Opinion

Brown v. State

Court
Superior Court of Delaware
Filed
Aug 9, 2019
Status
Published
On the bench
Bradley J.
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AYVLONG

RODERICK T. BROWN, : C.A. No. S16M-11-001

Petitioner,

V.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Respondent. os mm

3S On

= Bo

G a 2

' >

RODERICK BROWN , : C.A. No. S16M-12-002 Oo an

Us

Petitioner, ._. 4

lv

Vv. NO

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Respondent.

ORDER UPON REMAND AFTER APPEAL

WHEREAS, Roderick T. Brown, also known as Roderick T. Mumford ("petitioner"),

filed an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court of this Court’s May 29, 2018, Final Order

regarding the forfeiture of various items of property seized when petitioner was arrested on

charges of drug dealing, money laundering, possession of drug paraphernalia, conspiracy, and

illegal possession of weapons;

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court issued a decision dated July 22, 2019,' wherein it

affirmed in part and reversed in part this Court’s May 29, 2018 Final Order;

WHEREAS, the Supreme Court remanded the matter in order for this Court to enter an

order consistent with the Supreme Court’s July 22, 2019, Opinion;

NOW, THEREFORE, THIS G44 DAY OF AUGUST, 2019, THIS COURT

HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS REGARDING THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF PROPERTY

WHICH WERE AT ISSUE IN THIS ACTION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

SUPREME COURT’S OPINION DATED JULY 22, 2019, IN THAT THE COURT:

1) Deems the 2003 Honda Accord, VIN# 1HGCM55643A099496 to be forfeited

_ because the State established reasonable ground existed to believe that the vehicle was used to

facilitate the sale, transport and/or delivery of illegal drugs and petitioner did not prove

otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence;

2) Orders that the 2003 Honda Accord, VIN# 1HGCM55643A099496 be forfeited to

the State of Delaware;

3) Instructs the Division of Motor Vehicles to transfer title from the previous owner(s)

of the 2003 Honda Accord, VIN# 1HGCM55643A099496 into the name of the State of

Delaware;

4) Grants petitioner’s petition to the extent is seeks the return of the 1972 Cadillac,

VIN# 6D472RQ7754 seized from him;

5) Orders the return to petitioner of the 1972 Cadillac, VIN# 6D472RQ7754;

6) Grants petitioner’s petition to the extent it seeks the return of the 1968 Oldsmobile,

"Brown y. State, — A.3d —, 2019 WL 3295084 (Del. July 22, 2019).

2

VIN# 354698D 113925 seized from him;

7) Orders the return to petitioner of the 1968 Oldsmobile, VIN# 354698D1 13925;

8) Deems the $1,644.00 in United States currency seized from 206 Houston Circle,

Houston Acres, Millsboro, Delaware during the execution of a search warrant to be forfeited

because it was seized near drugs and no one has laid claim to that seized property;”

9) Orders that the $1,644.00 in United States currency be deposited in the Special Law

Enforcement Assistance Fund;

10) Deems the $47,430.00 in United States currency seized from the Millsboro PNC

Bank safe deposit box to be forfeited because the State met its burden of showing it was

forfeitable as proceeds of drug sales and petitioner failed to meet his burden of showing the

seized currency was not forfeitable;

11) Orders that the $47,430.00 in United States currency seized from the Millsboro PNC

Bank safe deposit box be deposited in the Special Law Enforcement Assistance Fund;

12) Grants petitioner’s petition to the extent it seeks the return of $2,153.00 seized from

a bank account found at the PNC Bank in Millsboro, Delaware and $2,022.62 seized from

another account found at the same bank because the State did not establish reasonable ground to

believe the monies in the accounts constituted proceeds of illegal drug sales;? and

*This currency was not subject to the appeal. If the currency has been forfeited, then sections

8) and 9) of this order are moot. If they have not been forfeited pending the outcome of the

appeal, then those monies may be forfeited now in accordance with this order.

These monies were not subject to the appeal and may have been returned already. If these

currencies have been returned to petitioner, then sections 12) and 13) of this order are moot. If

they have not been returned pending the outcome of the appeal, then they must be returned in

accordance with this order.

13) Orders the return to petitioner of the $4,175.62 seized from the two PNC Bank

accounts.

cc: Prothonotary’s Office

Roderick Brown, SBI# 00315954, SCI, P.O. Box 500, Georgetown, DE 19947

Amanda Nyman, Esquire

Nichole Gannett, Esquire

Maria Knoll, Esquire

Kathryn Garrison, Esquire

Danielle Brennan, Esquire

Lisa Schofield, Paralegal

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.