Case law

Falconer v. PENN MARITIME, INC.

380 F. Supp. 2d 2 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 2, 2005

Diefenbach v. Sheridan Transp., 229 F.3d 27 , 30 (1st Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Corey, 207 F.3d 84, 88 (1st Cir.2000)). … A graduate of Duke Medical School and board certified surgeon, Dr. Flint specializes in trauma. Id. at 4-6. Following his surgical residency, he served in Vietnam. Id. at 5.

ALDAWOODY v. CANDELA CORPORATION

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 26, 2025

Workers of Am. v. 163 Pleasant St. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). Mr.

State v. Campbell

314 A.2d 398 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 28, 1974

As was well said in Smith v. … Austin v.

CWCO, INC. v. Superintendent of Ins.

703 A.2d 1258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 1, 1997

703 A.2d 1258 (1997) 1997 ME 226 CWCO, INC., et al. v. SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE, et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued October 10, 1997. Decided December 1, 1997. *1259 Thomas V. … See Sabattus School Committee v.

Noring v. Kilmartin

Superior Court of Maine · May 14, 2009

Casco Northern Bank v. JBI Assocs., 667 A.2d 856, 859 (Me. 1995) (citing Koch v. Koch Indus., 798 F.supp. 1525, 1530 (D. Kan. 1992)). … Bar R. 3.4(b)(3)(i). 3  The Board of Overseers of the Bar (the Board) has provided guidance on potential conflicts of interest with respect to prospective clients.

State v. Marcotte

148 Me. 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1952

Bath v. Reed, 78 Me. 276 . … See Gay v. Buckhannon (W. Va.), 123 S. E. 183 ; State v. Curry, 98 W. Va. 72 , 126 S. E. 489 ; Bannister v. Glasgow (W. Va.), 185 S. E. 2 ; State v. Langford (W. Va., 1940), 9 S. E. (2nd) 865.

United States of America v. Maine Department of Education

District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2025

Corp. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. … Compare ECF No. 28 at 9-11, with ECF No. 42-1 at 3-4; see also Smith v. Brown Univ., 695 F.

State v. Rudman

126 Me. 177 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 1927

State v. Webber, 125 Me., 319; State v. Keene, 34 Me., 500; United States v. Cook, 17 Wall. (84 U. S.), 168. … In Beasley v.

WEBER

District Court, D. Maine · Oct 24, 2025

v. Campbell, 1998 ME 70, ¶ 7, 708 A.2d 283. … See Leighton v.

Dalglish v. Griffin

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 11, 2012

Dept. of Human Services v. Pelletier, 2009 ME 11, 964 A.2d 630. … Further, from 2002 to 2007, Trevor is either at boarding school or staying primarily with Dr. Dalglish. Under these circumstances, Dr. Dalglish could reasonably infer that Ms.

State v. Sprague

394 A.2d 253 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1978

See State v. Hale, 371 S.W.2d 249 (Mo.1963); State v. Leos, 7 Or.App. 211 , 490 P.2d 521 (1971); Valentine v. Commonwealth, 187 Va. 946 , 48 S.E.2d 264 (1948). See generally 40 C.J.S. Homicide § 112. … In State v.

Boutot v. State

380 A.2d 195 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 28, 1977

See Green v. State, Me., 245 A.2d 147 (1968), or b. by use of a petition for declaratory judgment pursuant to 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 5951, et seq. See Higgins v. Robbins, Me., 265 A.2d 90 (1970); Reed v. … See Higgins v. Robbins, Me., 270 A.2d 81 (1970); Kuhn v. State Me., 254 A.2d 591 (1969); Hartley v. State, Me., 249 A.2d 38 (1969); Cressey v.

Thompson v. Gaudette

148 Me. 288 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1952

Brown v. Veazie, 25 Me., 359. ‘To prevent forfeitures strict constructions are not unreasonable.’ Cressey v. Parks, 76 Me., 532. … Soutter v. Atwood, 34 Me. 153 ; Soutter v. Porter, 27 Me. 405, 416-17 ; Duncan v. Sylvester, 24 Me. 482 ; Bigelow v. Littlefield, 52 Me. 24 ; Hutchinson v. Chase, 39 Me. 508, 513 ; 14 Am. Jur. 151 , Sec. 86.

South Portland Associates v. City of South Portland

2000 Me. 29 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2000

Sackman et al., Nichols on Eminent Domain § 9.07[7][f] (3rd ed.1999); see also, e .g., Mainer v. Canal Auth. of State, 467 So.2d 989, 991 (Fla.1985); Board of Educ. of Unified Sch. Dist. 512 v. … See Francis v. Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy Hous. Auth., 1999 ME 164, ¶ 5 , 740 A.2d 575, 577 ; see also Passamaquoddy Water Dist. v.

Maine Education Ass'n Benefits Trust v. Cioppa

842 F. Supp. 2d 386 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 3, 2012

See Ty, Inc. v. … Once eligibility has been established, the school board and the employees decide together, by a collaborative vote, whether the employees will be offered the MEABT plan.

City of Bangor v. City of Brewer

142 Me. 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 7, 1946

Decision in Inhabitants of Whiting v. … This is contrary both to Inhabitants of Whiting v.

Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.

870 A.2d 146 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 2005

See also Schroeder v. … Compare Roby v.

Dale J. Holman v. City of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 7, 2023

Holman contends that the Planning Board’s decision must be vacated because the zoning for the parcel is “egal” and the Planning Board erred when it found that STJ’s application complied with the City Code’s site plan standards … In Spickler v. Key Bank of S.

Poussard v. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated of Lewiston

479 A.2d 881 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 29, 1984

Their primary argument is based on Webb v. County Board of Education of Dyer County, Tennessee, 715 F.2d 254 (6th Cir.1983), a case involving employment discrimination. … Plaintiffs also rely on Postow v.

Prudential Life Insurance v. Norbert LaChance

113 Me. 550 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 28, 1915

Lord Thurlow in Gwynne v. Heaton, 1 Brown’s Ch. … Co. v.