Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.17s
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jun 30, 2025
Section 401(a) of the Clean Water Act provides that if a State “fails or refuses to act on a request” for a water-quality certification “within a reasonable period of time (which shall not exceed one year … A provision of the NGA known as the “savings clause” preserves “the rights of States under” the CWA (as well as the Coastal Zone Management Act and the Clean Air Act). 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d).
Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Plan for Arcadia, Inc. v. Anita Associates
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974
Air Act of 1970, Sec. 110 ....................... 4 Clean Air Act of 1970, Sec. 110(c) -.20000000 eee. 4 Clean Air Act of 1970, Sec. 3064 ..................... , Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination … Clean Air Act § 110(c); 42 U.S.C. § 1857c-5(c).
419 U.S. 1034Opposition Brief — Trident Seafoods Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1997
Air Act. … Air Act.
519 U.S. 1109Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carruthers v. Duran
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Be On Le eee wt 5, 8-9, 10 Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air v. … Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 106 S. Ct. 3088 (1986), and Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 107 S. Ct. 8078 (1987).
486 U.S. 1046Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lubart v. Collins
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1991
In the Clean Air Act case of Pennsylvania Vv. … Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, - 106 S.Ct. 3088, 3097 (1986) In the Civil Rights case of Blanchard v. Bergeron, 109 S.Ct. 939 (1989) Justice White wrote: "Hensley v.
500 U.S. 942Petitioners Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Dec 13, 2024
The Clean Air Act centers on the “‘core principle’ of cooperative federalism.” EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 572 U.S. 489, 511 n.14 (2014). … The Clean Air Act’s venue provision reinforces this balance between national standards and local implementation.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Firestone Plastics Co. v. United States Department of Labor
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Elian Ss cas acbeeuks cacbeeeeenee 9,11 Clean Air Act Amen:iments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857f-1 (b) (1), et seq. … Department of Transportation, 472 F.2d 659 8 Senator Muskie, the Senate sponsor of the Clean Air Act Amendments, made comments in support of the final language of that Act which are diametrically opposed
420 U.S. 1002Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
The States submit their SIPs to EPA to meet their obligation under the Clean Air Act to control air pollution within their borders. … Thus, Congress placed the ultimate responsibility for enforcement of the Clean Air Act on EPA.
490 U.S. 1039Appendix — City of Portland v. Northwest Environmental Advocates
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1996
PROF App-31 Clean Air Act (“CAA”) provision that applies to air pollution permit conditions.? Id. at 3745. … Air Act (“CAA”) provision that applies to air pollution permit conditions
518 U.S. 1018Amicus Curiae Brief — Air Pollution Variance Bd. of Colo. v. Western Alfalfa Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Fed- eral Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 1857c-9(a)(2)(A). The Clean Air Amendments of 1970 do not require a warrant prior to such entry. … The Federal Clean Air Act, which has entry provisions al- most identical to those of Colorado in the present case (42 U.S.C. § 1857c-9), recognizes that the control of air pollution, though a matter
416 U.S. 861Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Marine Shale Processors, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
As with the Clean Water Act violations discussed above, EPA believes the violations by MSP of the Clean Air Act 124a are egregious, repeated and intentional. … Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and RCRA.
519 U.S. 1055Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brown v. Penn Central Transportation Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
His comment was Moderate Irreversible Obstruction Airway Trapping. … Normal resting and exercise blood gases (see comments). COMMENTS: Mr. Brown complained of dizziness at one minute. The blood pressure was normal and the heart rate was 65.
510 U.S. 1165Petition — Indiana-Kentucky Elect. Corp. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Whether State implementation plans which meet the eight criteria of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) are also re- quired by the Clean Air Act to prohibit significant deterioration of air quality. z … Air Act.
430 U.S. 953Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2024
. § 240.14a-9(a) ........................................... 19 Clean Air Act, 74 Fed. … Air Act, 74 Fed.
Opposition Brief — Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
After the District Court entered judgment, Congress adopted the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which provide, in part, as follows: For a period of 2 years after the date of enactment of the Clean … With its enact- ment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and a two-year moratorium on the regulation of residue ash, Congress has rendered academic the issues raised in this case.
502 U.S. 974Exhibit Volume — Nishida v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (No. 615)
Supreme Court brief · Exhibit Volume · 1957
R25 PERIODIC PHYSICAL EXAMINA-. riGQNS. … An outside attendant should maintain censtant: observation (see 6% Tank and Equipment Cleaning and ; Repairs), Hose ss ire ib) masks with hose inlet in vapor- atmosphere, or Air-line masks
Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT SCAQMD’s Fleet Rules are preempted by the Clean Air Act. … The Fleet Rules Conflict With The Purposes Of The Clean Air Act.
541 U.S. 246Petitioners Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 2009
to specified federal actions under the Clean Water Act. 1 Leg. … Pozsgai, 999 F.2d 719, 729 (8d Cir. 1993) (giving deference to Army Corps of Engineers interpretation of Clean Water Act because, “[lJike the Clean Air Act in Chevron, the Clean Water Act addresses
556 U.S. 208Joint Appendix Vol II — Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Tribe
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix Vol II · 1999
They are reproduced in the Appendix to the Respondent Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s Brief In Opposition on the pages indicated below: Act of March 3, 1909, 35 Stat. 844 (“1909 Act”). la Act of June 22 … , 1910, 36 Stat. 583 (“1910 Act”). 3a Pub.
526 U.S. 865Opposition Brief — Honeywell International Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Mexichem Fluor Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Aug 27, 2018
Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. … In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq., by enacting a new Title VI to implement the Montreal Protocol. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, Tit.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.