Case law

Betts v. Brown

219 Ga. 782 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Mar 18, 1964

See Wold v. Grozalsky, 277 N.Y. 364 ( 14 NE2d 437 ); Carter v. E.T. & W.N.C. Transp. Co., 35 Tenn. App. 196 ( 243 SW2d 505 ). What is ruled here is not contrary to Baldwin v. … See Stapler v. Anderson, 177 Ga. 434, 436 (170 SE 498); National Mortgage Corp. v. Bullard, 178 Ga. 451, 454 ( 173 SE 401 ).

State v. Brown

31 Or. App. 501 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471 , 83 S Ct 407 , 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963); State v. Evans, 16 Or App 189 , 517 P2d 1225 , Sup Ct review denied (1974); State v. … In Terry v.

State v. Brown

119 Kan. 874 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Dec 5, 1925

(State v. Peterson, 107 Kan. 641, 645 , 193 Pac. 342 . See, also, State v. Stephens, 109 Kan. 254 , 198 Pac. 1087 ; State v. Robinson, 118 Kan. 775 ; Goldsmith-Grant Co. v. U. S., 254 United States 505; H. A. … White Auto Co. v. Collins, 136 Ark. 81 .)

Brown v. State

88 Tenn. 566 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1890

Edwards v. The State, 8 Lea, 411 .

Morris v. Brown

67 Wash. 351 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1912

Utter also testified that Brown told him that he would pay the Wells & Morris account. … Crans v. Hunter, 28 N. Y. 389 ; Seaman v. Seaman, 12 Wend. 381 ; Stewart v. Ahrenfeldt, 4 Denio 189 ; Fish v. Thomas, 5 Gray 45, 66 Am. Dec. 348 ; Young v. French, 35 Wis. 111; Hewett v. Currier, 63 Wis. 386 , 23 N.

State v. Brown

817 S.E.2d 381 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 14, 2018

Brown v. Bigelow

325 Mass. 4 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 8, 1949

See Damiano v. National Grange Mutual Liability Co. 316 Mass. 626, 630 ; Kenyon v. Chicopee, 320 Mass. 528, 531 . Since the decision in Carter v. Yardley & Co. … Ebers v. General Chemical Co. 310 Mich. 261 (spray for fruit *6 trees). Ellis v. Lindmark, 177 Minn. 390 (oil for poultry). Genesee County Patrons Fire Relief Association v. L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. 263 N.

Brown v. Boyer

202 A.3d 680 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2019

Church v. Brown

29 Barb. 486 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1859

In the case of Brewster v. … This case of Brewster v.

State v. Brown

191 Wash. 2d 1010 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 5, 2018

Cote v. Brown

299 A.D.2d 876 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2002

Anderson v Mott, 199 AD2d 961, 961 ; see Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543, 544 ; Matter of Charles C. v Barbara M., 254 AD2d 778 ). … Bennett, 40 NY2d at 550 ; Matter of Lucore v Lucore, 280 AD2d 959 ; Matter of Parker v Tompkins, 273 AD2d 890 , lv denied 95 NY2d 762 ).

Commonwealth v. Brown

190 A.3d 1133 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 2018

Brown v. State

605 So. 2d 588 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 30, 1992

605 So.2d 588 (1992) Frank BROWN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 91-3063. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 30, 1992. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. … Appellant brings this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging his judgment of conviction and sentence for aggravated battery.

Holloway v. Brown

62 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1980

Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. (1978), 436 U.S. 447 ; Breard v. … Brown, Dowd, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur. Dowd, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for P. Brown, J.

Brown v. State

Superior Court of Delaware · Aug 9, 2019

BROWN, : C.A. No. S16M-11-001 Petitioner, V. STATE OF DELAWARE, Respondent. os mm 3S On = Bo G a 2 ' > RODERICK BROWN , : C.A. No. S16M-12-002 Oo an Us Petitioner, ._. 4 lv Vv. NO STATE OF DELAWARE, Respondent. … Brown, also known as Roderick T.

Brown v. Ripley

119 So. 2d 712 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 7, 1960

119 So.2d 712 (1960) Dwayne BROWN, Appellant, v. Margie RIPLEY, Appellee. No. B-247. District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District. April 7, 1960. … In Till v.

Brown v. Mulanax

808 S.W.2d 718 · Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · Apr 30, 1991

Relators next argue that the objection was not invalidated by the fact that Wayne Brown, instead of his counsel of record, signed the objection. Once again, we agree. In W.C. Turnbow Petroleum Corp. v. … Ingram v. Card Co., 540 S.W.2d 803, 804 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, no writ). Therefore, we find that Wayne Brown’s signing of Relator’s objection did not fatally flaw the objection.

State v. Brown

264 N.C. 191 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1965

This Court said in Alexander v. … State v. Garrett, 263 N.C. 773 , 140 S.E. 2d 315 ; State v. Humphries, 210 N.C. 406 , 186 S.E. 473 .

Hamilton v. Brown

18 Pa. 87 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1851

little does this enter into the remedy, that it is not even necessary that the assignee’s name should appear in the proceedings; nor will the defendant be permitted to controvert the validity of the transfer: Blanchard v. … An assignee need show no right in himself ; it is enough if he show a right in the legal plaintiff, for it is this right alone that can be enforced: Montgomery v. Cook, 6 Watts 238 .

Brown v. Marks

45 Okla. 711 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1915

Harrison v. Penny, 28 Okla. 523 , 114 Pac. 734 ; Ft. Smith & W. R. Co. v. State Nat. Bank, 25 Okla. 128 , 105 Pac. 647 ; First Nat. Bank v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383 , 108 Pac. 748 ; Cooper v. … Laws 1910, sec. 5244; Upton v. Am. Trust Co., 31 Okla. 456 , 122 Pac. 159 ; Ripey v. Art Wall Paper Mill, 27 Okla. 600 , 112 Pac. 1119 ; Hess v. Harrah v, 28 Okla. 627 , 115 Pac. 790 ; Harrison v.