Documents

Reply Brief — Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC, et al., Applicants v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 18, 2024

S. 528 (1955), ........................................................................................... 2 STATUTES AND RULES Clean Air Act 42 U.S. … (cleaned up).

Volume XXVII — Dalehite v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Volume XXVII · 1952

Act.» … This office should de advised periotieally as to the eontrastors comments and the progress bein, radees BY CO.UAND UF Had Gud HAL BUULnSs COMCU RENCE: ORDLY-L-,P & E UNIT ACT eee eG eee es) = : ¥

Amicus Curiae Brief — Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd., Petitioner v. Brian Newton

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 27, 2019

VI, Cl. 2 (Supremacy Clause) ................................. 30 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ................................... 31 42 U.S.C. 7416 ........................................... … The Environmental Protection Agency administers the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tidewater Marine Service, Inc. v. Aubry

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991

SE ge es TD teceesiitinichaninionninsinenerss Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.: I he ities citccaccnatenscoutunstaroieaaianenion I Cet GO airs ctvcnecstieeimedooererumtcanes er ts Ie TD ncoccknseccerccscccsecesionetenesteus … Their crews, like those of Clean Seas, work alternating seven-day periods and 12-hour shifts. Pet. App. A6-A7. ec.

Appendix I — City of Santa Clarita, California v. Los Angeles County, California (No. 05-1462)

Supreme Court brief · Appendix I · 2006

The Proposed Decree Fails to Satisfy The First Factor Because It Violates the Federal Clean Air Act, Federal Land Policy and Management Act, and Federal Clean Water Act ..... Nir ees 41 F. … As this Court stated previously, “nothing in the Decree purports to affect any CEQA processes that may be ancillary to Federal Clean Air J-20 Act or Federal Clean Water Act permits that Cemex needs

Appendix — Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2001

“In passing the Airborne Hunting Act," the court said, "Congress acted with an express ‘purpose to regulate for the safety of the national air space. 18. … The top plane of the soil drys quickly because of exposure to the air.

Respondents Brief — Nat'l Ass'n of Mfrs. v. Dep't of Def., 137 S. Ct. 811 (2017) (No. 16-299)

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2017

A comparison of that provision to its counterpart in the Clean Air Act il- lustrates why. … And, unlike the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1), the Clean Water Act unambigu- ously divides jurisdiction between circuit courts and district courts.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986) ... x Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987) ..... passim Perotti v. … (“RCRA”) and the Clean Water Act, respec- tively.

Amicus Curiae Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 19, 2019

Reg. 64,892 (Dec. 12, 1991). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 EPA, Clean Water Act Rule Response to Comments – Topic 10: Legal Analysis,(2015), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production … See, e.g., EPA, Clean Water Act Rule Response to Comments – Topic 10: Legal Analysis, at 3 8 3 , 3 8 6 - 8 7 , 3 9 0 ( 2 0 1 5 ) , https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/doc uments/cwr_response_to_comments

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Former Eastern Pilots Granted Right to Substitute Counsel v. Continental Airlines, 216 B.R. 1049 (1998) (No. 97-1036)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

the Federal Aviation Act. … All other time periods or deadlines contained in the Settlement are also hereby extended by sixty (60) days.

Petitioners Brief — SD Warren Co. v. Maine Bd. of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2006

Coast Air Quality Mgmt. … Warren Company A-l APPENDIX: STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED Clean Water Act 33 U.S.C. § 1314.

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 CEIUPLT. dicddubuiesdicchicethcisireedtanasess arbaiebanbenkindane 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 Constitution, statutes, regulations and rule: ERR RR Be RG gene eon ne eae ee i) Clean Air Act … STATEMENT The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) admin- isters the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Prologue — Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.

Supreme Court brief · Prologue · 1955

at cane cleaning plant and cleaned empty cars after unloading and-cleaned up around unload- ing switch; he acted as watchman on equip- ment in cane cleaning plant to keep such equip- ment from being … You mean on the air compressors ? YM. Yes. A. When we took over the air compressors ? @. When did you, yourself, start performing the work of servicing or repairing the air com- pressors ?

Reply Brief — Robert D. Vocke, Jr., Petitioner v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 22, 2017

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 744 F.3d 741 (D.C. … Yes, obviously this isn’t a Clean Air Act case.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1968

A a Section 109. { 3 R 2 24 Clean Air ‘Act adop ted December 17, 1963, ‘Public Law 88-206, 88th Cong. H. … As stated by this Court in the Huron case, supra, at page 445: 4 Clean Air Act of 1963; Public Law 88.206; Air Quality Act of pene 90-148, disc ‘de ‘11282 dated 25, 196 relating to restrictions governmental

Respondents Brief — Arkansas v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1992

Clean Air Act. … The legal memo- randum drew a distinction between the Clean Air Act, which prohibited only “significant” deterioration, and the Clean Water Act, where no degradation meant no new point source discharges

Appendices — Fernandes v. Rockaway Township Town Council

Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 1996

EPA provided sewer grant funding to RVRSA under Title II of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1281-1299. 2. … The addendum will allow for a 30 calendar day comment period.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marek v. Chesny

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

Ct. 3274 (1983) .... 31 Clayton Antitrust Act, 15 SS. Ge § 72 eeee<eee74us8ee#e#ee#es 17 j , 435 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. … These statutes include, inter alia: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k); the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(f£); the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C.(Supp.

Jurisdictional Statement — Inland Empire Builders, Inc. v. Washington

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1964

The United States, acting through the Department of the Air Force, de- termined that it required military housing at MeChord Air Force Base and plans and specitications for the construction of such … There, under the authority of the Capehart Act, the government entered inte a eontract virtually identical with that of the instant case for the construction of military housing at the Eglin Air Force

Brief for the Petitioner — Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1944

This clean- ing period required another 12 hours (ibid.). … ‘No comment on this opinion is necessary in view Of its obviong logic.