Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.21s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 17, 2018
August 24, 2017) .................. 9, 10, 11 Benisek v. Lamone, 266 F. Supp. 3d 799 (Md. August 24, 2017) ............................... 15 Brooks v. Kemp, 1:17-cv-3856-TCB (ND. Ga. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) (acknowledging that partisanship is a permissible factor to consider when redistricting).
Amicus Curiae Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968) ..... SEC v. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. of Am.., EE SS 5 ovcccssesccceces Securities Indus. Ass'n v. Federal Reserve Bd., 468 U.S. 207 (1984) ........ … Georgia Association of Independent Insurance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968), sixteen years before this court’s decision in Chevron. By contrast, the D.C.
511 U.S. 1141Reply Brief for the Petitioner — Exhibit Supply Co. v. Ace Patents Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief for the Petitioner · 1942
American Fur Ref. oy *-* ~~ 198 U.S, 399......: = Br cee ow atemtibe ables 26's 0% 6 Cuno Engineering Corp. Vv. Automatic Devices Corp., 62 Sup. Ct. 37, decided November 10, 1941. … ments of the ‘Home Run” game (Exs. 23 and 24) is dis- spelled in the light of the testimony (R. 159- 160): “XQ. 26. Mr.
315 U.S. 126Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Griffing v. Children's Home Society of Florida, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
.—, 107 S.Ct. 3034 (1987) . . . 24 Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) . 22, 23,25 Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545 (1965) ........ 21, 24 Chapman v. … Saba, 399 So.2d 456 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), review denied, 408 So.2d 1095 (1981) ........ 19 Skinner v. Oklahoma, 315 U.S. 535 (1942) .......... 24 Vv Stanley v.
495 U.S. 958Supplemental Brief — Natelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1977
Martin, Obermaier & Morvillo 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10019 Attorneys for Petitioner Wasrinqren OC © CLO PUBLIGHERD + LAW PRINETENG CO « (702) 399-0625 IN THE Supreme Court … UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI Pursuant to Rule 24(5) of the Rules of this Court, petitioner submits this supplemental brief to bring to
434 U.S. 819Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arizona ex rel. Dean v. City Court of Tucson
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
Dec. 1., 1972 § 24. Rights of accused in criminal prosecutions Section 24. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 69, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1888, 26 L.Ed.2d 437, 440 (1970) (footnote omitted).
493 U.S. 1080Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Weintraub v. California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
at 399-400. … Subsequently, bloodstained 24.
424 U.S. 914Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Donoho v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd ORE BE five. 14 United States v. Bottone, 365 PF. 2d 389, 394 (2nd Cir. . See Pe, Pe Te Pe: HRA NT aT 14 ‘United States v. … Barash, 365 F. 2d 395, 399, 403 (2nd Cir.’ 1966), states that ‘‘the doctrine of one good count is not a fetish’’: .
390 U.S. 1014Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — O'Bryan v. Chandler
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969
It is reported in 399 F.2d 916 and is set out as Appendix B to the Pe- tition. The Petition is incorrectly entitled in this Court O’Bryan v. Chandler, Chief Judge. … C. 20004 Counsel for Respondent of Counsel: SHIPLEY, ACKERMAN & PICKETT February 24, 1969
394 U.S. 906Card — Berry v. State Tax Commission
Supreme Court brief · Card · 1965
.: Sh. 179, 399 P.2d 164 (1965) 207. 2, 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20 Goodwin v. State Tax Commission,’ 286. App: Div. — 694, 146 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1955), 1. … Ed. 458 (1952) pecsnssecessezsenes hy 22, 13, 24, 16, 17 Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S..37, 40 S. Ct. 221, 64.L: Ed. 445° (1920) ........... ial edaiacwten eta 3, 18, 19, : State v.
382 U.S. 16Motion to Dismiss — Ludwig v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss · 1976
Ludwig, was charged in the District Court, District of Northern Norfolk, with viola- tion of G.L. e. 90, § 24(2)(a) (driving to endanger). … New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970), requires trial by jury in the first instance, is not substantial.
427 U.S. 618Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McClaren v. Wisconsin (No. 09-421)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). … Williams, 399 U.S. at 85 (emphasis added).
Opposition Brief — Ben M. Hogan Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987
Thompson agreed to Moore’s request and submitted a bid that was higher than petitioner’s (id. at 21, 24- 25). … The Eighth Circuit’s ruling in Voss relied heavily on the original panel decision in this case (787 F.2¢ at 398-399 & n.4), which was subsequently vacated by this Court.
484 U.S. 822Opposition Brief — Titan Group, Inc. v. Faggen
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
Vanderboom, 422 F.2d 221 ~“) (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 905 (1970) .... 7 Clement A, Evans & Co. vy. … Ross, 509 F.2d 980 (24 Cir. Ea Sa tna aR Re er Or near 8,9 Ply-Gem Industries, Inc. v. Green, CCH Fed. See. L. Rep. { 94,026 (S.D.N.Y.
423 U.S. 840Brief for the United States — United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1974
Bank, 399 U.S. 350, 372 (emphasis added). Appellees have not made that showing. … GX F-21, F-24, F-28 and F-29. They were cited (J.S., p. 19) to support the government’s contention that NBC had made known its interest in entering the Spo- kane market.
418 U.S. 602Respondents Brief — Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al., Petitioners v. Wyoming, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · May 18, 2018
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ............... 7, 12 Nebraska v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 1072 (2016).... 4, 12 Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. … NAT Pet. at 24.
Reply Brief — North Carolina, et al., Appellants v. Sandra Little Covington, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 15, 2018
Perry (“LULAC”), 548 U.S. 399, 416 (2006) (Kennedy, J.). … ECF 220 at 24, 29.
Opposition Brief — Johnson County Board of County Commissioners v. Southwestern Bell Wireless, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Ct. 399, SL. BE. SER CESS occ acne enero e eee 6,7 In the Matter of 960 Radio, Inc., FCC 85-578 (November 4, 19S) «ikea e sesso 9 National Broadcasting Co. v. … Ct. 399, 85 L. Ed. 581 (1941).
530 U.S. 1204Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Keepers, Inc., Petitioner v. City of Milford, Connecticut
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 5, 2019
Larosa, 796 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2015). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Central Radio Co., Inc. v. … Id. at 24. This Court subsequently denied certiorari review. See Keepers, Inc. v. City of Milford, Conn., 137 S.Ct. 277 (2016).
Reply Brief — Nancy Avina, Petitioner v. Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 5, 2023
Pet. 2-3, 19, 23-24, 25. … Pet. 23-24 (citing Tice v.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.