Opinion

Johnson v. District of Columbia

  • 612 F. App'x 619
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
May 18, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Henderson, Kavanaugh, Wilkins
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.0%

The opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs filed by the parties, see Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j), and the motion for appointment of counsel. It is ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. In civil cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment be affirmed. Appellant failed to establish a prima facie case under the Equal Pay Act, because he failed to adduce sufficient evidence that he received unequal pay in comparison to female co-workers. See Coming Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188, 195 , 94 S.Ct. 2223 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974). As to appellant’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act, appellees offered a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for not increasing appellant’s salary. Appellant has failed to produce evidence sufficient for a reasonable jury to find that the asserted reason was not the actual reason and that appellees intentionally discriminated against him. See Hamilton v. Geithner, 666 F.3d 1344, 1351 (D.C.Cir.2012); Kersey v. Wash.

Metro. Area Transit Auth., 586 F.3d 13, 16-17 (D.C.Cir.2009). Because appellant does not address the district court’s decision concerning his retaliation claim, that claim is forfeited. See U.S. ex rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp., 380 F.3d 488, 497 (D.C.Cir.2004). Finally, appellant has not shown any abuse of discretion in the denial of his motion to alter or amend the district court’s judgment. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208-09 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.