Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

SE h'n-b GLH nlkk-r 0 0009408 b R60 54064 ORO OS® 3 Statutes: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. ......... 15 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compen- sation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 960i … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7601 ef seq. 16 conflict among the courts of appeals, (2) the possibility that the issue may have limited importance in many cases, and (3) the fact-specific nature of the inquiry

Petitioners Reply Brief — Exxon Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1981

basis of a qualified and non-binding opinion, there will be nothing to bar the agency from deciding that the Rule is applicable to Peti- tioner at a later point in time when the 60-day statu- tory period … EPA, 622 F.2d 260 (6th Cir. 1980) (suit challenging certain proceedings under the Clean Air Act was proper before the termination of the proceedings because their very existence was impairing business

Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

Reg. 37,054 REE NEE AL SS SEE 4,13 Miscellaneous EPA, Clean Water Rule Response to Comments, available at https://www.epa.gov/cleanwaterrule/ response-comments-clean-water-rule- definition-waters-united-states … “Whether initial 4 The agencies’ Response to Comments is available at https://www.epa.gov/cleanwaterrule/response-comments-clean- water-rule-definition-waters-united-states. 14 subject-matter jurisdiction

Opposition Brief — CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

The Court of Appeals found that, ‘‘[aJs ‘luck’ would have it,’’ Radutzky ‘‘only destroyed the parts of | It is no coincidence that the broadcast was aired during a ‘‘sweeps’’ period—one of three months … But, the Court noted, ‘‘[n]o- body cleans house as selectively as Radutzky did.’’

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chevron Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. San Mateo County, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 22, 2022

Air Act. … Air Act.”

Reply Brief — Venegas v. Mitchell

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1990

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Counsel for Clean Air, 488 U.S. 711 (1987) .....-- 5, 7, 8,9, 15 Pharr v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Counsel for Clean Air, supra, 488 U.S. 711, recognized contingent fees for attorneys in excess of the § 1988 awards is not persuasive.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985

White Martins Nordeste A-116 CLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONS . Section 301(b) of the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1311(b) (1976 & Supp. … Section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. (& Supp.

Amicus Brief — United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1985

Bacccrcccccecceccssccseccccccccsccnscscee 10 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 ef seq. pi DIE Co) of)? … See Section 208(i)(2), Clean Water Act, 33 U S.C. 1288(1)(2).

Transcript of Record — Clark's Ferry Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1934

boxes and truck boxes; cleaning smokestacks, air-brake equipment, and front ends of loco- motives; checking locomotive tool equipment, cleaning ash and cinder pits; operating turntables, drying sand … boxes and truck boxes; cleaning smokestacks, air-brake equipment, and front ends of loco- motives; checking locomotive tool equipment, cleaning ash and cinder pits; operating turntables, drying sand

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cameron Watkins, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 7, 2026

. comment. point from the 4 See State v. … acting officer." officer.”

Supplemental Brief — Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. James

Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1991

Gorsuch, 667 F.2d 215 (1st Cir. 1981), disregarded separate corporate forms to enforce the federal environ- mental policy embodied in the Clean Air Act, without plodding through the “heavily fact specific … We cannot per- ceive why the Clean Air Act and CERCLA should have different standards. The government’s brief provides no explanation.

Amicus Curiae Brief — U.S. Army Corp of Eng'rs v. Hawkes Co., 136 S. Ct. 615 (2015) (No. 15-290)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Page(s) ee ceirenessmecseeenens 4, 6, 10, 15 DB Ee We crescccssnssemsemsemccecsesvscssenenenense ili Clean Water Act, Pub. L. … Chase, Comments of the Nat’ Ass'n of Counties Re: Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act 12 (Docket ID EPA-HQ-OW-2011 0880-15504) (Nov. 14, 2014), .....000..-. eee

Prologue — Rubenstein v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 2005

Air Act, during renovation of a 100-year-old building owned by their family. … Air Act (“CAA”), in 4- violation of 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(1), and that they conspired to do so, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371.

Respondent Brief in Opposition — Maddox v. Shroyer

Supreme Court brief · Respondent Brief in Opposition · 1962

or independent contractor carries on his ‘activities, not only at the time when the concession 4s tet, or ‘the ° contractor employed, but also during the entire period in which the concessionaire or … Justice Srewarr stated (P8a): “As to the claim based upon neglige nee, for which the New Jersey Wrongful Dealth Act clearly gives - a right of action, 2 we agree with the-Court of Appeals that “the

Amicus Curiae Brief — Huebner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

II THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT EXEMPTS FROM REGULATION ACTIVITIES SUCH AS THOSE PERFORMED BY THE HUEBNERS Section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act, codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1344(f), provides … III CONGRESS INTENDED THE AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTIONS TO THE CLEAN WATER ACT TO APPLY TO A FULL RANGE OF AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES Although the piain language of the exemptions to the Clean Water Act leaves

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian Grimm, Petitioner v. Maryland

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 19, 2018

(cleaned up). … (cleaned up).

Appendix VOL II — Schudel v. General Electric Co.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix VOL II · 1998

Most of these chemicals are heavier than air c. Many of the chemicals were air borne therefore were breathable. d. … It is relatively short periods of exposure without 6 A-189 loss of consciousness.

Opposition Brief — Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'n

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002

° Clean Air Act Cases Air, like water, moves freely across state lines, and the Clean Air Act, like the CWA, therefore recognizes a more prominent role for the federal government than does SMCRA … Act, RCRA and Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Our Children's Earth Foundation Foundation v. Environmental Protection Agency (No. 08-225)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008

Air Act (“CAA”) mandatory duty to make some formal decision as to whether or not to revise certain air pollution regulations. 870 F.2d 892, 900 (2nd Cir. 1989). … Circuit did hold that it could not infer a mandatory duty from the “from the overall scheme” of the specific Clean Air Act provisions in issue in that case, not because the court found it always improper

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Park v. Huff

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1975

For the firm fixed price of $102,182.28 appellant was required to provide specified custodial services at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona during the period from 1 July 1971 through 30 June 1972. … For the firm fixed price of $102,182.28 appellant was required to pro- vide specified custodial services at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona during the period from |!