Case law

State Tax Assessor v. Kraft Groods Group, Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2017

v. State Tax Assessor, No. … Quoting United States v.

Lisa Lesko v. Theodore Stanislaw

86 A.3d 14 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2014

Doucette v. … Brown v. Habrle, 2008 ME 17, ¶ 15,  13 940 A.2d 1091.

King v. Inhabs. of the Town of Phippsburg

Superior Court of Maine · May 15, 2003

Sahl v. Town of York, 2000 ME 180, ¥f 8, 760 A.2d 266, 268 (citations omitted). … See, e.g., Harrington v. City of Biddeford, 583 A.2d 695, 696 (Me. 1990) (standing where owner on same street with one lot separating subject property); Singal v.

Blanchard v. Php Props., Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2005

BLAN CHARD, Plaintiffs V. CV-04-281 PHP PROPERTIES, IN C,, et al, Defendants JASCO COI CC IC IGS ICE i-ek-tok ORDER FOX RIDGE CON DOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and CONSTANCE B. HUTCHINSON, jax 24 Plaintiffs v. … Rogers v, Jackson, 2002 ME 140, | 5, 804 A.2d 379, 380 (citations omitted). We give the party opposing a summary judgment the benefit of any inferences that might reasonably be drawn from the facts presented. Curtis v.

Marston v. Thibodeau

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 31, 2014

In Graffam v. Wray, the Law Court provided that "Disputes over church property ... may be resolved in the civil courts." 437 A.2d 627, 631 (Me. 1981). … Through 2006, the Church operated with a Board of Directors. Votes were held for officers and directors.

Thibeault v. Town of Newfield

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 25, 2004

Petitioner v. … The Superior Court reviews the findings of the Board of Appeals "for an abuse of discretion, error of law, or findings unsupported by substantial evidence in the record." Yusem v.

Peavey v. Nickerson

158 Me. 400 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 8, 1962

Kelley v. School District, 134 Me. 414 , 187 A. 703 ; Knapp v. Swift River School District, 152 Me. 350 , 129 A. (2nd) 790; North Yarmouth v. Skillings, 45 Me. 133 ; 78 C. J. S. Schools and School Districts § 27; 47 Am. … In Elwell v.

Hodge v. Hodge

40 L.R.A. 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 23, 1897

Winship v. Bass, 12 Mass. 198 ; Hobart v. Stone, 10 Pick. 215 ; Ipswich Mfg. Co. v. Story, 5 Met. 310 ; Sigourney v. Wetherell, 6 Met. 553 ; Chapin v. Waters, 110 Mass. 195 ; Choate v. … Sigourney v. Wetherell, supra. In Stevens v.

DiBiase v. Universal Design & Builders, Inc.

473 A.2d 875 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1984

On the day the contract was signed, the Defendant informed the Plaintiff that the Town of Cape Elizabeth Planning Board had given final approval for the subdivision of all 23 lots and that completion of the subdivision plans … Doane v. Pine State Volkswagen, Inc., 377 A.2d 481 , 484 n. 2 (Me.1977); Gallegos v. Stokes, 593 F.2d 372, 375 (10th Cir.1979). But cf. Cushman v. Perkins, 245 A.2d 846 (Me.1968).

Inhabitants of Minot v. Cumberland Co.

28 Me. 121 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1848

Com. v. Carpenter, 3 Mass. R. 26 ; Com. v. Blue Hill Turnpike, 5 Mass. R. 420 ; Com. v. West Boston Bridge, 13 Pick. 195 . … Rutland v. Commissioners of Worcester, 20 Pick. *126 78 .

Porter Holdings, Inc. v. Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 22, 2015

Town ofMad.awaska v. Cayer, 2014 :ME 121, ~ 2, 103 A.3d 547. … The landowners lost their appeal at the Zoning Board of Appeals and appealed to the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 80B.

Dubois Livestock, Inc. v. Town of Arundel

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 9, 2018

"The jurisdiction of a board of appeals 'is a question of law that must be ascertained from an interpretation of municipal statutes and local ordinances." Hathaway v. … See Ryan v.

Trevallion v. Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 8, 2006

The appeal was brought against the Town, whch is a proper party, and against the York Board of Appeals which is not. The Board of Appeals will be dismissed as a defendant. … Brackett v. Town of Rangeley, 2003 ME 109, §§18-25, 831 A.2d 422,428-430.

Houghton v. Davenport

74 Me. 590 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 17, 1883

Bostick v. Keizer, 4 J. J. Marsh, 597; Manley v. Hunt, 1 Ohio, 257; Vandermark v. Jackson, 21 Kan. 263 ; Plant v. Smythe, 45 Cal. 161 ; Ells v. Tonsley, 1 Paige, 280 ; Padgett v. Lawrence, 10 Paige, 170 ; Moger v. … Garrett, 3 Ired. 457 ; Piatt v. Oliver, 2 McLean, 267 ; Cox v. Milner, 23 Ill. 476 ; Savery v. Browning, 18 Iowa, 246 ; Reed v. Ownby, 44 Mo. 204 . Drake Att. 6 ed. § 234.

Riley v. Howes

17 F.2d 647 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 3, 1927

Lapina v. Williams, 232 U. S. 78 , 34 S. Ct. 196 , 58 L. Ed. 515 ; Guimond v. Howes (D. C.) 9 F.(2d) 412 ; Ex parte Rodriguez (D. C.) 15 F.(2d) 878 . … Sotorios Targakis v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 498 .

Millien v. Colby Coll.

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 15, 2003

KU did appeal the Dean’s Hearing Board decision to the Appeals Board. A subcommittee of the Board reviewed KU’s written appeal and decided that she would be entitled to a de novo hearing before the Appeals Board. … However, the discussion of the Federal District Court for the District of Maine in Goodman v. Bowdoin College, 135 F.Supp.2d 40, 54 (D.

Preti v. Ayotte

606 A.2d 780 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1992

The undisputed facts in the present case, more fully set forth in Peoples Heritage Bank v. … Darling v. Augusta Mental Health Inst., 535 A.2d 421, 425 (Me.1987) (citation omitted).

Peter E. Light v. Paola D'Amato

105 A.3d 447 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 2, 2014

Arredondo v. … See Brown v.

Coffey v. Town of Windham

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 16, 2009

The second wrinkle is that, among their other claims, plaintiffs are asserting a claim of equitable estoppel - an issue which administrative boards ordinarily do not have jurisdiction to consider. See Berry v. … E.g., Tarason v. Town of South Benvick, 2005 ME 30 <][15, 868 A.2d 230, 234; Town of Falmouth v. Long, 578 A.2d at 1170.

MCKENNEY v. JACQUES

District Court, D. Maine · Aug 14, 2019

.”); Von Hallcy v. Clements, 519 F. App’x 521, 523 (10th Cir. 2013) (unpublished) (“Von Hallcy cannot state a due process claim based on allegations of an ineffective grievance reporting system.”); Brown v. … App’x 11, 13 (2d Cir. 2012) (“Brown’s argument that he has a federally-protected liberty interest in the state’s compliance with its own prison grievance procedures is meritless.”); Butler v. Brown, 58 F.