Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Janice Hughes Barnes, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Ashtian Barnes, Deceased, Petitioner v. Roberto Felix, Jr., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 24, 2024

L. 391, 399 (2008). … Lacks, supra, at 399-401. This narrow interpretation meant that Section 1983 was 6 rarely invoked against police officers. Id. at 399-401.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, 137 S. Ct. 326 (2016) (No. 16-348)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

App’x 31 (5th Cir. 2007) ...............00..0.00...9 In re Chaussee, 399 B.R. 225 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)......... 24, 25, 26 Cope v. Anderson, ETE Rn arc me LITE 13 Crawford v. … In re Chaussee, 399 B.R. at 238.

Record and brief — Coy v. Iowa

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1988

Inadi, at 399. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) . . _ 5, 7, 9, 24 Chappel v. State, 18 Ark. App. 26, 710 SW.2d 214 SS a ere eee wee Commonwealth v. Ludwig, No. E1003, slip op. (Pa.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Gholston v. Martin

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1982

Kansas City General Hospital, 608 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Mo. 1980); Roberts v. Durham County Hospital, N.C. App. 9 » 389 S.E.2d 875, 878-79 (rejecting strict scrutiny). … Tripi, supra, at 170-72, 267 N.E.2d at 423-24. The court thus properly deferred to the legislative judgment in this pragmatic, policy-laden area.

Petitioners Brief — Cupp v. Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 49 (1970); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 158-159 -_ 15 wt (1925). … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51-52 (1970).

Reply Brief — Romag Fasteners, Inc., Petitioner v. Fossil Group, Inc., fka Fossil, Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jun 4, 2019

Renosky, 399 F.3d 168 (3d Cir. 2005) ........................................ 3 Church & Dwight Co. v. Russ, 99 F. 276 (C.C.D. … Br. in Opp. 24-25.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Billy Raymond Counterman, Petitioner v. Colorado

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 12, 2022

E.g., R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (internal quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. … R.A.V., 505 U.S. at 399 (quoting Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 571–72 (1942)); see also Riley v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ashley Moore, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 8, 2026

Moore, No. 7:24-cr-218-2 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2025) No other proceedings in state or federal trial or appellate courts, or in this Court, are directly related to this case. … Illinois directly condemns the approach taken below. 399 U.S. 235 (1970).

Respondents Brief — Tull v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1987

The remedy created by the Clean Water Act is equitable 24 C. … Kansas, 123 U.S 23 11, 20, — 23, 24, 37 O’Connor v. Cook, 6 Ves. ton 665, aff’d, 8 Ves. Jun. 536 " ST FT eR ene 23 Parklane Hosiery Co." V. Shove. 439 U.S. 399 15 16. 10, 42 Parsons V.

Petitioners Brief — Watts v. Tennessee

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1972

Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970), recognized the safeguards of having the declarant at trial. … Green, 399 U.S. at 176 (Harlan, J., concurring).

Opposition — Penoli v. California

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).

Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973

Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).

Petitioners Brief — United States v. Mitchell

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980

Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399, quoting United States v. … Testan, supra, 424 U.S. at 399-400.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1966

Ce. . 1952), certified question dismissed, 344 U.S. 4 (1952)“.... 24 CAB v.-Delta Air Lines, 367 US. 316 (196K) | oi. 6s 12, 17, 24, 25 Capitot Airways v. CAB, 292 ¥'.2d 755 (D.C. … Another provision of Part 399, § 399.33 _ (a), sets forth the ecmdatiindi, ‘ander which the Board allows off- , pak reduced fares.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Gibbons

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1981

See Jurisdictional Statement at 23-24. … "In his dissent, Justice Black complained of the majority's departure from Ecker. 399 U.S. at 499.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · Nov 20, 2017

Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006).1 Racially polarized voting is significant in Nueces County but insignificant in Travis County. … “[W]illfully ignor[ing] those who pointed out deficiencies,” id. 45a n.46, including its own attorney, the legislature ratified Plan C235 on June 24, 2013. I.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956

A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.

Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020

See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.

Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025

Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.