Case law

Cavalier v. Catholic Univ. of Am.

306 F. Supp. 3d 9 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 2018

Browning v. Clinton , 292 F.3d 235 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Corp. v.

In Re Lindmark

747 A.2d 1148 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

In re Manville, 538 A.2d 1128, 1132 (D.C.1988) (en banc) (Manville II) (citing Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 246 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957)). … Board.” 2 .

Jones v. United States

277 A.2d 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 10, 1971

Appellant was tall, had dark brown skin, long hair with “little side locks” and was wearing green pants and a brown topcoat. … See also United States v. Wilson, 435 F.2d 403 (D.C.Cir., 1970).

Saline Parents v. Merrick Garland

88 F.4th 298 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 2023

See Trump v. New York, 141 S. … The Complaint recounts that school board members have complained about parents “attacking the board” by calling into question the board’s integrity and morals. Id. ¶ 89, J.A. 24.

Russell v. District of Columbia

747 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1990

In Conley v. … See Ottenberg v.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

402 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 28, 1968

In Railway Clerks v. … The Board referred to Railway Clerks v. Association, but only as reinforcing the correctness of the past policy.

Hadera v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

136 F.3d 1338 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 1998

See Foti v. INS, 375 U.S. 217, 219 n.1 (1963) ("The granting of voluntary departure relief does not result in the alien's not being subject to an outstanding final order of deportation."); Karimian-Kaklaki v. … See Ma- yard v. INS, 129 F.3d 438, 439 (8th Cir. 1997) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction appeal filed eighty-four days after final order); Narayan v.

In re Larry Klayman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2020

Accordingly, we accept the Board’s conclusion rejecting the finding that Mr. Klayman testified falsely. V. … The Board gave this matter little weight because of Mr.

In re Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2023

(Board Docket No. 18-BD-058) (Argued March 16, 2022 Decided July 27, 2023) John O. Iweanoge, II, for respondent. Myles V. … We agree with the Board that Ms.

Johnson v. District of Columbia

612 F. App'x 619 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2015

See Coming Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188, 195 , 94 S.Ct. 2223 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974). … See Hamilton v. Geithner, 666 F.3d 1344, 1351 (D.C.Cir.2012); Kersey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., 586 F.3d 13, 16-17 (D.C.Cir.2009).

Marta v. McCarthy

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

Wilhelmus v. Geren, 796 F. … V.

Hanes v. Pace, Secretary of the Army

203 F.2d 225 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 12, 1953

Since Hanes was not removed from the active list pursuant to the Act of July 29, 1941, he was not granted a hearing before the Board of Review. 6 . United States v. Burchard, 1888, 125 U. … S. 176, 179 , 8 S.Ct. 832 , 31 L.Ed. 662, 663 ; Potts v. United States, 1888, 125 U. S. 173, 175 , 8 S.Ct. 830 , 31 L.Ed. 661, 662 ; McBlair v. United States, 1884, 19 Ct.Cl. 528 ; Runkle v.

In re Buffington

911 A.2d 1240 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 2006

PER CURIAM: In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent John V. … As we find support in the record for the Board’s findings, we accept them, and adopt the sanction the Board recommended. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that John V.

Titanium Metals Corp. v. Mossinghoff

603 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 28, 1984

Pro-Col Corp. v. Commissioner of Patents, 141 U.S. App.D.C. 142,143, 436 F.2d 296, 297 (1970) (citations omitted). … DeSeversky v. Brenner, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 369 , 370, 424 F.2d 857, 858 (1970) (emphasis the Court’s). “Deference is owed to the findings of the Patent Office.” Puharich v.

Lans v. GATEWAY 2000, INC.

84 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1999

During the normal course of discovery, defendant discovered that, on October 19, 1989, Lans had executed an “Assignment and Declaration” in which he sold, assigned and transferred to Uni-board Aktiebolag (“Uniboard” or “Uni-board … See Stafford v.

Mahdi v. Poretsky Management, Inc.

433 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1981

See D.C.Code 1973 §§ 16-1501 et seq., 45-901 et seq.; Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56 [ 92 S.Ct. 862 , 31 L.Ed.2d 36 ] (1972). Prior to Brown v. … In Mendes v.

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

772 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2011

Co. v. … See eBay, Inc. v.

Carter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

503 F.3d 143 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 2007

Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and BROWN, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … See Zipes v.

American Cable Co. v. John A. Roebling's Sons Co.

65 F.2d 801 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 22, 1933

It appears that appellant Briggs was involved in two interferences in the Patent Office: Interference No. 58312, Briggs v. Sunderland v. Rairden v. Damon; and interference No. 58313, Briggs v. Rairden v. Damon. … the Board of Appeals, since it acted solely-upon the motion to dissolve the interference.

Bell v. Jones

523 A.2d 982 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1987

Browning v. Maurice B. … for the purpose of securing an FHA loan); Browning v.