Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
2.12s
130 Me. 18 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 13, 1931
crosswalk, when the witness saw a car, which proved to be that of defendant, enter Broad Street from Main; heard a crash and saw what looked like a bag of potatoes roll from the right front fender of the car, along its running-board … House v. Ryder, 129 Me., 135, 150 A., 487 . Except for a condition of one leg, which plaintiff terms “nervous,” troubling him some at night, at the time of trial, his injuries seem to have been superficial.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Jul 25, 2019
Thus, in Childs v. … Accord, Thorne v. Bailey, 846 F.2d 241,243 (4th Cir. 1988); State v. Brown, 85 P.3d 109, 113 (Ariz. App. 2004) (both relying on the statutory requirement of a specific intent to harass).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedSuperior Court of Maine · May 30, 2008
~itJ:·~I~,_. ..... , :'"1 T I' Plaintiff, $ , " i v. … Temple v. Inhabitants of City of Belfast, 30 F.Supp. 2d 60, 65 (D. Me. 1998). Under these circumstances, it would be difficult to find the existence of irreparable injury to the plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEastern Maine Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.
225 A.2d 414 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1967
Nebraska Power Co. v. Omaha Ice & Cold Storage, (1946) 147 Neb. 324 , 23 N.W.2d 312 . … Nebraska Power Co. v. Omaha Ice & Cold Storage, supra.
Cited 9 timesPublishedJolovitz v. City of Waterville
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 26, 2003
JOLOVITZ, Appellant/Plaintit v. _ DECISION ON MOTION Str % ams FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF WATERVILLE and CITY OF WATERVILLE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, Appellees / Defendants This matter comes before the court on the motion … In the event the plaintiff cannot enforce a contract, he seeks relief by application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel, citing Chapman v. Bowman, 381 A.2d 1123 (Me. 1978).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBell v. Red Ball Potato Co., Inc.
430 A.2d 835 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 1981
GMAC v. Anacone, 160 Me. 53, 83 , 197 A.2d 506, 524 (1964) (citations omitted). … See Town of South Berwick Planning Board v. Maineland, Inc., Me., 409 A.2d 688, 689 (1980).
Cited 4 timesPublished115 Me. 422 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1916
Garmong v. Henderson, 114 Maine, 75, 90. … Garmong v. Henderson, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTelegraphone Corp. v. Canadian Telegraphone Co.
103 Me. 444 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1908
Barnard v. Lee, 97 Mass. 92 . … Rem. vol. 2, sect. 811; Brown v. Vandergrift, 80 Pa. St. 142.
Cited 10 timesPublishedTHE RUMFORD FREE CATHOLIC LIBRARY v. TOWN OF RUMFORD
District Court, D. Maine · Jun 12, 2020
In addition to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence before the Board, the Plaintiffs contend that the Town employees’ testimony, the Board’s decision to continue the hearing, and the Board’s ultimate determination … Levin v. Commerce Energy, Inc., 560 U.S. 413, 431 (2010) (quoting Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 44 (1971)).
Cited 0 timesUnknown90 F. Supp. 21 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 20, 1950
Givens v. … In further support of his contention that subsection 6(g) is invalid, the petitioner cites section 344 of Naval Courts and Boards 1937, which provides, in part, as follows: “When after the careful inquiry required of the
Cited 5 timesPublishedInhabitants of Rumford v. Inhabitants of Upton
113 Me. 543 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 28, 1915
.; Edwards v. Currier, 43 Maine, 474, 483, 484; Wheelden v. Wilson, 44 Maine, 11, 19; See Knox v. … The selectmen of towns when performing the duties of a registration board, R. S., Chap. 5, Secs. 34-46, like assessors of taxes, are public officers. Their duties are imposed and clearly defined by statute.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAmer Federation of State County & Municipal Employees Council 93 v. City of South Portland
Superior Court of Maine · Sep 5, 2014
STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 93 Plaintiff v. … Maine State Employees Ass'n Local 1989 v. State Department of Corrections, 593 A.2d 650, 653 (Me. 1991).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS v. CALPERS CORPORATE PARTNERS LLC
District Court, D. Maine · Jul 30, 2021
United States v. Vega, 813 F.3d 386, 395 (1st Cir. 2016) (internal quotations omitted); see also United States v. … certain Board members.”
Cited 0 timesUnknown105 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1908
Railroad v. Small, 85 Maine, 462. … Collins v. Chase, 71 Maine, 434; Holmes v. Paris, 75 Maine, 559; Landers v. Smith, 78 Maine, 212; Gray v. County Commissioners, 83 Maine, 429.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSt. Hillaire v. City of Auburn
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2001
See Haynes v. Jackson, 2000 ME 11, {| 12, 744 A.2d 1050, 1053(holding that wife could not represent husband’s interest in lawsuit); see also Boyer v. … Hillaire attempted to retry facts that were tried or could have been tried before the Board. Therefore, the denial of the motion for a trial of the facts was proper. See Baker's Table, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished551 A.2d 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1988
. § 203 (1983), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Piscataquis County; Brown, A.R.J.). We affirm the judgment. … State v. DeLong, 505 A.2d 803, 806 (Me.1986); State v. Quint, 448 A.2d 1353, 1355 (Me.1982).
Cited 12 timesPublishedChauncey W. Clark v. Benton, LLC
2018 ME 99 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2018
Hatch v. … Id. at 655; see also Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606, 607, 609 (Me. 1994).
Cited 2 timesPublishedEstate of Lois W. Smith v. Timothy Salvesen
143 A.3d 780 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 7, 2016
See Brown v. … Addy v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAndroscoggin River Alliance v. Maine Bd. of Envtl. Protection
Superior Court of Maine · Jul 18, 2012
Trust v. … Thacker v. Konover Dev. Corp., 2003 ME 30, ~ 14, 818 A.2d 1013.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedMcPherson v. Penobscot Aerie No. 3177 FOE
Superior Court of Maine · Aug 18, 2016
He further Leslified that the board v t cl a number of times during 2012 on the issue of whether Plaintiff should be retained in her position. These votes resulled in repeated 3 to 2 decisions to retain Plaintiff. … See Chambcrli11 v. 101 Realt Inc. 915 F.2d 777, 784 (1 • Cir. 1990).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna