Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490 (1999) (“Of the comments, the vast majority were addressed to the perceived health threat that the sites might pose. … The second and even clearer distinction is in the Clean Air Act (CAA), which provides that: The Administrator shall periodically review . ..
531 U.S. 1070Amicus Curiae Brief — Islander East East Pipeline Pipeline Co., LLC v. McCarthy (No. 08-367)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
a casmeonee 17 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.... 8 a spiapuctiuie 8 rad cecintacreninbinbtedeuvesones (i), passim ET SE ea (i), passim ES 9,10 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. … The Clean Water Act Among other things, the CWA is designed to “re- store and maintain the chemical, physical, and bio- logical integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 23, 2023
US Airways, Inc., 589 F.3d 30, 36-37 (1st Cir. 2009); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … As petitioners explain, the court of appeals suggested that Coal Act premiums “ ‘accrue for each tax period.’ ” Pet. 22 (quoting Sunnyside, 146 F.3d at 1279).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
“The standard rule [is] that the limitations period commences when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action.” Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. … DTSC circulated the draft RAP for public review and comment during a thirty-day comment period, and held a public meeting concerning the draft RAP on April 5, 1995. /d. 4 15.
543 U.S. 869Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of Los Angeles v. Kern County
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
Davis, 331 F.3d 665, 666 (9th Cir. 2003), which merely held that a California regulation banning MTBE in gasoline was not preempted by the Clean Air Act and in no way involved Commerce Clause analysis … relied in dismissing Plaintiffs’ Clean Water Act claim).
560 U.S. 939Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 6, 2022
See Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843-48 (EPA had delegated authority to interpret statutory term “major stationary sources” of air pollution, in Clean Air Act, either broadly or narrowly). … Specifically, in Chevron, unlike here, Congress provided a generally defined term of art--“major stationary sources” of air pollution--and the EPA had the delegated authority, under the Clean Air Act,
Respondents Brief — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1985
Sections 301 and 309 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1319. … NRDC, 421 U.S. 60, 75 (1975) (Clean Air Act). Instead, a court must find only that EPA’s construc- For direct dischargers, compare 33 U.S.C. 1311(b) (1) and (2) with 33 U.S.C. 1316.
470 U.S. 116Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cannon v. Gates (No. 08-683)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
of the Administrative Procedures Act. … integrity of the structures; e Capping of contaminated soils or sludges, where needed to reduce migration of hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants into soil, ground or surface water, or air
Appendices — Producer Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2004
Comments addressing the questions set out in this notice may also be filed by September 3, 2003. … quality standards pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.§ 7401 et seg.), to the extent that activities authorized under this Act significantly affect the air quality of any State.
540 U.S. 1141Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality. .......... 20 21 99 ili bo The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to protect and restore vital … The Bay partners need broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction to improve water quality.
547 U.S. 715Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
Castaways asks the Court to declare the Florida Clean Indoor Air Act (FCIAA), Fla. Stat. … —This part may be cited by the popular name the “Florida Clean Indoor Air Act.” FCIAA Fla.
Petition — Pacific Legal Foundation v. Department of Transportation
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
Right now, the Congress is deliberating over amendments to the Clean Air Act which will impose relatively stringent emissions requirements effective over the same time frame. … Side effects of air bag installation. Some concerns were expressed in the comments about air bags that might be grouped as possible undesirable side effects.
444 U.S. 830Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 18, 2023
See also Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, H.R. Rep. … The judiciary stood as the one restraint on the political branches’ relentless march during that period. See id. at 1316.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 18, 2018
(A) .................................................. 24, 119a Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ................................... 32 42 U.S.C. 7521(a)(1) ....................................... … But in that case a provision of the Clean Air Act spoke directly to the agency decision at issue, and required EPA to regulate any air pollutant which the agency concluded endangered public health or welfare
Reply Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2014
It merely observes that in cases examining ambiguous sections of the Clean Air Act, the Court has refused to read in “an authorization to consider costs that has elsewhere, and so often, been expressly … EPA’s attempt to amalogize § 7412(n)(1)(A) to other sections of the Clean Air Act suffers from the same flaw: they are not comparable.
Reply Brief — National Ass'n v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
More recently, in deciding whether an EPA decision under the Clean Air Act was ripe for review, the Court explained: The question before us here is purely one of statutory interpretation that would … The relevant subsection of EPA’s regulation, 40 C.F.R. § 123.61(a)(1), requires the agency to provide a comment period “during which interested members of the public may express their views on the
551 U.S. 644Reply Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
More recently, in deciding whether an EPA decision under the Clean Air Act was ripe for review, the Court explained: The question before us here is purely one of statutory interpretation that would … The relevant subsection of EPA’s regulation, 40 C.F.R. § 123.61(a)(1), requires the agency to provide a comment period “during which interested members of the public may express their views on the
549 U.S. 1105Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Air Act, § 110(a), 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a) _....... 8-9 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, Pub. … § 271.21(a) (emphasis added).* EPA explained the dis- 2 This arrangement contrasts with State Implementation Plans under the Clean Air Act, for example, where state revisions to the plans are not
501 U.S. 1206Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Manufacturers Ass'n of Tri-County v. Knepper
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club, Delaware Valley Council for Clean Air. Philadelphia Area Project on Occupational Safety and Health. … (2) EPA list of hazardous air pollutants prepared pursuant to section 112 of the Federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7412).
480 U.S. 929Petition — Morrison v. Stetson
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
The slate is wiped clean: As a matter of federal contract law, it seems clear that the petitioners and the Air Force contracted with respect to this well-established principle of mili- tary law. … This law, like the Doctor Draft Act, authorized the President to make special draft calls for physicians under age thirty-five.
444 U.S. 828
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.