Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.31s
Reply Brief — Valero Energy Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 20, 2020
Statutory volume goals increase annually, domestic and imported supply-and-demand change annually, and new fuel pathways are periodically approved. … Ams. for Clean Energy v. EPA, 864 F.3d 691, 703 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Emergency Application — Alaska, et al., Applicants v. Department of Education, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jul 5, 2024
During the comment period, commenters urged the Department to conduct an alternate cost estimate to account for the possibility that courts may vacate the Administration’s HEROES Act Plan. … The 30-day Comment Period Violated the APA. The States are also likely to prevail on their claim that the Department’s 3026 day notice period violated the APA.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
In accordance with CAA §110 and the California Clean Air Act, Cal. … Congress required that the impacts of the FMCSA’s regulations be fully analyzed pur- suant to the Clean Air Act The Clean Air Act creates a partnership between federal, state, and local governments
541 U.S. 752Reply Brief — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1976
The Clean Air Act clearly recognizes the difference be- tween new sources and existing sources and treats new sources in a more restrictive manner. … The separate treatment of these existing sources is expressly limited by the Clean Air Act to meeting and maintaining the ambient standards.
425 U.S. 934Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2008
Ct. at 381 (citing Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7604; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 6972 (1982 ed. and Supp. … This Court has not addressed the parameters of diligent prosecution under the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or the Toxic Substances Control Act.
Opposition Brief — Newell Recycling Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001
VIII Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A) sess....... Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b) Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(d) Solid Waste Disposal Act, Tit. … See, e.g., Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319(d); Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6928(g), 6991e; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413(b).
534 U.S. 813Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 16, 2023
Air Act. … Air Act.
Response — National Rifle Assn. v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Response · 2003
The congressional review period has now passed, however, and the regulations remain in effect. And the FEC could not, of course, change its mind without notice- and-comment rulemaking. … Air, MUR 4982, at 910 (FEC Apr. 23, 2002); 148 Cong.
539 U.S. 939Respondents Brief — United States v. Locke
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1999
The Water Quality Improvement Act and Clean Water Act Amendments. The Exxon Vadez oil spill. .......... … See also Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7407(a)(3) (“the prevention and control of air pollution at its source is the primary responsibility of states and local governments”) (emphasis added).
527 U.S. 1063Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Wyoming v. Kleppe
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1976
The courts thus far have added only one other exemp- tion and that is in the “Clean Air Act” cases, some of which are cited above. The Regicnal Administrator of the EPA (App. … Control Act and the Clean Air Act, and detailed procedures are established in those Acts which the EPA must follow and which assure that affected parties will be heard prior to agency action.
426 U.S. 906Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 20, 2023
Circuit] reasoned that ‘the purposes of the [Clean Air Act’s] nonattainment program should guide our decision here [to strike down the regulation].’”) (quoting Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. … pollutants, to a Clean Air Act program for States that had not yet attained federal air quality standards.
Supplemental Brief — Vista Paint Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993
The Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.,’ requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for air pollutants … Reg. 2 All references to the Clean Air Act will be to the Act as it currently stands unless otherwise indicated.
510 U.S. 826Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 5, 2021
See 20-1530 Pet. 13–15, 25–34 (attacking CPP Rule’s interpretation of Clean Air Act and D.C. … Air Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air. . . .” Clean Air Act § 302(g), 42 U.S.C. § 7602(g). … Clean Air Act § 302(h), 42 U.S.C. § 7602(h) (emphasis added). Thus, a substance emitted into the air that endangers climate is subject to regulation under section 202.
549 U.S. 497Petition for Writ of Certiorari — CLEAN v. City of Spokane
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
(5) Has the City violated the Clean Air Act? … Air Act.
525 U.S. 812Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Atlantic Richfield Company, Petitioner v. Asarco LLC
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 11, 2021
(“RCRA”) and the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). … (“SDWA”) the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), National Ambient Air Quality Standards, federally approved state water quality standards). (2) If ASARCO chooses to conduct a risk assessment, the results of that
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 18, 2022
Stat. § 403.703(35) (2021) (defining solid waste as sludge unregulated under the federal Clean Water Act or Clean Air Act); Fla. … Clean Water Act); Fla.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 9, 2018
Air Act’s federal air quality standards. … quality standards under the Clean Air Act.
Jurisdictional Statement — National Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 2003
STUDY AND REPORT ON CLEAN MONEY CLEAN ELECTIONS LAWS. … Finally, with respect to Sections 318 and 504, which *Some commenters on the proposed FEC regulations argued that "the period between a final decision in [this] litigation and the 2004 elections is
539 U.S. 975Opposition Brief — Competitive Enterprise Institute, et al., Petitioners v. Michael E. Mann
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jun 28, 2019
Facts: Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration of the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions … In February 2010, CEI, along with other entities, petitioned the EPA to reconsider its Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.