Case law

Ralph v. Brown

3 Watts & Serg. 395 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 15, 1842

Thus in Thellusson v. Smyth, (5 T. … That principle was settled by Baird v. Cochran, ( 4 Serg. & Rawle 397 ), and Nass v. Vanswearingen, (7 Serg. df Rawle 192), as it was in England at the same time, by statute.

Commonwealth v. Brown

721 A.2d 1105 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 1998

Commonwealth v. Mack, 467 Pa. 613 , 359 A.2d 770, 773 (Pa.1976) (quoting Commonwealth v. Marlin, 452 Pa. 380 , 305 A2d 14, 18 (Pa.1973)). … See, e.g., Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

252 Pa. Super. 365 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1977

See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Shields, 247 Pa.Super. 74 , 371 A.2d 1333 (1977). Additionally, a Commonwealth witness, Marshall A. … See Commonwealth v. Reese, 237 Pa.Super. 326 , 352 A.2d 143 (1975).

Davis v. Brown

92 Cal. App. 20 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1928

The instruction, of which *30 the foregoing is a part, is directly contrary to the holding in the cases cited in Brown v. Davis, 84 Cal. App. 180 [ 257 Pac. 877 ]. … In Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages, 68 Cal.

McRae v. Brown

12 La. Ann. 181 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1857

Brown v. State

659 S.W.2d 499 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1983

Paulus v. State, 633 S.W.2d 827, 844 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Od-neal v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 97 , 34 S.W.2d 595 (1931). … We hold that this record is sufficient to link Brown to the robbery and corroborate McLoud’s accomplice testimony. Meyers v. State (supra), cited by Brown, is distinguishable on its facts from the instant case.

Brown v. Haymore

43 Ariz. 466 · Arizona Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1934

Brown, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Arthur S. Haymore, David F. Haymore, and Walter T. Haymore, as executors of the estate of Franklin D. … Arnett v. Hardwick, 27 Ariz. 179 , 231 Pac. 922 ; Burbage v. Jedlicka, 27 Ariz. 426 , 234 Pac. 32 ; Jenkins v. Skelton, 21 Ariz. 663 , 192 Pac. 249 ; Mindlin v. Jones, 26 Ariz. 401 , 226 Pac. 209 .

Elzea v. Brown

59 Pa. Super. 403 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1915

As was said in Estes v. Kauffman, 44 Pa. Superior Ct. 114 , quoting Buffington v. … See Frankenfield v. Freyman, 13 Pa. 56 ; Snyder v. Lingo, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 651 .

Leighton v. Brown

98 Mass. 515 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 15, 1868

Parker v. Simonds, 8 Met. 205 . But it is not admissible in evidence against the present plaintiff, who, as defendant in the replevin action, had no agency in procuring his valuation. Kafer v. Harlow, 5 Allen, 348 . … Swift v. Barnes, 16 Pick. 194 .

Brown v. State

142 Tex. Crim. 405 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1941

The doctrine laid down in Lane v. State, 276 S. W. 712 does not, in our opinion, apply under the facts of this particular case. … Strong v. State, 255 S. W. 432 , Janks v. State, 196 S. W. 182 . From the latter case we quote from Judge Davidson’s reasoning as follows: “This was but a conditional threat.

Brown v. Heymann

62 N.J. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 4, 1972

Shelton College v. State Board of Education, 48 N. J. 501, 518 (1967). Indeed in our State the judiciary has accepted delegations of legislative power which probably exceed federal experience. Massett Building Co. v. … Wayman v. Southard, 10 Wheat. 1, 43 , 6 L. Ed. 253, 263 (1825).

Brown v. Dennis

133 Ga. 791 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Feb 16, 1910

Co. v. Kingsbery, 118 Ga. 254 ( 45 S. E. 235 ). In the present case the demurrers were not such as to compel the refusal of the interlocutory injunction. Nally v. Nally, 74 Ga. 669 (58 Am. R. 447).

Brown v. Lyons

977 F. Supp. 2d 475 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2013

See Brown v. … at any moment.’ ” Brown v.

Harmon v. Brown

58 Ind. 207 · Indiana Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1877

The following authorities, cited by counsel for appellants, are in point upon the main question involved: Pringle v. Dunkley, 14 Sm. & M. 16; Hawkins v. Skeggs, 10 Humph. 31 ; Bennett v. … Robinson, 10 Watts, 348 ; Vance v. Campbell’s Heirs, 1 Dana, 230 . The conclusion at which we have arrived is not in conflict, but in entire harmony, with the ease of Mack v. Mulcahy, 47 Ind. 68 .

Breckinridge v. Brown

9 Iowa 396 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 1859

The petitioner held a promissory note for $700, signed by the defendant, Brown, alone, payable at the banking house of Greene, Weare & Graves, in Marion, Linn county, Iowa; and she also held a mortgage executed by Brown and … It is understood by the writer (but not until recently) that the case of Sands v. Wood, 1 Iowa 363 , has been misapprehended.

Brown v. Bryan

419 S.W.2d 62 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Sep 11, 1967

Brown, Martin v. Turner, Mo., 306 S.W.2d 473, 477 [2-3], and the picture of the interior of the car was a fair and accurate representation of the interior of the car from which Mrs. Brown fell. … v.

Commonwealth v. Brown

354 Mass. 337 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 10, 1968

Brown and a . boy walking together .[¿Curtin called out and Brown stopped. *347 Curtin asked Brown’s name. Brown replied, “Frank Secori.” Brown’s counsel excepted to the admission of any conversation with Brown. … Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U. S. 719, 733 . Commonwealth v. Rogers, 351 Mass. 522, 530 . The Escobedo case did not make Brown’s statements to the police inadmissible.

Brown v. Williams

832 Utah Adv. Rep. 5 · Court of Appeals of Utah · Feb 16, 2017

Brown v. … v.

State v. Brown

389 S.C. 473 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 14, 2010

See State v. … Wilder Corp. v.

Buesgens v. Brown

483 F. Supp. 2d 1357 · United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · Apr 18, 2007

Buesgens v. Donald Ray Tawney, W.D. Texas, C.A. No. 1:07-127 — was dismissed with prejudice on March 19, 2007. Accordingly, the question of inclusion of this action in MDL-1800 proceedings is moot. … Brown, P.C.; Armbrust & Brown, LLP; Grady, Jewett & McCulley, LLP; Megan Goeres; Debi Wehmeier; Mandy Rogers; and Amanda Wilson-Torres. .