Documents

PRACTICING BEFORE THE

Agency decision · Agency decision

The parties must comply with the time periods and dates set by the BCA’s rules and by the board. … A disposition by decision is final when the period for appealing the decision has expired.

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION;

Agency decision · Agency decision

As the Claims Court itself acknowledged, such notices are “tentative determinations issued to invite contractor comment rather than as final decisions.” … final decision on a Government claim by a date certain, 4KG-ACC cites to 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(4), which provides the Board authority to “direct a contracting officer to issue a decision in a specific period

THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND

Agency decision · Agency decision

Discussion Jurisdiction The Board has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109 (2012). … During the task order period of performance, DMI provided no interpretation services.

MOTION FOR SUMMARY RELIEF DENIED: November 28, 2007

Agency decision · Agency decision

National Forest Management Act of 1976, 16 U.S.C. § 1604(g)(3)(E) (2000). … I’m not a soils scientist, therefore, I am not qualified to comment on the arguments given to substantiate the decision. . . .

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY RELIEF DENIED;

Agency decision · Agency decision

The subject matter of our dispute is defined in an affidavit provided by Peter Cicuto, a retired Global employee who was the company’s vice president of operations during much of the time period with which … These comments were transmitted to Global on the same day. Id., Exhibit 29.

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY RELIEF GRANTED IN PART;

Agency decision · Agency decision

SI reviewed this document and returned it to Turner with comments, and Turner resubmitted the document to SI on November 21, 2006. … SI provided its comments to Turner by transmittal dated November 9, 2007.

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE IN PART; DENIED IN PART: March 5, 2020

Agency decision · Agency decision

The S&T science advisor reviewed and commented on the draft BAA 15DHS-0002 on July 18, 2013. Transcript at 289. … Cox acted conscientiously in the discharge of their duties.

DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; DENIED IN PART:

Agency decision · Agency decision

copies” to Mohamad Elmahmoud, the contracting officer’s representative (COR) for at least two of the task orders3 (to whom MLU refers as the contract’s “Quality Assurance Specialist”), for review and comment … the application [sic] Contract Disputes Act interest rate and . . . limited to one year of interest from the date submitted.”

RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY RELIEF GRANTED IN PART;

Agency decision · Agency decision

Thereafter, the original performance period for the task order was extended by GSA to May 31, 2005. The extension was done through four written modifications. … Other issues We briefly comment on two other issues raised in the briefing by the parties.

CBCA 2653 GRANTED: December 9, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

he commented that an NRCS memorandum dated June 16, 2004, regarding a 2003 survey at the groin (Appellant’s Supp. … Connole found this period to be noncompensable. During this period appellant was not working on the contract. This was determined to be a non-work period.

DENIED: March 31, 2016

Agency decision · Agency decision

is not the same as listening for a six-hour period). … A few comments on the dissent The majority has read the same record as the dissent. The Board reviews a contracting officer’s decision on a de novo basis.

CBCA 5541 DISMISSED;

Agency decision · Agency decision

A question and answer period followed the posting of the solicitation. … That view was consistent with Mare’s superintendent’s comment that requiring fifty expansion couplings was “unusual.”

GRANTED: March 17, 2011

Agency decision · Agency decision

Warren’s bid was based on using the RPM roof, and its comments as to the warranty referred to that product. Supplemental Appeal File, Exhibit 9. … David Sabel, chief of engineering, provided a memorandum to the acting CO. The memo affirmed confidence in Mr.

DENIED: May 28, 2014

Agency decision · Agency decision

addition to candidate two (whom the agency deemed to be qualified), candidates one, three, and four possessed the required teaching experience and met the educational requirements; the contractor did not comment … terms of the contract both by creating a requirement that the agency had to be able to contact previous culinary employers to verify culinary employment, even if the employment was outside the five-year period

In the Matter of RENEE COBB

Agency decision · Agency decision

the situation reveal that the employee acted in a prudent manner.” … We have no authority to review or comment upon any of these additional concerns that Ms. Cobb has raised. Gamtessa Addisu, CBCA 4774-RELO, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,131, at 176,358-59.

MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Agency decision · Agency decision

necessary for completion, the Contractor may request, in writing, an extension of time, to be received by the Contracting Officer within 10 days from the beginning of the delay, or within such further period … Appellant’s Certified Claim On July 8, 2020, appellant submitted to the contracting officer a certified claim pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101–7109 (2018), in the amount of

THIS OPINION WAS INITIALLY ISSUED UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER AND

Agency decision · Agency decision

Restatement of Contracts, Second, § 168, comment a. at 456. Predictions of the cost to construct a project not yet designed clearly fit this definition. Id. at 89,437 (emphasis added). … It was during this period that [the A/E firm] had the opportunity to more precisely define its direct design costs. ....

DENIED: March 20, 2026

Agency decision · Agency decision

necessary for completion, the Contractor may request, in writing, an extension of time, to be received by the Contracting Officer within 10 days from the beginning of the delay, or within such further period … Stellar J is seeking its actual additional costs attributable to the changes, plus interest and attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Opposition at 13.

GRANTED IN PART: April 20, 2007

Agency decision · Agency decision

While the FS cited these logs, it did not point the Board to specific provisions or comments in the logs which support or establish the FS position. … Had the FS so acted, we would have enforced the detail in favor of the FS.