief — Wetlands Action Network v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Pierce, 719 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir. 1983) 20, 21 Statutes and regulations: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344 (§ 404) 7 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. 2 42 U.S.C. 4332 … In June 2 Petitioners raised several additional claims under NEPA and the Clean Water Act.