Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hoover v. National Transportation Safety Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995

Hoover would be comfortable, and he even made the comment—and I will—if I can find it, I will read it into the record. He talked about monitoring for a three- to six-month period. … to the satisfaction of the Federal Air Surgeon that the duties authorized by the class of medical certifi- cate applied for can be performed without endanger- ing air commerce during the period in

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

, cca craeceadinlinninmiaeani 5, 16 I 11 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401 et seq. ..............0.00066.. 6,13 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387 .................00 13 Coastal Zone Management … Petitioner's arguments could also threaten standing to challenge statutes with substantive requirements such as the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251-1387, or the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seg

Amicus Curiae Brief — Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Petitioner v. Tesla Energy Operations, Inc., fka SolarCity Corporation

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 19, 2018

Lung Ass’n, State of the Air 9 (2017), available at http://www.lung.org/assets/documents/ healthy-air/state-of-the-air/state-of-the-air-2017.pdf. … Id. at 41; see also National Ass’n for the Advancement of Colored People & Clean Air Task Force, Fumes Across the Fence-Line: The Health Impacts of Air Pollution from Oil and Gas Facilities 26 (2017),

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — 3550 Stevens Creek Associates v. Barclays Bank of California

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

App. 13 the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1317, and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412. … Asbestos is classified as a “toxic pollutant” under the Clean Water Act and a “hazardous air pollutant” under the Clean Air Act. 33 U.S.C. § 1317; 42 USC. § 7412; see 40 C.FR. Part 122, App.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

air, —. … See EPA's Clean Air Budget and the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Budget: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Clean Air, Wetlands, Private Property, and Nuclear Safety of the Senate Comm. on Environment and

Respondents Brief — ExxonMobil Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Incorporated, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jun 3, 2025

Statutory and Regulatory Background The Clean Air Act exists “to protect and enhance the quality of the Nation’s air resources so as to promote the public health and welfare and the productive capacity … The only instability in the law arose when petitioners injected novel Clean Air Act interpretations and standing theories into this case.

Opposition Brief — Alabama ex rel. Siegelman v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

.-. 6 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act eis WN MEI nc nn isso cscececccecesncnnsen 2 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. … EPA considered all pubiic comments as required by CERCLA and its regula- tions.* In fact, EPA went so far as to reevaluate its decision based upon after-the-fact comments by Alabama legislators.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Citizens Electric Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1992

Sa eee ae eae 12 Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, §205 ................ 17 Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 33 U.S.C. … The ground water was to be cleaned up by extracting the contaminated water and treating it by air-stripping following by vapor phase carbon adsorption.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — West Penn Power Co. v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1976

STATEMENT On September 13, 1973, pursuant to Section 113 (a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1857¢e-8(a)(1), the Administrator of the Environ- mental Protection Agency sent petitioner … Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857¢-5(a) (3).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Loper Bright Enterprises, et al., Petitioners v. Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 21, 2023

There is no reason to overrule that decision unless the Court believes that it was wrong to interpret “stationary source” for purposes of the nonattainment provisions of the Clean Air Act as meaning the … The proper interpretation of the Clean Air Act, insofar as it applies to climate change, provides a prime illustration.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cedar Point Oil Co. v. Sierra Club

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

General Motors involved a state implementation plan ("SIP") that regulated emissions from automobile painting operations under the Clean Air Act ("CAA"). Id. at 534. … Rodgers, Jr., Environmental Law: Air and Water 144 (1986).

Joint Appendix — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · Nov 16, 2020

See Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401(c) (Congressional statement that the goal of the Clean Air Act is “to encourage or otherwise promote reasonable Federal, State, and local governmental actions . . . … In addition, Plaintiff’s claims are preempted by the Clean Air Act.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roberts v. Alaska (No. 07-631)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007

air, and water; to teach and practice individual lifestyles which enhance clean air, earth, and water; to operate the Earth Cycle Program and to distribute food which , is presently being wasted in … To awaken social, political, and fraternal groups to the importance of clean earth, air and water. 2. To teach and practice individual life- styles which enhance clean earth, air and water. 3.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

This is the part where both Rivers and Harbors Act § 10 and Clean Waters Act § 404 nationwide permits are now codified. … Regulations governing the Clean Water Act were codified at 33 C.F.R. Part 323.

Petition — California v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Except for the reference to service charges, § 313 is virtually identical to $118 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C, $1857f. … Similarly, the Clean Air Act and the Water Pollution Control Act amendments give effect to state law and require compliance with it by federal installations.

Amicus Brief — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975

Air Act. … First, opacity cannot be used as a standard under the Clean Air Act because it is unrelated to the amount of 8’ The Bureau of Standards of the U.S.

Respondents Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2009

American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc., 531 RE 31, 32, 33 Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg. ..............-... 32 ee ccc cdccececcccececceess 33 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 … In that case, the Court agreed with EPA that the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., unambiguously precludes consideration of costs in setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Upjohn Co. v. North Haven Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991

Air Act |42 U.S.C.A. § 7401 et seq.|, the Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C.A. § 1251 et seq.|, and other Federal and State laws respecting public _health and the environment, greater amounts … of administration 37a and enforcement and shall avoid duplication, to the maximum extent practicable; with the appropriate provisions of the Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.], the Federal

Transcript of Record — Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1963

refueling, turn-around inspection, fire guard aircraft cleaning, ¢te., and not eme ‘rgeney repairs or periodic checks or maffifenance, such as. are normally per- formed in “the shops of the ow ner of … Line serv iee shall be deemed to mean only routine Jine service, such as refueling, turn-around inspection, fire _ guard, aircraft cleaning, ete., and not emergency repairs or periodic checks or maintenance

Motion to Affirm — National Industrial Traffic League v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Affirm · 1969

Southern Railway Co., 372 U.S. 658 (1963) at Eastern Air Lines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 294 © ' F. 2d 235 (D.C. … suspension beyond the period fixed by the Commission.