Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.24s
Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019
Code Ann. § 49-17-34(2) (“All rules, regulations and standards relating to air quality, water quality or air emissions or water discharge standards . . . shall be consistent with and shall not exceed the … Congress included no such exception in the Clean Water Act.
Memorandum — City of Highland Park v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976
Under the Clean Air Act the Administrator was directed to establish national ambient air standards by April 30, 1971. 42 U.S.C. 1857c-4(a) (1). … The court of appeals agreed that petitioners’ fail- ure to comply with the notice provision of Section 304 deprived the district court of jurisdiction under the Clean Air Act (Pet. App. A23-A25).
424 U.S. 927Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McGovern v. Town of Wilton
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992
And Steve made the comment that he would do his level best. … Of this good kid who had a clean record. And I heard the case. And I was convinced...
506 U.S. 873Jurisdictional Statement — Federal Election Commission v. McConnell United States Senator
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 2003
STUDY AND REPORT ON CLEAN MONEY CLEAN ELECTIONS LAWS. … (B) EFFECTS OF CLEAN MONEY CLEAN ELECTIONS.
539 U.S. 974Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 6, 2025
Air Regul. Grp. v. … When compressor facilities are proposed, the analysis must also describe how the proposed action will be made to comply with applicable State Implementation Plans developed under the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
However, the EPA appeal resulted in the EPA filing suit against Signal for violation of the Clean Air Act. … pay a penalty of $100,000 for proceeding with construction in violation of the Clean Air Act.
510 U.S. 1191Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hanousek v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
11 ee ee RF ee 17 Books, Treatises, Periodical John C. … See Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1319%c) (1994); Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c) (1994); Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d) (1994).
528 U.S. 1102Appendix — Gulf Refining Co. v. Black Warrior Towing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1956
CARGO: Clean petroleum products. 5. APPROXIMATE LOADING DATE: On or about February 18th, 1952. 6, PERIOD: Consecutive voyages for one year from date of initial loadi ng. 7. … PREVIOUS CARGO; Clean petroleum products ll. PUMPING: By and for account of Owner.
352 U.S. 832Record and brief — Deltona Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
.... 16 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. … That Act was amended in 1977, and renamed the Clean Water Act.
455 U.S. 1017Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 13, 2024
At the time, neither the Patent Act itself, nor the Administrative Procedure Act (enacted six years prior), required the PTO to subject its regulations to notice and comment. … All throughout the 1952 to 1999 period, de jure, the APA applied to the PTO’s rulemaking processes much like it applied to any other agency.
Transcript of Record — Mitchell v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1941
periodicals; nor porter service, soap, nor facilities _ for meals being served in said car; nor clean toilet facilities with running hot and cold water for flushing purpeses and disinfectant; and this … It was air conditioned, had hot and coid running water, tables, carpet, mirrors, ‘wash basins with good soap, clean linen towels, and separate flushable toilets for men and women.
313 U.S. 80Reply Brief — Jake's Fireworks, Inc., Petitioner v. Consumer Product Safety Commission, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 24, 2025
It held that EPA’s order “mark[ed] the ‘consummation’ of the agency’s decisionmaking process” because “EPA’s ‘deliberation’ over whether the [challengers] are in violation of the [Clean Water] Act is at … As CPSC explains, Her Majesty involved “letters that expressed ‘a definitive position’ by a senior agency official [EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation] who ‘was speaking for the
Respondents Brief — Kleppe v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1976
Allen, 396 U.S. 168 (1969) 1 99 STATUTES: Clean Air Act of 1970 b * 99 National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. … pol- lution is deemed acceptable, as well as legal, under the Clean Air Act.
427 U.S. 390Transcript of Record — Union Insulting & Construction Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1926
(Act of August 1. 1892. as amended by Act of Mareh 3. 19123.) 3. … , and cleaned of oil or grease with benzine.
271 U.S. 121Amicus Curiae Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
The inescapable and unrefuted fact is that PCBs have background levels in the natural environment -- in the air, ' water, and soil. … may act later to cause damage." [Prosser] at 348.
540 U.S. 1103Opinion — American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1931
In Hartranft > Wiegmann, 121 U. 8, 609, 613, 615, this Coutt -eonsidered the meaning of the words ‘‘manufactures of shells” and held that ‘‘cleaning’ off the outer layer of the shell by acid, and then … Clean- American Fruit Growers, Inc. vs. Brogdex Company. 7. ing and ginning cotton does not rhake the renting cotton a manu- _ facture of cotton And in Anheuser-Busch Assn. Vv.
283 U.S. 1Reply Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2017
Garner, READING LAW: THE INTERPRETATION OF STE EET SR NE See 5 vi Clean Air Act Amendments, Pub. L. 95-95, oe Sf A, RR Te ER: 18, 20 Clean Water Act of 1977, Pub. … Air Act. 42 U.S.C
Opposition Brief — Wallace v. Methodist Hospital System
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
The federal Clean Air Act mandated that a nn 6 BO ETION, De eh oe) a certain employers take affirmative steps to reduce air pollution. … Tr. 626 (Hahus). 14 Tr. 39-41 (Clean Air Act); Tr. 247 (Wallace); Tr. 503 (Reggie Wallace); Tr. 626-27, 631 (Hahus). 15 Tr. 39-41 (discussion of Clean Air Act); Tr. 247 (Wallace); Tr. 503 (Reggie Wallace
535 U.S. 1078Petition for Writ of Certiorario — Pacific Lumber Co. v. Marbled Murrelet
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorario · 2000
We ' See, e.g., Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f); Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2618(d); Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, 30 U.S.C. (Supp. … When interpreting the fee provision under the ESA, courts have looked to cases regarding these other statutes, including the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f) and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365
528 U.S. 1115Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Estelle's Place, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council For Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 726 (1987). … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711, 715 (1986); see also City of Burlington v.
562 U.S. 1219
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.