Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
or water heaters during peak periods, rarely run those more at non-peak times), which itself reduces power plants’ emissions of air pollutants and attendant public health harms. … air, clean transportation and clean energy policies at the regional and national levels.
Joint Appendix — Watt v. California
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1983
As you are undoubtedly aware, the federal Environmental Protection agency has imposed sanctions on California under the Clean Air Act. … , the Endangered Species Act, the Coastal Zone Management Act, the Clean Air Act, and the National En- vironmental Policy Act.
461 U.S. 925Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 16, 2018
of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.); (2) the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); or 3 (3) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.). 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d). … These determinations are linked to specific state findings under the CWA, the Coastal Zone Management Act, and the Clean Air Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 717b(d).
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 30, 2025
Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC., et al., Respondents. … Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC, et al., Respondents.
Reply Brief — American Lung Ass'n v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
Garland Independent School District, 489 U.S. 782 (1989) ..............66. 7 STATUTES: Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 ef seq.: & TiXs), 42 USC. & FO ie ee 8 § SO/(G), 42 U.S.C. | FOR Ss vigss … The decisionmaking scheme enacted for setting NAAQS under the Clean Air Act is no different.
528 U.S. 818Petition — Romero-Barcelo v. Weinberger
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
(g)(1); Section 7002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §6972; and Section 304 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7604. … Claims under the Federal Clean Air Act Plaintiffs Romero Barcelé, et. al., Medina, et al., and Zenon, et al., claim that Defendant Navy’s activities violate the Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §7401
454 U.S. 816Opposition Brief — Arkansas Wildlife Federation v. ICI Americas, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995
. §1319(g)(6)(A) of the Clean Water Act bars plaintiff’s citizen suit brought under that Act where the state had previously com- menced and was diligently prosecuting an administrative enforcement … Arkansas has been author- ized by EPA to administer the federal NPDES permit program under the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act, whereas Massachusetts’ act had not received certification
513 U.S. 1147Amicus Brief — Alabama Power Co. v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Introduction Section 123 of the Clean Air Act“ requires the states to use good engineering practice (GEP) stack height assump- tions when establishing emissions limitations under Section 110 of the … Air Act.
467 U.S. 1248Opposition — Selco Supply Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1981
II) 7607(b) (60-day period under the Clean Air Act); 33 U.S.C. 1369 (90-day period under the Clean Water Act). … In interpreting the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, the courts uniformly have held that the time limit bars late filings. Sun Enterprises Ltd. v.
450 U.S. 1030Amicus Curiae Brief — Engine Mfrs. Assn. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
ACT’S UNAMBIGUOUS Clean Air Act of 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 1. … 15-16 Clean Air Act, Subchapter II, Part C, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7581- a 23, 25 iv Clean Air Act § 241(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7581(2) ....ccccccccescseseee 25 Clean Air Act § 243(e)(2), 42 U.S.C. § 7583(e)(2) .
541 U.S. 246Brief for the US in Opposition — White v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the US in Opposition · 1958
On the’ dress.in-the package was a cleaning . ticket marked “Fiel” and followed by some numbers (R. 51). … The court noted’ - (239 F. 2d at 823) that: “Provision has, since this Act, been maue.for air parcel-post service, 62 Stat. 1097, 39 U.S.C.A: $ 475, but this was done by sepa- rate Act, making the
358 U.S. 829Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 21, 2026
Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-actoverview/clean-air-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026) ..................................... 9 U.S. … Agency, Clean Air Act Requirements and History, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/cleanair-act-requirements-and-history (last visited May 20, 2026). 10 II.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hanna v. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Air Act. … Air Act.
546 U.S. 1004Respondents Brief — County of Maui, Hawaii, Petitioner v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Oct 23, 2018
EPA, Clean Water Rule Response to Comments—Topic 10: Legal Analysis, at 386 & n.742 (June 30, 2015);14 see, e.g., EPA Region 6, NPDES Permit No. NMG010000, pt. … In that case, “EPA itself . . . repeatedly acknowledged that applying the PSD and Title V permitting requirements to greenhouse gases would be inconsistent with—in fact, would overthrow—the [Clean Air]
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 13, 2018
In one instance, the air conditioning stopped working fully for a period of up to two days. App. 20a. It was August—in Florida—and Saunders’s cell had eight inmates crammed inside. … Wilson, 311 F.3d 1340, 1346 (11th Cir. 2002).2 2 Defendants were acting within their discretionary authority during the relevant time period as employees of the Jail. 51a Once a defendant shows that
Petitioners Brief — United States Gypsum Co. v. Galeota
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942
Statement of Case The plaintiff’s proof as to defendant’s negligence was limited by the application of the New York State Statute of Limitations (New York Civil Practice Act, Section 49) to a period … The plaintiff’s proof of the defendant’s negligence was limited by the New York Statute of Limitations (Civil Practice Act, Section 49) to a period of three years prior to the bringing of this action
315 U.S. 813Amicus Curiae Brief — Burlington v. Dague
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Delaware Valley Citizens Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 562 n.6 (1986) (Delaware Valley I). … . ®* These statutes include, inter alia, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(k); the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. 1988: the Clean Air Act, 42
505 U.S. 557Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 1, 2021
Air Act. … The Text The hardship exemption provisions of the Clean Air Act’s RFS program are set forth at 42 U.S.C. § 7545(o)(9).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Air Act); 42 U.S.C. § 11046 (Emergency Planning and Com- munity Right-to-Know Act). … See Clean Air Council v. Sunoco, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5346, at *15- *16 (D.
544 U.S. 913Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 11, 2025
The Clean Air Act thus contains several limitations on citizen suits. … FEDERALISM PRINCIPLES UNDERLIE ANY CLEAN AIR ACT INTERPRETATION.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.