Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

3.04s

  • Cruz v. State of Illinois

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 17, 2022

    Qualified immunity “protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statuary or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would … The Court also found the defendants were not entitled to qualified immunity because the delay in assisting the inmate “ran afoul” of the inmate’s clearly established rights under the Eighth Amendment.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • East St. Louis Federation of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis School District No. 189 Financial Oversight Panel

    178 Ill. 2d 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1997

    Section 1B — 20 clearly identifies the nature of the discipline and the parties to be disciplined. … We find no need to discuss any longer a clearly unsupported argument, and we reject it. See 134 Ill. 2d R. 341(e)(7).

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • People v. Matthews

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 26, 1998

    The prosecution in this case chose to use evidence of the defendant's membership in the Blackstones street gang to establish motive. … Clearly the jury chose to rely on witness testimony and other circumstantial evidence to convict defendant. Defendant also challenges Royal's testimony as "unreliable and incredible."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doss v. Bunyan

    262 Ill. 101 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1914

    In order to constitute a dedication, at common law, of lands for a public street, it must be made to clearly and unequivocally appear that the land owner intended to donate his land to the public for a public street and that … the authorities as a public road, was claimed to be erroneous because it was not qualified by a statement that such use must be adverse, exclusive, continuous and under claim of right, but it was held that inasmuch as the

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Industrial Commission

    308 Ill. App. 3d 260 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 13, 1999

    On June 7, 1995, claimant was recalled to work, and she was tested to see if she was qualified to resume her supervisory duties. On June 13, 1995, and at the request of the employer, claimant was examined by Dr. … On review, the Commission’s compensation award should be reversed only if it was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, i.e., where the opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. Durfee v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • 21 Kristin Condominium Ass'n v. Pioneer Engineering & Environmental Services, LLC

    2020 IL App (1st) 191868 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 30, 2020

    “[A] cause of action should not be dismissed pursuant to section 2-615 unless it is clearly apparent that no set of facts can be proved that would entitle the plaintiff to recovery.” Marshall, 222 Ill. 2d at 429. … ¶ 15 For the remaining element of the cause of action, Pioneer argues that its statements cannot qualify as misrepresentations because it only expressed its opinion about the condition of the property.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security

    198 Ill. 2d 380 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2001

    rule of law as applied to the established facts is or is not violated.” … Thus, a driver’s “business” was not established “independently” of AFM.

    Cited 620 timesPublished
  • Pilarski v. Schmidt

    298 Ill. App. 3d 682 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 1, 1998

    The court’s order also established a visitation schedule for Tom, Mandy (Cindy’s daughter, Amanda), and Cindy’s other relatives. William timely appeals. … The law clearly permits such a decision by either the guardian or the surrogate, but only if certain criteria are met.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Gillen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

    349 Ill. App. 3d 779 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 25, 2004

    Clearly admitting that such payments under the Illinois Pension Code differ from those made to employees pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (820 ILCS 305/5 (West 1992)) because no similar lien is created in favor of … 2001) (reason to favor coverage is twofold: to effectuate intent of insured who purchased policy to obtain coverage and to lay burden upon insurance company which, as drafter, could have drafted policy and exceptions more clearly

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Illinois Central Railroad v. County of McLean

    17 Ill. 291 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1855

    Pennsylvania and Massachusetts hold railways exempt from taxation, upon the ground that they are public works, established by public authority, like canals, turnpikes and highways. Inhabitants of Worcester v. … The case before us is not an exemption or immunity from the payment of taxes.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • In re Commitment of Fields

    2014 IL 115542 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2014

    According to respondent, because he “was under the requisite age to qualify for a diagnosis of pedophilia” at the time of the 2000 offense, the State failed to establish that he has a mental disorder. … Unspoken but clearly implied here is that the dispositional hearing was already in progress.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Fantasia v. Kinsella

    956 F. Supp. 1409 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 16, 1997

    The burden of establishing the lack of any genuine issue of material fact rests with the mov-ant. Jakubiec, 844 F.2d at 473 . … Officer Kinsella claims that he is entitled to qualified immunity from liability in connection with the force he used against plaintiff.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Adams County

    179 Ill. App. 3d 752 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 16, 1989

    Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 2—701), requesting the court to establish the rights and legal relations of the parties under certain insurance policies issued to the County from May 1978 through May 1983. … arrest, erroneous service of civil papers, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, assault and battery, libel, slander, defamation of character, violation of property rights, or deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Village of Winfield v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

    176 Ill. 2d 54 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1997

    as the library establishment election. 75 ILCS 5/4 — 3 (West 1992). … The Act clearly contemplates that the library board will determine its own budget.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Inland Rubber Co. v. Industrial Commission

    309 Ill. 43 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1923

    This contention is clearly unsound. The dates of these occasional absences were not fixed by plaintiff in error. … There was clearly no “return” to employment as contemplated by the act. American Glyco Metal Co. v. Industrial Com. 306 Ill. 421 ; Swift & Co. v. Industrial Com. 299 id. 587.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Givens v. City of Chicago

    2021 IL App (1st) 192434 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 28, 2021

    conduct, and further, were based on immunity and legal justification principles. … The supreme court reviewed the comparative fault statute and tort immunity act then in effect and noted that the act clearly insulated cities “against suits for negligence” and “punitive damages,” but would

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lietzow v. Village of Huntley

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 29, 2018

    Qualified Immunity Defendants’ qualified immunity argument raises the same concerns. … clearly established rights.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • People v. Molstad

    101 Ill. 2d 128 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1984

    We turn now to the first issue raised by Molstad: whether the testimony of Wendy Albritton established Molstad’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … The testimony of Molstad’s codefendants clearly qualifies as newly discovered evidence. The affidavits submitted as the basis for a new trial could not have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.

    Cited 228 timesPublished
  • Order Applies to Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC

    921 F. Supp. 2d 903 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 4, 2013

    The Federal Circuit has clearly stated that NoerrPennington does not apply to petitioning activity that, although “ostensibly directed toward influencing governmental action, is a mere sham to cover what is actually nothing … But other assurances, as alleged, do not include this qualifier. (Id. ¶¶ 64-66.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moennich v. City of Chicago

    147 Ill. App. 553 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 22, 1909

    They each examined her a few days prior to the trial, for the sole purpose of qualifying themselves to testify as medical experts. … is clearly traceable to the traumatic injury to the knee suffered as a result of her fall through the defective sidewalk.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.