Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.98s
Opposition Brief — Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Michael E. Mann
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jun 28, 2019
Facts: Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration of the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions … In February 2010, CEI, along with other entities, petitioned the EPA to reconsider its Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
Stat. § 403.703(35) (2021) (defining solid waste as sludge unregulated under the federal Clean Water Act or Clean Air Act); Fla. … Clean Water Act); Fla.
Reply Brief — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act clearly recognizes the difference be- tween new sources and existing sources and treats new sources in a more restrictive manner. … The separate treatment of these existing sources is expressly limited by the Clean Air Act to meeting and maintaining the ambient standards.
425 U.S. 934Response — National Rifle Assn. v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Response · 2003
The congressional review period has now passed, however, and the regulations remain in effect. And the FEC could not, of course, change its mind without notice- and-comment rulemaking. … Air, MUR 4982, at 910 (FEC Apr. 23, 2002); 148 Cong.
539 U.S. 939Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 20, 2024
Air Act (“CAA”). … HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Congress carefully crafted the Renewable Fuel Standard (“RFS”) program of the Clean Air Act to nudge the nation toward clean renewable fuel sources1 and Congress
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CLEAN v. City of Spokane
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
(5) Has the City violated the Clean Air Act? … Air Act.
525 U.S. 812Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air. . . .” Clean Air Act § 302(g), 42 U.S.C. § 7602(g). … Clean Air Act § 302(h), 42 U.S.C. § 7602(h) (emphasis added). Thus, a substance emitted into the air that endangers climate is subject to regulation under section 202.
549 U.S. 497Amicus Brief — Portland Cement Ass'n v. Train
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1975
Conse- 2 Section 111(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 1857e- 6(a)(1)) provides: ‘‘The term ‘standard of performance’ means a standard for emissions of air pollutants which reflects the degree … Also the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that the Clean Air Act be read in such a way as to include a con- sideration of economic factors.
423 U.S. 1025Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wyoming v. Kleppe
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
The courts thus far have added only one other exemp- tion and that is in the “Clean Air Act” cases, some of which are cited above. The Regicnal Administrator of the EPA (App. … Control Act and the Clean Air Act, and detailed procedures are established in those Acts which the EPA must follow and which assure that affected parties will be heard prior to agency action.
426 U.S. 906Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. McWane, Inc. (Nos. 08-223, 08-364)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air. … In that case, this Court held that enhancements to the lodestar for attorneys’ fees under the Clean Air Act, for assuming the risk of nonpayment, were improper. 483 U.S. 711 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Heinrich v. United States (No. 06-1271)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
The inability of the circuit courts to agree on the controlling opinion in Rapanos and the lack of any valid federal Clean Water Act regulations, has made enforcement of the Clean Water Act contradictory … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 483 U.S. 711 (1987), to determine the controlling opinion.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
No. 91- A eR rer er rrr: Po es 4 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. … The court of appeals held that the ERP violates the Clean Air Act, and it vacated the rule. Pet. App. la- 17a. .
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
LYa The enforcement provisions of the CWA were mod- eled after the enforcement provisions of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. Southern Pines, 912 F.2d at 716 (citing S.Rep. … Appeals to review final administrative action under the Clean Air Act.
513 U.S. 927Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 22, 2023
In those cases, the Court deferred to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpretations of the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act that weakened regulatory burdens on industry. … interpretation of a “complex statute” like the Clean Air Act is the “correct” one, id. at 87.
Emergency Application — Alaska, et al., Applicants v. Department of Education, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jul 5, 2024
During the comment period, commenters urged the Department to conduct an alternate cost estimate to account for the possibility that courts may vacate the Administration’s HEROES Act Plan. … The 30-day Comment Period Violated the APA. The States are also likely to prevail on their claim that the Department’s 3026 day notice period violated the APA.
Petition — Talman Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Carroll
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 430 F. Supp. 884 (E. D. … Plaintiff also cites a series of cases where discrimination on the basis of sex was found violative of the Act. In Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc., 444 F. 2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1971), cert.
445 U.S. 929Transcript of Record — United States v. Continental Can Co.
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1964
If the air pressure at this point does not exceed the steam pressure, no air will pass into the retort during the come-up period; thus, “chatter” will not be controlled. … Vents are large valve-controlled * openings into retorts used for elimination of air during the come-up period.
378 U.S. 441Amicus Curiae Brief — Michigan v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 702 (2014) (No. 14-46)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
We also work to ensure that courts re- main faithful to the text, structure, and purpose of key federal statutes like the Clean Air Act and, in turn, protect: the authority of the elected branches to … plants, referred to in the Clean Air Act ‘Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.6, amicus curiae states that no counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no party or counsel for
Opposition Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2009
American Trucking Ass’ns, 531 U.S. 457 (2001), where cost considerations were precluded by the “most natural of readings” of the Clean Air Act provision at issue there. Id. at 465. … Other statutes expressly authorizing cost-benefit analysis include the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300g- 1(bX3XCXiMIV), the fuel additive provision of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7545(cX2
556 U.S. 208Reply Brief — Joseph David Robertson, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Mar 22, 2019
Act, Washington Post (Dec. 17, 2003), https://www. washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/12/17/ epa-scraps-changes-to-clean-water-act/a743b32 b8cfc-4b54-8ccaa2ba1e27378c/? … Eric Pianin, EPA Scraps Changes to Clean Water Act, Washington Post (Dec. 17, 2003). 1 Even assuming the agencies adopt the new proposal, it will not resolve the uncertainties about the Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.