Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.77s
Respondents Brief — Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. NLRB
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1979
Employees may not leave the plant during the 22-minute rest periods, and it is not feasible for them to leave during their lunch period. … How much will it cost the employee and/or employer to have this portion, of that quality, served with a given, clean efficiency?
441 U.S. 488Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Town of Rye v. Skinner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
" See, e.g., the citizens * io se suit provisions of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604. te Scalia at 385. 45 important aspect of that common law. … tion of the comment period.
498 U.S. 1024Reply Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2009
The Structure and History of the Clean Water Act Do Not Support IE II iiisiccccidaiianienssabahionishensteniinaniindes 20 iv The Opinions of Congressional Staff Who Neither Vote on a Bill Nor Express … No §316(a)-style variance was needed, * Clean Water Act §§301, 306, 33 U.S.C. §§1311, 1316.
556 U.S. 208Opposition Brief — Cris Realms, Inc. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
V ' 7,20 Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seg.: § 404, 33 U.S.C. 1344 3 § 404(b), 33 U.S.C. 1344(b) 19 Flood Control Act of 1971, 33 U.S.C. 701 4 Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act … of 1899, 33 U.S.C. 403, or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1977, 33 U.S.C. 13844.
532 U.S. 904Amicus Curiae Brief — Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, et al., U.S. , 106 S. Ct. 3088 (1986) ("Delaware Valley I") «+++ + .25 Page Pennsylvania, et al. v. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, et al., _U.S.__, 107 S.Ct. 3078 (1987) ("Delaware Valley II") ... . Pilot Life Ins. Co. v.
489 U.S. 101Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 28, 2018
Riverkeeper, the Clean Water Act directed EPA to set standards based on the “best technology available.” 556 U.S. 208, 212-15 (2009). … EME Homer City Generation, L.P., the Clean Air Act charged EPA with regulating interstate emissions, without resolving how to allocate reductions where multiple states contribute to a downwind problem.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
PRINGOE, Commanding Officer Naval Air Station Miramar, Respondents. … The Navy has pre- sented no evidence that the plaintiff was either sloppy or un- clean.
449 U.S. 919Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 5, 2020
Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq., the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq., the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, the Archeological Resources Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470 … , 42 U.S.C.A. § 6901, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 7401, and the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300f.
Opposition Brief — Village of Los Ranchos de Albuquerque v. Stone
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
AAS ae OTE NP IDS 7 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 ef seq. ..................cc0000es 4 BS EITC. … In addition to their NEPA claim, petitioners alleged violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq., the National Historic Preservation
506 U.S. 817Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jul 17, 2023
Air Act. 467 U.S. at 840, 842. … But to state the obvious, this is not a Clean Air Act case, and what the question presented seeks to have overruled is Chevron’s interpretive methodology.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 11, 2019
The Federal Courts Improvement Act, Pub. L. … This confusion is exemplified by decisions over whether the time limit for circuit-court review of EPA rules issued under the Clean Air Act is jurisdictional.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Smith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1984
Prohibited acts A Unlawful acts (a) Any person who-- (1) contrary to section 952, 953, or 957 of this title, knowingly or intentionally imports or exports a controlled substance, (2) contrary to … Not authorized for transportation by air.
469 U.S. 826Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
‘The reason the effervescence (sic) is here is when they started construction again they had to clean the dirt and accumulation. … The relation- ship of these two subsections has been summarized as fol- lows in the Drafting Committee’s Comment (1969) to see.
449 U.S. 843Amicus Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Air Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 7423 (Supp. … Under § 110 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410 (Supp.
467 U.S. 1248Transcript of Record — Parker v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1943
In fhe case of 25-pound bags, yes, air. … Yes.“ — } aya) aire Pa ether : ; - KE...
317 U.S. 341Jurisdictional Statement — Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1984
Air Act Amendments of 1977, 55 So.Cal. … See Stensvaac, State Regulations of Nuclear Generating Plants Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 55 So.Cal. L.Rev. 511 (1982); Pac. Legal Found. v.
464 U.S. 238Petition — Fedders Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
4 and 5, place period after “Room Air Conditioners” and delete all language enclosed in parentheses … as to the performance character- isties of any air conditioner including, but not limited to, air cooling, heating, cleaning, circula- tion, dehumidification or humidification, efficiency and quietness
429 U.S. 818Appendix — Walker Towing Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1989
The entry states that the crew was ‘‘[w]ashing ice through main locks cleaning snow from lock walls and steps. Cleaning pusherboat off and breaking ice in aux locks.’? … Clean Coal Terminals.
493 U.S. 813Appendix — Aberdeen & Rockfish R. Co. v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Over a period of time, however, . … AP-73 of the National Air Pollution Control U.S.
422 U.S. 289Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 7, 2022
In response, the Attorney General asserts that the “text and structure” of the Clean Air Act (at issue in Engine Manufacturers) “differ markedly from what Congress enacted in the TCA.” Opp. 34. … But the Clean Air Act, like the TCA, preempts state “standards.”
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.