Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.99s
Appendix — Polakow's Realty Experts, Inc. v. Alabama
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1943
State, 185 A. 93, the Superior Court of Delaware declared a dry cleaning law unconstitutional. … It could only act through an agent.
319 U.S. 750Appendix E — Kelly v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix E · 1994
(C) Actions arising out of any other act or failure to act by any person or public agency. … The public shall be consulted during the environ- mental impact statement process and views shall be solicited during a public comment period not to be less than 60 days.
510 U.S. 1041Opinion — Askew v. American Waterways Operators, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1973
and $1161 of the Federal Act when it comes to damages ‘to property interests, for the Federal Act reaches only costs of cleaning up. … While the Federal Act is concerned only with actual clean-up costs incurred by the Federal Government, the State of Florida is concerned with its own clean-up costs.
411 U.S. 325Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — Production Plated Plastics, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1992
Likewise, the Clean Air Act notes that for certain limited subsections, “operator” includes “any person who is a senior management personnel or a corporate officer.” 42 U.S.C. § 7413(h). … Water Act and 20 Clean Air Act is redundant and the standards for such joint liability contained therein, including the restrictions to particular officers in particular instances are nullified.
506 U.S. 820Appellants Brief — United States v. Pullman Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appellants Brief · 1947
in respect to antitrust to come into court with clean hands, are irrelevant. … An analogy to the Holding Company Act is in point here. That Act, in intent and design, is at once a corporate securities and an antitrust act.’
331 U.S. 865Appendix — City of New York, New York v. Catskill Mountain Chapter of Trout Unlimited (No. 06-729)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2006
under the Clean Water Act). . … Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. Ii. Background Water transfers occur routinely and in many different contexts across the United States.
Joint Appendix — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · May 9, 2019
JA19 Final Responsiveness Summary for Public Comment Period on EPA UIC Draft Permit No. HI595001 (1995) (ER321, ER322) (excerpt) ....... … STATUTORY BACKGROUND The Clean Water Act 25.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946
Courts Below Are in Direct ME Conflict with Decisions i in Other “iret. as "L0- 17 ie ; = Seat Dae mg mm A. with the Second Cire mit,” airs 10; aia we B. … and cleaned the floors.
327 U.S. 173Amicus Curiae Brief — Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
of Indian wars, the treaty period. the Indian removal period, the reservation period, and the allotment period, all aspects of a long- diseredited federal policy of suppressing (if not eliminat- ing … month President Bush signed into law the 1990 ‘Clean Air Act Amendments, putting all tribes, including Alaska Native villages, exercising ‘“‘substantial governmental du- ties and powers” over any “
501 U.S. 775Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Boyd v. Black
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Yet we naively expect public officials to crawl through that swamp ON A DAILY BASIS AND COME OUT CLEAN AND UNSOILED. ...1 am here today to tell you that if we want clean government, it’s time to drain … On July 21, 1982, the investigative report was aired.
493 U.S. 853Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. … The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to protect and_ restore vital wetlands and SAV areas.
546 U.S. 932Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Spawr Optical Research, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Air or gas compressors, n.e.s.! Air heaters, portable, fuel, fired, n.e.s. … Steam cleaning Steam generating power boilers, engines, and turbines, n.e.s.
508 U.S. 913Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — California Highway Commission v. Keith
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1975
then, and defendants themselves deserve credit for some of it.’* The Environ- mental Protection Agency [hereinafter EPA], acting | pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1857- 1857/1, has been … Copies of final statements shall in all cases be sent to the Environmental Protection Agency to as- sist it in carrying out its responsibilities under section 309 of the Clean Air Act.
420 U.S. 908Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
After consideration of the comments received in the sixty day comment period, the commission may adopt the rule in an open meeting. … The Act’s matching funds provisions function slightly differently during the general election period than durnng the primary election period.
562 U.S. 1060Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2025
FRANK KENDALL, III, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE; JOHN D. DEGOES, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING SURGEON GENERAL OF THE AIR FORCE; JOHN P. … Collin, 881 F.3d at 429 (quoting Bowen, 487 U.S. at 893 (cleaned up)).
Amicus Brief — Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978
To the same effect are: the Clean Air Act (“any party“), “ discussed in Delaware Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 62 F.R.D. 353 (D. … Del. 1974); the Noise Pollution Control Act (“any party“), “ patterned after the Clean Air Act; the Voting Rights Act Extension of 1975 (“prevailing party“) “; the Toxic Substances Control Act (“in
434 U.S. 412Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Javaar Yavonnie Kalem Watkins, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 15, 2023
Randle, 39 F.4th at 536 (cleaned up). … Strong, 826 F.3d at 1115 (cleaned up), quoting Fed. R. Evid. 403.
Appendix — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
AP-73 of the National Air Pollution Control Administration, US. … The Cost of Air Pollu- tion Damages-A Status Report. U. S.
422 U.S. 289Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 26, 2021
Air Act (“CAA”) restricts states from even “attempt[ing] to enforce” tampering laws against manufacturers’ nationwide conduct, allowing this case to proceed would itself violate the very right petitioners … Air Act proscribes” ignores the numerous post-sale enforcement mechanisms the CAA directs EPA to employ—such as in-use testing, defect reporting, warranty compliance, recalls, and the CAA’s antitampering
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 16, 2018
Air & Liquid Sys. Corp., 129 A.3d 984 (Md. 2015) ............................................................ 15 McIndoe v. … During these periods the trusts pay no money to claimants.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.