Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.76s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Mama Jo’s, Inc., dba Berries, Petitioner v. Sparta Insurance Company
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2021
Cleaning and disinfecting are beside the point; the ubiquity of the virus means it is constantly re-introduced. … A “state is not without law save as its highest court has declared it”—“[t]here are many rules of decision commonly accepted and acted upon by the bar and inferior courts which are nevertheless laws of
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 29, 2025
The unfiltered 14 Id. 15 Id. at 14. 16 Id. 17 Id. at 5, 12 8 comments of this active-duty Army service member, captured by our survey, exemplify the level of disruption caused by mold-related contamination … We had to put all of our stuff into storage to be cleaned and we had to throw away or have professionally cleaned all of our linens.
Appendix — Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
to reduce the flow of convecied air under baking and self-cleaning conditions to within the range of 0.5 to 2 c.f.m. … ESSE: — act eet" aye aeeTes ™ “oe , ~ SH vee ‘ w z. ss » e: “a. aa, che SF ~~. .* = by > oe ad Fs *. - : a ns .» odes ~ — 2 on . 4 i 249.130) gtese & dun be tes 0. enate te an.
469 U.S. 835Appendix — United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974
The Clean Air Act authorizes the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare to initiate abatement procedures in interstate pollution situations and 805 silos empowers him to act when requested to … PART LI ~ CONTROL OF SUILPUR_OXTDE EMISSIONS Emphasis on sulfur oxides control technology research and development began with the Clean Air Act of 1963, continued with additional specific directions
415 U.S. 486Amicus Curiae Brief — English v. General Elec. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
. §2641); Clean Air Act (CAA), Pub. … Legislative history of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act cited in Conference Report of Clean Air Act, 1977 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News, 1077, 1404.
496 U.S. 72Reply Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 30, 2024
Given how integral state implementation plans are to the Clean Air Act, and to State sovereign prerogatives under the Act, this Court should ensure that does not occur. … At the core of the Clean Air 3 Act is a system of cooperative federalism in which States prepare and EPA approves or disapproves state plans implementing numerous provisions of the Act.
Respondents Brief — Growth Energy, Petitioner v. American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 25, 2021
This case is about Clean Air Act § 211(h)(4), a volatility allowance for certain fuel blends containing ethanol. 42 U.S.C. § 7545(h)(4). … The Clean Air Act limits the volatility of gasoline fuels, but a small 1pound-per-square-inch volatility allowance is available for all “fuel blends containing gasoline and 10 percent . . . ethanol.”
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arkansas Wildlife Federation v. ICI Americas, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
(ICI), and dismissing AWF’s action against ICI pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. § 1365. Arkansas Wildlife Fed’n v. ICI Americas Inc., 842 F. … By letter dated February 15, 1991, ADPC&E informed ICI that it was subject to enforcement action under the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, Ark.
513 U.S. 1147Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
This assumption 1s simply not true for wetlands, which at best fail on the margins of the Clean Water Act. See U.S. v. … The impacts ot placing fill can require ipproval and commitments to mitigate under the Coastal Zone Management Act, Clean Air Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Endangered Species Act, Migratory
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 3, 2021
Cir. 2021) ...................... 5-9 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. … As to where, it stated that both air pollution prevention and air pollution control should take place specifically “at its source”: The Congress finds— … (3) that air pollution prevention (that is, the
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2009
American Trucking Ass’ns, Inc., 531 EE a 31, 32, 33 Statutes and regulations: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg. ..............6065 32 ere Dass ssa aid be keneeeeeseess 33 Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C … In that case, the Court agreed with EPA that the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg., unambiguously precludes consideration of costs in setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2026
As pioneered by the Clean Air Act, citizen suit provisions brought a “new constituency to the regulatory bargaining table,” empowering states and private individuals “to litigate personal interests in … Private Citizens Are Uniquely Positioned to Enforce the Clean Water Act Given Their Proximity to and Lived Experiences with Violations of the Act.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Stoike v. First National Bank
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1943
Code, See. 201, ME ria ka ken dees cow vnaeee ss 1, 3, 4, 5, 13, 15, 16 NS asa shag ROR REM RRO OS aa eo SBR Spies ESP ras Feptpeeene a ir aire peer eie 12 Federal Employers Liability Act......... … In the period during which the Fair Labor Standards Act was in effect, plaintiff worked forty-eight hours per week for fifteen weeks (p. 18, fol. 54).
320 U.S. 762Brief for the Respondent — Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent · 1943
This court pointed out in ‘Be aboard Air Line v. … period.
317 U.S. 481Transcript of Record — Wood v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1922
Keniper acting Supervising Arehiteet of the U.S. … alter the expiration of the contract period.
258 U.S. 120Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 25, 2021
......................................................30 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412(a)(7) ................... 37, 38 Communications Act of 1934.............................. 7, 8, 34 47 U.S.C. § … “Health effects” and “environmental effects” are both used in the Clean Air Act, and they do not mean the same thing. When both are referred to, the act uses both terms.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Exxon Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
Whether the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency can lawfully promulgate control mea- sures in a substitute implementation plan under Section 110(c) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § … BLEED THROUGH —_* sa 3 ated by Respondent Environmental Protection Agency on November 6, 1973 pursuant to Sections 110(a)(2) and 110(c) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 84 Stat. 1680, 42 U.S.C.
427 U.S. 651Opposition — Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
The air does not mix with the smoke until both are in the smoker's mouth. … of tar was a deceptive practice under the FTC Act.
465 U.S. 1100Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kilkenny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1987
Uriarte Clean-up Service, Inc., 736 F.2d 516, 524-25 (9th Cir. 1984). … Surface air supplied by a Quincey 216 air compressor, which develops 12-13 cubic feet of air per minute.
480 U.S. 934Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986), we agreed with the Court of Appeals that in awarding attorney's fees under § 304(d) [of the Clean Air Act] the courts should follow … After reviewing the legislative history of the Clean Air Act, the Court concluded: The central purpose of § 304(d) [the Clean Air Act's fee- shifting provision] was to check the multiplicity of potentially
532 U.S. 994
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.