Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Petition — County Board of Arlington County v. Richards
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Many communities throughout the country have acted or are considering acting as Arlington has to protect some of their residents from the threats to their health, safety, comfort, convenience and dignity … but no more than 30 days, and not to be to any more than two persons who are visitors at a residence during any period in which another visitor to that residence holds such a permit; and c.
434 U.S. 5Amicus Curiae Brief — Air & Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (2019) (No. 17-1104)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
During that period, the Navy employed approx- imately 4.5 million shipyard workers who potentially could have been exposed to asbestos fibers.” ). '? … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — TNS, Inc. v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
1 To monitor air quality, the Respondent utilized various types of air samplers throughout the plant. … Individuals striking during the cooling-off periods would have forfeited their status as employees under the Act.
516 U.S. 821Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Rice v. Mitchell
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
RULE VIOL 0516833100 MAX OISDAYS MAJ 38 PROFANE LANG/GESTURE/ACT COMMENT 040183 NEW PRISON POLICY FOR TIME CREDIT RULE VIOL 0402833100 MAX 030DAYS MAJ 18 POSSESSING ANY WEAPON CUSTODY 0616823100 CLOSE … TO MAX CUST REV 121682 COMMENT 020182 NEW PRISON POLICY POR TIME CREDIT COMMENT 23181 GOOD TIME POR PAR ELIG 0982 DAYS COMMENT 123181 G OOD TIME POR PAR ELIG 09862 DAYS PF 4-MENU W/DOC 5-MENU 6-BASE
506 U.S. 905Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 18, 2020
Since the Court in American Electric Power held that the Clean Air Act displaced the plaintiffs’ federal common law nuisance claim, there was no reason to address, and the Court did not address, whether … EPA . . . this Court held that the 12 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., authorizes federal regulation of emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. . . . they are therefore within
Slip Opinion — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2006
l Congress passed the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) in 1972. … Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 863, 837 (1984) (considering whether the agency regulation was consistent with “the policy concerns that motivated the {Clean Air Act's] enact ment’
547 U.S. 715Petition for Writ of Certiorari — North Dakota v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (No. 05-628)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Section 313 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … The Department periodically reviews and revises its water quality standards as required by the Clean Water Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1313(c 2A). 4. The Department’s water quality standards, N.D. Admin.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act regulation” for protection. … The Court applied this class-of- activity analysis to the Clean Water Act in United States v.
547 U.S. 715Petition for Writ of Certiorari — GenCorp, Inc. v. Olin Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
On September 8, 1983, after a notice-and-comment period, it placed both the Big D and Fields Brook sites on the National Priority List for clean-up. … In July the US EPA gave public notice of a plan for proposed clean- up of the Big D Site in a draft Record of Decision (hereinafter “ROD”), which provided a 30 day period for public comment thereon
546 U.S. 935Opposition Brief — Cooper v. Armstrong Rubber Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
listed under section 1317(a) of Title 33, (E) any hazardous air pollutant listed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C.A. § 7412], and (F) any imminently hazardous chemical substance or … The current National Ambient Air Quality Standard for lead is 1.5 ug/m?.
510 U.S. 1117Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023
Id. at 2609 (citing Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324; United States Telecom, 855 F.3d at 381). … Utility Air, 573 U.S. at 324.
Opposition — Helmerich & Payne, Inc. v. Rock Island Improvement Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1983
Any permit renewal shall be for a term not to exceed the period of the original permit established by this act. … These local bodies, agencies, authorities or com- 24b [APPENDIX]) panies may submit written comments within a reasonable period established by the Department on the mining appli- cations with respect
461 U.S. 944Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1980
by the Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub. … period in which to comment.
449 U.S. 64Opposition Brief — Arkansas Peace Center v. Arkansas Department of Pollution Control & Ecology
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1994
with EPA’s clean-up activities on a Superfund site.”); Schalk v. … Minn. 1990) (barred claims for injunctive relief under RCRA, CERCLA, Clean Water Act, a state counterpart statute and common law as challenges to an ongoing response action), vacated in nonrelevant
511 U.S. 1017Appendix — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
AP-73 of the National Air Pollution Control Administration, US. … The Cost of Air Pollu- tion Damages-A Status Report. U. S.
422 U.S. 289Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. Crowley
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1955
Criche used kerosene and oil to clean 7 his hands, but he never washed himself at work. … Criche used kerosene and oil to clean his hands, but he never washed himself at work.
348 U.S. 927Opposition Brief — Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1970
[L]ack of clean hands may be overcome by a balancing of interests, particularly where it is the public interest involved. … Such _ approaches would recognize that Section 8 of the Norris-La Guardia Act has some applicability, and is a legislative instruction that weighs heav- ier in the scale than the clean hands doctrine
397 U.S. 926Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act regulation” for protection. … The Court applied this class-of- activity analysis to the Clean Water Act in United States v.
546 U.S. 932Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485 (1996) (cleaned up). … Meat Inspection Act, ERISA, and numerous other statutes.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Manildra Milling Corp. v. OMI Holdings, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
It is directed both to the process for producing LGWS from a _ clean starch feed through hydroclassification,’ and to the LGWS itself. … Rather, once prime starch is obtained by wet separation and sieving, the prime starch fraction is then air-dried and later subjected to a Series of separations or fractionation via air classification
510 U.S. 1164
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.