Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
0.42s
Agency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent's failure to act on the Thompsons' 1982.return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Plan could submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice. … Countryman Acting Secretary 5 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6). 2
Securities and Exchange CommissionThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. … We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Orders arose out of substantially similar facts and occurred within a subset of the time period as the violations alleged in a related class action (the “Class Action”).3 In the Orders, the Commission … All persons who desire to comment on the Plan may submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice: 1.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
On July 13, 2021, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making … by using the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or 3. by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
(Exchange Act Rel. … Fund recipients (Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period. … Countryman Secretary 3 Exchange Act Rel. No. 97389 (Apr. 27, 2023). Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionUNITED STATES tfEliTON ~(l? :i~)c;!d
Agency decision · Agency decision
Tyle December 8, 1999 Page 2 Generally, under the 1940 Act, fuds may, but are not required to, suspend redemptions and postpone payment for redemptions already tendered for any period durng which the … This definition also is used in Rule 2a-4 under the 1940 Act as the required basis for computing periodically the current NA V of funds for the purpose of pricing their shares.
Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 73, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 8, 2008 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
Hard-copies of the Final EIS have also been mailed to those who requested that format during the scoping and comment periods for the proposed Project. … Comment Date: February 1, 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.