Documents

Joint Appendix vol II — NTA Graphics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix vol II · 1994

; | / 255 Empty oil pans periodically as needed. Periodically check all bolts for looseness. … No comment was, though, necessary because the two cases consider different printing operations.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — City of New Haven v. Marsh

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988

ACOE” or “Corps"), under section 404 of the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C. § 1344, section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act ("RHA"), 33 U.S.C. § 403 and section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental … Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344, provides in perti- nent part: (a) , 3 al he Discharge _into navigable Sites.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Environmental Protection Agency, Petitioner v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2024

Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program. … Air Act.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Osage Nation v. Irby

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011

During this period, 118 Indian reservations had been allotted, 44 of which had been opened to homestead entry by non-Indians under the public land laws. AM. INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMM’! … ronmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), under its program of treating Indian tribes as “states” for pur- pose of administering air quality standards developed pursuant to Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C

Amicus Curiae Brief — HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Renewable Fuels Association, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 31, 2021

(quotations cleaned)). … Dockey=P100YAPQ.pdf. 10 See also Petition for Waiver Under Clean Air Act Section 211(o)(7)(A)(i) of the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) at 4 (Mar. 30, 2020), https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files

Amicus Curiae Brief — Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. Mexichem Fluor, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2018

The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act............................................... 17 A. … The Court Below Disregarded the Plain Text of the Clean Air Act.

Reply Brief — Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al., Petitioners v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Aug 26, 2026

The Clean Air Act obviously did not modify those principles. … That inference would be easy to draw here, given the otherwise comprehensive scope of the Clean Air Act.

Opposition Brief — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. … See 2 Congres- sional Research Service, A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, for the Senate Comm. on Public Works, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 829 (Comm.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 14, 2022

Air Act might displace any such claim); see also County of San Mateo v. … Accordingly, there is no state law for the Clean Air Act (or any other federal statute) to resurrect: state law did not govern interstate emissions before Congress acted, and the application of state law

Opposition Brief — Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Sims

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989

the Florida statute was preempted by the Clean Air Act and the Federal Highway Safety - 12 « Act. … , 15 U.S.C. §1381, et seq. and the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C

Amicus Brief — American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. Donovan

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1981

Aug. 15, 1980) ....6, 7, 8, 10,1 Statutes anp Rutss: Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seg... 4 Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq. 4 Occupational Safety and Health … At the same time the industry is subjected to these heavy expenses of compliance with OSHA regulations, it is subject to the burdensome costs of complying with the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et

Reply Brief — R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., Petitioners v. County of Los Angeles, California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 7, 2023

Both the Clean Air Act (Engine Manufacturers) and the TCA preempt “standards.” And both statutes require looking to the plain meaning of the word “standard.” 541 U.S. at 253. … The Clean Air Act’s preemption clause had “categorical” sweep. Id. at 256.

Appendix — Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975

It comments on drugs. Those are both important issues right now. It comments on profanity. It comments on the Vietnam War especially. … What about the ecology comments [247] in the play, what did you derive from them? A Well, there is a lot of facts in the ecology scene, pure air and things like that.

Reply Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999

Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 467-7145 Counsel for Clean Air Implementation Project DAVID E. MENOTTI WILLIAM F.. PEDERSEN SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE 2300 N Street, N.W. … By contrast, statutes like the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “Act”) that mandate pre-enforcement judicial review of specified agency actions have never been interpreted by this Court to allow lower courts

Appendix — United States v. General Dynamics Corp.

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1974

The Theme Is: The Gas Self-Cleaning Oven For People Who Like To Cook. Period.” … Earlier, Ogilvie had commented on-air pollution in Chicago.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Shell Oil Co. v. United States (Nos. 07-1607, 07-1601)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009

‘CERCLA borrows its definition of “disposal” and “treatment” from “section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act” (“SWDA”) (codified, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 … Some commentators estimate that the average cost to clean up a hazardous waste site ranges “be- tween $25 million and $50 million.” Michael L.

Petitioners Brief — United States Gypsum Co. v. Stornelli

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1943

gas’ would disregard the plain purpose of the Act; and in- deed, even if we were disposed to be literal, air is a gas, and air filled with finely comminuted particles of rock be ed aamaadadil EA APSA … Sub. 6 of §49 of the New York Practice Act makes three years the period of limitation for “an action to recover dam- ages for * * * a personal in jury, resulting from negligence” ; and sub. 2 of §48

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hammons Products Co. v. Agrashell, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973

Clayton Act Sec. 4. … black walnut shells,’ and a product, ‘an abrasive material for use in air blasts for cleaning metal comprising pelletized black walnut shells.’ ’?

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Whether the Environmental Protection Agency, in promulgating a final rule respecting implementation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., reasonably … STATEMENT Petitioners seek review of a decision of the court of appeals arising from an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemaking under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg.

Opposition Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Whether the Environmental Protection Agency, in promulgating a final rule respecting implementation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., reasonably … STATEMENT Petitioners seek review of a decision of the court of appeals arising from an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rulemaking under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seg.