Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

0.44s

  • Priest v. Crawford Homes, Inc.

    Superior Court of Maine · May 20, 2004

    Igloo is not licensed by the State of Maine, Manufactured Housing Board. Igloo is not authorized by the Secretary of State of the State of Maine to do business in the State of Maine as a foreign corporation. … Dorf v. Complastik Corp., 1999 ME 133, 99’s 9, 10,11, . 735 A.2d 984,988.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bolduc v. National Semiconductor Corp.

    35 F. Supp. 2d 106 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 21, 1998

    See Berg v. … Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 152 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1726 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curium ), and strict adherence to such limitations periods “is the best guarantee of evenhanded administration of the law.” Mohasco Corp. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Bank of America Corp.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 21, 2009

    Franklin Property Trust v. … Pro Se Bank of America Rufus Brown, Esq. Atlantic Homes/Marc Fournier Steven Wright, Esq. Anna Collins, Esq.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Cookson

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 9, 2002

    They left Scott’s in Cookson’s Geo Tracker, and — stopped at a convenience store, where Cookson bought brown gloves for Vantol. … State v. Brown, 552 A.2d 12, 15 (Me. 1988). “The evidence in support of the motion must be convincing, as there is a proper reluctance to give a defendant a second trial after he has had his day in court.”

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • COUNTS v. STATE OF MAINE

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 11, 2025

    Nevertheless, in line with the First Circuit’s instruction to district courts reviewing pro se pleadings to construe these submissions liberally, see Sanchez v. Brown Univ., No. 23-1983, 2024 U.S. App. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Green v. Comm'r, Dep't of Mental Health

    Superior Court of Maine · Nov 29, 2000

    Centamore v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). Three factors have been adopted as an analytical tool to determine the specific dictates of due process. Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ramsey v. H & R Block

    Superior Court of Maine · Dec 23, 2009

    Sllaw v. SOli them Aroostook COIIIIII. Sell. Dist., 683 A.2d 502,503 (Me. 1996) (quoting McAfee v. … See National Association of Mortgage Brokers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, 773 F.Supp.2d 151, 158, 171-77 (D.D.C. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • JOYCE

    District Court, D. Maine · Oct 23, 2025

    V, and applies to noncitizens in immigration proceedings, Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 306 (1993). Ms. … inquiry is whether ‘the balance of equities so favors the movant that justice requires the 4 Petitioner’s claim that her due process rights are being violated is bolstered by the fact that a recently issued opinion by the Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Richardson v. Decoste

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 18, 2014

    Levine v. R.B.K. Caly Corp., 2001 ME 77, 1 8, 770 A.2d 653; Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. … Plaintiffs allege the ACCA and the members of the executive board of the ACCA owed Plaintiffs a fiduciary duty.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MAINE FOUNDATION v. US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES

    District Court, D. Maine · May 31, 2022

    Admin. v. … Widi v. McNeil, No. 2:12-CV-00188-JAW, 2016 WL 4394724, at *28 (D. Me. Aug. 16, 2016) (quoting Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In the Matter of Robert M.A. Nadeau

    168 A.3d 746 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 20, 2017

    See LeGrand v. York County Judge of Probate, No. YORSC-CV-2015-269 (Me. Super. Ct., York Cty., Mar. 29, 2016); LeGrand v. York County Judge of Probate, Law Ct. No. Yor-16-194 (Me. … of Overseers of the Bar v. Nadeau, No. Bar-05-03, 2006 Me. LEXIS 167 (Me.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Woodfords Family Services, Inc. v. Casey

    832 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 14, 2011

    See Hatch v. … Ross-Simons of Warwick, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State of Maine v. Sanborn

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 28, 2019

    MF. v. New York Executive Department Division ofParole, 640 F.3d 491, 495-96 (2d Cir. 2011); Doe v. Pennsylvania Board ofProbation and Parole, 513 F.3d 95, 104 (3d Cir. 2008). … Compare Shields v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Schwartz v. Maine Unemployment Insurance Commission

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 25, 2004

    (quoting Gulick v. Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1207-08 (Me. 1982)). … In Meek v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sullivan v. Republic of Cuba

    289 F. Supp. 3d 231 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 2017

    Mamani v. … See V.L. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MESNER v. FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC

    District Court, D. Maine · Mar 14, 2024

    Of Diane Brown (ECF No. 15) (replying to his response), Resp. to Mot. (ECF NO. 23) (responding to his own motion for sanctions), Resp. to Mot. … Kourembanas v. InterCoast Colls., 373 F. Supp. 3d 303, 320 (D. Me. 2019). In short, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pouliot v. Town of Fairfield

    226 F. Supp. 2d 233 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 4, 2002

    See Brown v. Hot, Sexy & Safer Prod., Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 534 (1st Cir.1995). “[0]rdinarily, one who can be removed only for ‘cause’ has a constitutionally protected ‘property interest.’” Wojcik v. Mass. … Borucki [v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • The Nidarholm

    26 F.2d 92 · District Court, D. Maine · May 21, 1928

    In Corsar v. Spreckels & Bros. … This case is cited in Harloff et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Faulcon v. Ponte

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 1, 2014

    Board of Environmental Protection, 452 A.2d 1202, 1209 (Me. 1982). … Rangeley Crossroads Coal v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Testa's, Inc. v. Coopersmith

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 1, 2015

    Brown Development Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, ~ 11, 956 A. 2d 104, 108 (citing, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., v. Spaulding, 2007 ME 116, ~ 20,930 A.2d 1025, 1030; Dehahn v. Innes, 356 A.2d 711, 717 (Me. 1976)). … ("almost any writing is sufficient for statute of frauds purposes" Brown Development Corp., 2008 ME 146, ~ 12). 7 In Chapman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.