Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.64s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Tullis v. Lee, Smart, Cook, Martin & Patterson P. S., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
The action taken by Attorney’s in this case, enabled their clients to violate at least two Federal Statutes: (1) The Federal Clean Air Act and (2) the Federal SE, SS ae a Comprehensive Environmental … The only remedy was to remove the entire system; Take the Furnace apart, clean it thoroughly and replace all of the Air return and hot air lines with new piping.
534 U.S. 1020Appendix — Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1996
The agreement required nightly cleaning as well as periodic stripping and waxing of National’s floors. … The court pointed out that cleaning windows was part of the building owner’s business, because the owner provided it to its tenants as a service along with electricity, heat, air conditioning, and janitor
517 U.S. 1208Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Aug 10, 2022
App. 32a) or by the Clean Air Act itself (id. at 34a-38a). … Air Act, as petitioners claim.5 The distinction between federal common law once governing claims like respondents’, and federal common law continuing to govern such claims after the Clean Air Act, is
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993
Delaware Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546 (1986). … Air Act’s fee shifting provision. 478 U.S. at 549-53.
507 U.S. 906Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · May 14, 2026
But because the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, the court conducted a more limited inquiry into “whether the [Clean Air Act] preempts [respondents’] claims.” Id. at 11a. … If state law could not be applied before the enactment of the Clean Air Act, it thus follows that state law remains 30 inapplicable unless the Clean Air Act affirmatively authorizes it.
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2021
See 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment Summary, EPA, https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/1990clean-air-act-amendment-summary (last visited Dec. 20, 2021).These constitutional considerations reinforce … Simply put, the text and structure of the Clean Air Act in general, and section 111 in particular, do not permit “system” to be read as the D.C. Circuit did.
Reply Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2007
,” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act, even though the court below did not reach the issue. … This Court has emphatically applied this principle in interpreting the Clean Air Act. In Whitman v.
549 U.S. 497Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 3, 2026
Congress does not preserve remedies it means to destroy.5 The Clean Air Act’s effect was to displace the federal common law 4 Congress thereby demonstrated that if it had intended the Clean Air Act to … Having held only that the Clean Air Act displaced federal common law, American Electric Power Co. v.
Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Jul 29, 2024
The Court has regularly granted certiorari in similarly important Clean Air Act cases over the last decade. See West Virginia v. EPA, 597 U.S. 697 (2022); Michigan v. EPA, 576 U.S. 743 (2015); EPA v. … Statutory And Regulatory Background Section 111 of the Clean Air Act governs performance standards for “stationary sources” of air pollution. 42 U.S.C. § 7411.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Nat'l Mining Ass'n v. Envtl. Prot. Agency, 135 S. Ct. 703 (2014) (No. 14-49)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014
Air Act. … This program is therefore a prime example of “cooperative federalism” under the Clean Air Act.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bornhurst v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1948
It was customary and necessary for men to go out on deck for a breath of fresh air (R., pp. 191, 200). … ‘‘If we can’t get a breath of fresh air, certainly we couldn’t do our work’’; and (R., p. 191) ‘Well, it is customary and necessary for a man to go out on deck and take a breath of fresh air in a relaxed
333 U.S. 867Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
First, Calpine agrees with the petitioners that the clear and straightforward language of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) provides the U.S. … Reilly, 893 F.2d 901, 909-10 (7" Cir. 1990) (“{Ijn passing the Clean Air Act Amendments, Congress intended to stimulate the advancement of pollution control technology.”); Husqvarna v.
549 U.S. 497Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Farr Co. v. Gratiot (No. 711)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1956
The dust is retained in the air filter panel as an accumulating dust load until the air filter panels are removed, cleaned, re- oiled and again inserted for use. … It is, of course, desirable that the efficiency, which determines the ability of the filter to clean the air, be high.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994
Carey, 535 F.2d 165, 172 (2d Cir. 1976) (Clean Air Act); see also Friends of the Earth v. Conrail Corp., 168 F.2d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 1985) (Clean Water Act). … Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq
513 U.S. 811Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sea Hawk Seafoods, Inc. v. Locke
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2010
One such statute (among many others) is Section 307 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7607, which mandates a 60-day limitations period for judicial review of clean air regulations. … Air Act.
559 U.S. 938Petitioners Brief — Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1981
Feb necccccscciniieteeee 15 Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. (Supp. I) 7604 _.............. 8,11 Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. … Air Act.
453 U.S. 1Amicus Curiae Brief — City of New York v. Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2011
promote better air quality. … Local governments have adopted clean-taxicab incentive programs to promote air quality and increase the efficiency of their transportation networks.
562 U.S. 1264Transcript of Record — Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Transcript of Record · 1965
With reference to the comments made by Mr. … after you cleaned up?
382 U.S. 841Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 24, 2022
the Clean Air Act. … For example, the 1970 amendments to the Clean Air Act direct EPA to periodically determine the types of stationary sources that significantly contribute to “air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated
Amicus Curiae Brief — United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Environmental Defense is dedicated to assuring that all people, including future generations, enjoy clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. … Clean Air Task 14 Force, Diesel Soot Health Impacts: Oneida County, New York, available at http://www.catf.us/projects/diesel / dieselhealth/county.php?
550 U.S. 330
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.