Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.28s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, SBREFA Panel Support for Cooling Water Phase III Regulations Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act: Final ST Ss TED occ cbecccctccscesees> 24 … Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, SBREFA Panel Support for Cooling Water Phase II] Regulations Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act: Final Report (Jan. 9, 2004) (EPA-HQ-OW 2004
556 U.S. 208Appendix — Mountainside Butter & Egg Co. v. United States Department of Agriculture
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1984
- (d) Breakers shall use a complete set of clean equipment when starting work and after lunch periods. All table equipment shall be rotated with clean equip ment every 22 hours. … When not in use, belts shall be raised to permit air drying.
465 U.S. 1066Amicus Curiae Brief — City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
It is ample to lay out zones where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people. Belle Terre, 416 US. at 9. … What group of individuals more need to live in a zone “where family values, youth values, and the blessings of quiet seclusion and clean air make the area a sanctuary for people” than those handicapped
514 U.S. 725Appendix — Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1968
The cleaning of the . boilers involves the periodic removal of the incrustations. … Dow claims, however, that CCI had committed other contemptuous acts during the two-year period which the court should have considered; but did not, in its award of damages.
389 U.S. 1040Respondents Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 18, 2022
No. 95-95, 91 Stat. 685 .................................................. 22 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. … See Clean Air Amendments Act of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-95, § 109(c)(1)(A), 91 Stat. 685, 700; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101549, § 403(a), 104 Stat. 2399, 2631.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 8, 2022
Air Act. … Accordingly, there is no state law for the Clean Air Act (or any other federal statute) to resurrect: state law did not govern interstate emissions before Congress acted, and the application of state law
Opposition Brief — Burks v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
That test was run in the course of a consent search of the car during the period of appellant's interrogation. … BURKS, JR., FR438-84-1604 UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Sentence adjudged 16 April 1990 by GCM convened at George Air Force Base, California. Military Judge: Michael B. McShane.
510 U.S. 866Petition — M. G. R. S., Inc. v. California State Board of Equalization
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Island Air Lines, Inc., 235 F.Supp. 990 (D. … During the audit period, the operations of the S.S.
449 U.S. 874Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
The Clean Air Act includes mechanisms, apart from the hardship exemption, that are designed to ease the burdens of the Renewable Fuel Standard. … The Clean Air Act also grants individual refineries an extra one-year period to correct non-compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Air Act. … Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 22, 2017
OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS of 1970 (1970). ........................................................ 3 H.R. REP. … Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Air Act.” … Throughout the remainder of this brief, we use the abbreviations “GHG” to refer to greenhouse gases and “CAA” to refer to the Clean Air Act. 4 EPA rested its decision not to regulate GHGs on a num-
549 U.S. 497Opposition Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2004
Whether those same rules require a conformity analysis with state plans under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7506. … Clean Air Act 40 C.F.R. §93.152 provides in part: When an agency, in performing its normal program responsibilities, takes actions itself or imposes con- ditions that result in air pollutant emissions
541 U.S. 752Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 12, 2023
Both the Clean Air Act (Engine Manufacturers) and the TCA preempt “standards.” Compare 21 U.S.C. § 387p(a)(2)(A), with 541 U.S. at 252. … California nevertheless asserts that the Clean Air Act’s preemption clause was absolute, whereas the TCA’s preserves some state and local authority. BIO 13–14. This supposed distinction is illusory.
Stipulation — United States v. Alaska
Supreme Court brief · Stipulation · 1992
(X) Discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States Section 404, Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344). … PUBLIC HEARING: Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application.
503 U.S. 569Opposition — Save The Bay, Inc. v. United States Corps of Engineers
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Since the case of Citi- zen’s for Clean Air, Inc. v. U.S. Corps of Engineers et al., 349 F.Supp. 696 (S.D. … Hawaiian Electric Com- pany, Inc., supra, and Citizens for Clean Air, Inc. et al. v.
449 U.S. 900Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023
In those cases, the Court deferred to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpretations of the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act that weakened regulatory burdens on industry. … interpretation of a “complex statute” like the Clean Air Act is the “correct” one, id. at 87.
Amicus Brief — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Conse- 2 Section 111(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 1857e- 6(a)(1)) provides: ‘‘The term ‘standard of performance’ means a standard for emissions of air pollutants which reflects the degree … Also the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that the Clean Air Act be read in such a way as to include a con- sideration of economic factors.
423 U.S. 1025Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
Nowhere in the Clean Air Act does Congress Delegate the Greatly Enlarged Powers Claimed by EPA in the Clean Power Plan ............................... 17 Conclusion .................................... … Nowhere in the Clean Air Act does Congress Delegate the Greatly Enlarged Powers Claimed by EPA in the Clean Power Plan.
Opposition — Harrison v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
EPA, 595 F.2d 207 my = en FS ee a se awee weada 3,4 li TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Continued) Page Statutes: Clean Air Act, as amended by Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … Harrison’ creates serious prob- lems in administering the Clean Air Act.
446 U.S. 578
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.