Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Theresa Ortloff, Petitioner v. Dave Trimmer, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 19, 2019

Regardless of comments from former employees, the data demonstrates there is a market gap. … We expect media coverage to air on King 5 tonight at 11:00p.m.

Opposition — Shell Oil Co. v. West Michigan Environmental Action Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

The closing colloquy that day included the following comments: [Tr. pp 3222-3223] MR. SMITH: Judge, | would just like to make a requ- est. … The biggest share of the impacts go to recreational activ- ities, clearly not air, water or natural resources, particu- larly in terms of noise, that doesn’t go to air, water or natural resources.

Appendix — Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1987

In fact, United’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Richard Ferris commented: We have got 500 pre-hires, right? … As we noted in that case: [E}]ven if the Brotherhood were correct in contending that the railroad lacked clean hands, Section 8 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act would not of necessity preclude the issuance

Appendix — Bastone v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1976

The agreement may continue for a long period of time and include the performance of many transactions. … Under this circumstance, where there is an invited response, such comments have been previous- ly approved by this court. United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donahey v. Livingstone

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

The parties subsequently renewed the lease for a period of ten years, thereby creating a continuous landlord-tenant relationship for a twenty year period. St. … Throughout the time period relevant to this case, St.

Petition — Pacific Legal Foundation v. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Right now, the Congress is deliberating over amendments to the Clean Air Act which will impose relatively stringent emissions requirements effective over the same time frame. … Side effects of air bag installation. Some concerns were expressed in the comments about air bags that might be grouped as possible undesirable side effects.

Joint Appendix — United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 2007

As a result of the Authority’s decision to considerably extend the public comment period on the DGEIS, hundreds of residents of the two counties had the opportunity to add their comments, criticisms … * Holding 15 Authority meetings during the eight-month public comment period.

Reply Brief — California Sea Urchin Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Susan Combs, Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 28, 2018

Riverkeeper, the Clean Water Act directed EPA to set standards based on the “best technology available.” 556 U.S. 208, 212-15 (2009). … EME Homer City Generation, L.P., the Clean Air Act charged EPA with regulating interstate emissions, without resolving how to allocate reductions where multiple states contribute to a downwind problem.

Opposition Brief — Polmar Fisheries, Inc. v. Hurlburt

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

As of that date, there were at least seven crewmembers aboard for whom Hurlburt was cooking, and, in addition to her cooking function, Hurlburt cleaned staterooms. … Petitioner amply aired its concerns, evidence and testimony on seamanship and related issues, as to Polmar and/or Northland.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Harris v. Federal Aviation Administration

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004

Clean Air Implementation Project v. Environmental Protection Agency, 150 F.3d 1200, 1204 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (citing Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation, 497 U.S. 871, 891 (1990)). … Clean Air Implementation Project v. EPA, 150 F.3d 1200, 1204 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (internal quotation omitted).

Opposition Brief — Jenkins v. Missouri

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 107 S.Ct. 3078 (1987) (hereinafter “Delaware Valley II’). … In Delaware Valley II, plaintiff had obtained an award of attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 7604(d), i.e., section 304(d) of the Clean Air Act, for the work of their at- torneys in securing the implementation

Opposition Brief — Monsanto Company, Petitioner v. John L. Durnell

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jun 9, 2025

Harris, 565 U.S. 452, 455-56 (2012) (cleaned up). … We need to discuss where we are on each of these topics as well as well as finalize a letter of comment to the German Addendum. Steve has provided some valuable comments in a recent message.

Petitioners Brief — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1974

(Emphasis supplied ) The Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 1857c-9 (Section 114 of the Act) provides in pertinent part that: (a) Authority. ... … The Air Pollution Control Act (Pet. App.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Villegas

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

Navigating the Clean Water Act. … Jd. at Comment.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Air and Liquid Systems Corp., et al., Petitioners v. Roberta G. DeVries, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John B. DeVries, Deceased, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 24, 2018

User Activity Comment Sheets (3) VOLUME II a. Cover and spine b. … Air drying prior to firing is unnecessary and, in fact, is undesirable since shrinkage is increased.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William L. Huntress, et al., Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 30, 2020

See also Sealed Air Corp. v. … Water Act, or the wetlands portion of the Clean Water Act. [33] 13.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Martino v. Michigan Window Cleaning Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1946

Courts Below Are in Direct ME Conflict with Decisions i in Other “iret. as "L0- 17 ie ; = Seat Dae mg mm A. with the Second Cire mit,” airs 10; aia we B. … and cleaned the floors.

Appendix — Eastern Pilots Merger Committee v. Continental Airlines, Inc

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2002

Specifically, the Court stated: The injunction surely obliged Kovacs to clean up the site. … In late January 1986, after an impasse, the NMB declared a mandatory thirty-day “cooling off” period under the Rail- way Labor Act (RLA), after which both the pi- lots and the carrier could engage

Petition — Schwarz v. Coastal Resources Management

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

ental to Petitioner's health,home,garden, clean water,clean air,equal justice under the law, and her Constitutional and Civil Rights, are the reasons for this suit. … in this chapter shall in any way affect any requ- irement (1)established by the Federal Wa- ter Pollution Control Act,as amended,or the Clean Air Act,as amended,or (2) est- ablished by the Federal

Respondents Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Sep 15, 2023

The question there concerned the term “stationary source,” as used in 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. See Chevron, 467 U.S. at 848-851. … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7604, the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1365, and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. 1540(g).