Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
0.60s
Agency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Orders arose out of substantially similar facts and occurred within a subset of the time period as the violations alleged in a related class action (the “Class Action”).3 In the Orders, the Commission … All persons who desire to comment on the Plan may submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice: 1.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
On July 13, 2021, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making … by using the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or 3. by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Securities and Exchange Commissionpwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Agency decision · Agency decision
Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r). h. Applicant Contact: Shawn C. Puzen, Environmental Consultant, Integrys Business Support, LLC, 700 North Adams Street, P.O. … The Director’s Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
When the PSA was renegotiated for the period after its initial 2-year term, there was no comparable provision for a "Physician Access Bonus". … Ideal Cleaning Co. v. Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 529, 531 (1934); Burnett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-181, affd. 67 Fed. Appx. 248 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
When the PSA was renegotiated for the period after its initial 2-year term, there was no comparable provision for a "Physician Access Bonus". … Ideal Cleaning Co. v. Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 529, 531 (1934); Burnett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-181, affd. 67 Fed. Appx. 248 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
When the PSA was renegotiated for the period after its initial 2-year term, there was no comparable provision for a "Physician Access Bonus". … Ideal Cleaning Co. v. Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 529, 531 (1934); Burnett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-181, affd. 67 Fed. Appx. 248 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
When the PSA was renegotiated for the period after its initial 2-year term, there was no comparable provision for a "Physician Access Bonus". … Ideal Cleaning Co. v. Commissioner, 30 B.T.A. 529, 531 (1934); Burnett v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-181, affd. 67 Fed. Appx. 248 (5th Cir. 2003).
United States Tax CourtFederal Register / Vol. 72, No. 12 / Friday, January 19, 2007 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Department of Energy, pursuant to the authority vested on the Deputy Secretary by sections 301(b), 302(a), 402(e), 641, 642, 643 and 644 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. … DE–PM–75– 85SW00117, as amended, effective for the period of January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2010.
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. … The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
of 1933, Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sections 203(e), 203(f) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Section 9(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, Making Findings … The Commission received no substantive comments on the Plan during the comment period.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Commission received one hundred twenty-three (123) comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. … Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. … online instructions for submitting comments.
Internal Revenue ServiceCBCA 5089 GRANTED IN PART; CBCA 5619 GRANTED:
Agency decision · Agency decision
Erosion control work shall be kept current immediately preceding expected seasonal periods of precipitation or runoff. … Bearing that standard in mind, we find that USDA acted reasonably when it suspended Johnson’s operations.
Civilian Board of Contract AppealsAgency decision · Agency decision
Pappas, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, One Penn 1 Securities Act Rel. No. 11032 (Feb. 22, 2022). Securities Act Rel. No. 11033 (Feb. 22, 2022). 3 Securities Act Rel. … by using the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or 3. by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.