Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1986

10,000+ results

3.59s

  • Margaret Cowan, Administratrix of the Estate of Victoria Cooper v. Michael Breen, Town of North Branford, Consolidated-Defendant-Appellant

    352 F.3d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 18, 2003

    If the plaintiff fails to establish a constitutional violation, the qualified immunity inquiry ends and the plaintiff may not recover. Saucier, 533 U.S. at 201, 121 S.Ct. 2151 . … Was the law clearly established? Breen, relying on County of Sacramento v.

    Cited 171 timesPublished
  • Angela Borrell v. Bloomsburg University

    870 F.3d 154 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 30, 2017

    Ficca is entitled to qualified immunity as long as she does not violate a “clearly established” constitutional or federal right. Sharp, 669 F.3d at 159 (quoting Saucier v. … And the district court cases cited cannot clearly establish law for qualified immunity purposes in any event. See Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692 , 709 n.7, 131 S.Ct. 2020 , 179 L.Ed.2d 1118 (2011).

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • Fairman v. Konteh

    361 F. Supp. 2d 704 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 23, 2005

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects “government officials performing discretionary functions ... from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … If so — if the constitutional right was clearly established, the defendant cannot maintain the defense of qualified immunity. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Kenny

    678 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Jul 24, 2009

    to qualified immunity. … issue of qualified immunity.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • CHS Industries, LLC v. United States Customs & Border Protection

    653 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 2009

    . —, 129 S.Ct. 808, 815 , 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009), the Supreme Court gave a succinct overview of the qualified immunity doctrine: The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials “from liability for civil damages … insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Shattuck v. Town of Stratford

    233 F. Supp. 2d 301 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Nov 13, 2002

    Even where the plaintiffs, federal rights and the scope of the official’s permissible conduct are clearly established, the qualified immunity defense protects a government actor if it was objectively reasonable for him to … violate” clearly established constitutional rights).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Woods v. White

    689 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Jul 27, 1988

    The Court has carved out a qualified immunity for government officials whose “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … Therefore, the defense of qualified immunity is not available to defendants. See Forrester v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • William Wentworth Foster v. Mary Basham

    932 F.2d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 16, 1991

    Basham also contended she was entitled to qualified immunity from suit. … Although subjective motive (or intent) is not relevant to the qualified-immunity analysis, the knowledge possessed by the defendant at the time the challenged action occurred is, along with the clearly established law as

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Oscar F. Sanchez Liliana Sanchez v. Charles Swyden, Inspector, Warren K. Hayward, Officer

    131 F.3d 1144 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 13, 1998

    We disagree, go no further than step one of the qualified immunity analysis, and conclude that Sanchez has not shown that the defendants deprived him of a clearly established constitutional right. In Baker v. … CONCLUSION Finding that Sanchez has not shown that he has been deprived of a clearly established constitutional right, we hold that all defendants named in Sanchez’s § 1983 suit are entitled to qualified immunity as a matter

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Rivera v. Fischer

    655 F. Supp. 2d 235 · District Court, W.D. New York · Sep 18, 2009

    Qualified Immunity The moving defendants also argue, in the alternative, that plaintiffs claims against them should be dismissed on the ground of qualified immunity. … “The doctrine of qualified immunity shields government officials from liability for damages resulting from the performance of discretionary official functions if their conduct ‘does not violate clearly established statutory

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Argueta v. Jaradi

    94 F.4th 475 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 29, 2024

    Because of the disputed facts, and the clearly established law preventing officers from using deadly force after incapacitating an individual, the officer was precluded from qualified immunity. Id. at 339. … are material to the application of qualified immunity.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roberto Valderrama v. Officer Carl Rousseau

    780 F.3d 1108 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 16, 2015

    The district court granted their motions in part, but it denied them qualified immunity as to several of the § 1983 claims. The officers now appeal the denial of qualified immunity as to Mr. … clearly established.

    Cited 85 timesPublished
  • R.N. b/n/f of P.N. and R.N. individually v. Rogan

    2017 DNH 044 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 8, 2017

    “Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. Pauly, 137 S. … “To avoid a qualified-immunity defense, [the plaintiff] must show (1) that [the defendant] infracted his federal rights and (2) that these rights were so clearly established that a reasonable officer should have known

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • (PC) Perez v. Smith

    District Court, E.D. California · Oct 4, 2022

    Qualified Immunity 20 The defense of qualified immunity protects “government officials ... from liability for 21 civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate … based on qualified immunity is appropriate.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fields v. Abbott

    652 F.3d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 30, 2011

    Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … due process right that Fields asserts was clearly established when the events in this case took place.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Burdeshaw v. Snell

    350 F. Supp. 2d 944 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 4, 2004

    Federal Claims and Qualified Immunity 1. General Principles Snell has pled the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. … Under the second prong, the court must determine whether the applicable law was clearly established at the time of the challenged action, that is, whether the defendant would have violated a clearly established right under

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Michael Chrestman v. Metro Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tenn.

    Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 16, 2025

    That this case comes to us at the motion-to-dismiss stage complicates our analysis of the clearly established prong of the officers’ qualified-immunity defense. … There, we explained that “dismissing for qualified immunity” on the clearly established prong “is sometimes difficult because the clearly established inquiry may turn on case-specific details that must be fleshed out in discovery

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Radwan v. Manuel

    55 F.4th 101 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 30, 2022

    immunity because such a right was not clearly established at the time of the scholarship’s termination. … In short, the district court concluded that the “lack of clearly established law under the Fraser standard” entitled Coach Tsantiris and AD Manuel to qualified immunity on the First Amendment claim. Id. at 111.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Owl v. Robertson

    79 F. Supp. 2d 1104 · District Court, D. Nebraska · Jan 12, 2000

    Qualified immunity is a question of law. … See, e.g., Otey, 121 F.3d at 1155 (reversing denial of motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds; police chief did not violate clearly established federal rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Casey

    166 F. Supp. 3d 144 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 29, 2016

    Defendant seeks summary judgment' due to qualified immunity as well as on the merits. a. … That right has been clearly established by the U.S. Supreme Court for decades.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.