Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.48s
Opposition Brief — Brigandi v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30 (1969) 0.00. 16 Zap v. … Harris, 453 F. 24 1317 (8th Cir. 1972).
414 U.S. 1040Opposition — Penoli v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42; Cardwell v. Lewis (1975) 417 U.S. 583, 589.) … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). See also South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 3604, 367 (1976).
440 U.S. 945Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pordum v. Board of Regents of New York
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) .. 7,8 Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) ...... 7 Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) ........ 6, 7 Brown v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 (1958) (discharge of a teacher for ‘‘incompetency’’); Indiana ex rel. Anderson v.
419 U.S. 843Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1956
A petition for review was filed by petitioner in the court below on June 24, 1955 (R. 2-11). … Meth 3 Craneh 399, 413; see also Padlerton-Krucger Lumber Co. Vv. Northern) Pacific Railway Co, 266 U.S. 485: Scehirab vy.
352 U.S. 846Reply Brief — United States, Petitioner v. California, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Jan 2, 2020
See Pet. 24-28. … California suggests (Br. in Opp. 24) that the Second Circuit’s decision in that case does not survive Murphy.
Reply Brief — Arthur Seale, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 23, 2025
Nos. 24-594 & 23-7806 IN THE ARTHUR SEALE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. … Dkt.” refer to docket No. 24-594, containing Dr. Seale’s petition from the amended judgment in his criminal case. Citations to “Civ.
Reply Brief — Ronell Moses, Jr., Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 23, 2025
No. 25-399 In the Supreme Court of the United States RONELL MOSES, JR., PETITIONER v. … Br. at 24 n.8, Jardines, supra (No. 11-564). But the Court flatly rejected that contention.
Respondents Brief — Gerard A. Sheridan, Petitioner v. Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 28, 2018
Dist. of Cal., 806 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1986) .............................. 24 Brat v. Personhuballah, 883 F.3d 475 (4th Cir. 2018) …………………. 26, 27 Charles v. … Carland, 217 U.S. 268 (1910) .............................................. 24 McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (2017) .......................................... 24 Melendres v. Arpaio, 989 F.
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Rakes v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1963
Board of Education, 357 US _ 399 . 238 Borrow, Morton, 27 F.C.C. 783. __... : pete nd 7,9,13 ‘Borrow v. … Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399, 405; Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 493; and Garner v.
373 U.S. 939Opposition Brief — Kemp v. Osage Nation (No. 07-1484)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
District Court, 420 U.S. 425 (1975) ...5, 24 Dubuc v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994)............cccececeees 5, 24 Hill v. Kemp, 478 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2007)...i4, 15,.17 Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael White, Petitioner v. Donald Knapp, Jr., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2021
Kroth vDobson, 324 Mich 384 at 399 (1949) citing Ray v Foutcb (Tex.Civ.App.), 50 S.W.2d 380, 381. QUESTIONS: 1. … “The owner of the land... may effect a constructive severance... preventing it from passing to the purchaser, ”Kroth v Dobson, 324 Mich 384 at 399 (1949).
Supplemental Brief for the United States — Franklin Life Insurance v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief for the United States · 1969
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT Docket No. 1621-64 Filed February 24, 1969. … United States, 399 F. 2d 757, certiorari applied for Nov. 27, 1968, promul- gated subsequent to the original opinion of this Court, we deemed it appropriate to reconsider the two issues mentioned above
393 U.S. 1118Opposition — Marzano v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
United States, 399 F. 2d 557, certiorari denied, 393 U.S. 1057 .0...........ccccceeceeees 7 Bayless v. … Tr. 24-25).
429 U.S. 1038Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Peele v. Jones
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
ALABAMA, 399 U. S. 1 (1970); PHILLIPS v. NORTH CAROLINA, 433 F. 2d 659 (4th Cir. 1970) ; STATE v. GASQUE, supra. … Ed. 2d 24 (1968) , only discrim- inations which are “invidious” do. MOREY v. DOWD, 354 US. 457, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1485 (1957).
417 U.S. 930Opposition Brief — Aleman v. Sugarman
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1973
George, 399 U.S. 224 Oliver v. State of California, 364 F. 2d 311 Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270 Scarpetta v. Spence-Chapin Adoption, 28 N Y 2d 185 Stanley v. … Mother has been on 24 hour suicide watch since May 18, 1971.
410 U.S. 983Supplemental Brief — McKeown v. Delaware Bridge Authority
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2002
"Using Microsimulation to Quantify the Impact of Electronic Toll Collection” /TE Journal Vol. 66 (July 1996): 21-24. Friedman, David and Waldfogel, Joel. … Appendix A-15 00 LSt 0s'9 1z7z .2Besaay payyGiayy 399} 3..
535 U.S. 1079Supplemental Brief — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Petitioner v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · Apr 11, 2023
iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED.......................................... i RULES 24(B) AND 29.6 STATEMENT .................... ii I. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ................................................ 9 Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Kaiser v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1973
Jacangelo, 281 F. 24 574 (3rd Cir. 1960). 20 14, 17, 19, 24 22 22 oS, 20, 13, 24, and 17 14, 15 ll 22 15, 23, 24 22 21 INDE X Cases (Continued) United States v. … Rule 52(a) and (b), 18 U.S.C.A., p. 399, Federal Rules of Crimi- nal Procedure. Section 3481, Title 18, U.S.C.A., p. 488. U.S.C.A. Constitutional Amend- ment Five, p. 4.
414 U.S. 855Petition — Gust v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
GUST 399 Parma Center Road Hilton, New York 14468 Telephone: (715) 722-1665 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the petitioner received a fair trial and was con- victed with truthful evidence. 2. … On July 24, 1980, after a three-day trial, the jury found petitioner guilty of three counts of willful failure to file individual tax returns for the calendar years 1975, 1976 and 1977 in violation
451 U.S. 988Opposition — Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Colonial Ford, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Pease having to pay anything. (179-89, 393-97, 399-400, 402-04: PX-4, PX-49.)' Colonial’s evidence was that Mr. … Bel- nap in these transactions (178-89, 393-96, 399-400, 402- 04; PX-4.), and was corroborated by Mr.
444 U.S. 837
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.