Case law

Windward Development v. Cummings Road Business Park Association

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 14, 2005

Defendants argue, citing Town of Orrin~ton - v. Pease, 660 A.2d 919, 922 (Me. 1995) and Plannin~Board of Town of Naples v. … However, defendant has offered no Maine authority for the proposition that such deference is required and, in the court's view, Boehner v.

DEMMONS v. ND OTM LLC

District Court, D. Maine · Sep 12, 2023

(quoting Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161, 162 (1859)). … Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161, 162 (1859). In Smedberg v.

Dunn & Theobald, Inc. v. Cohen

402 A.2d 603 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 13, 1979

Texas Industrial Accident Board v. … See legislative history of 1 M.R.S.A. § 402(3) in Moffett v. City of Portland, Me., 400 A.2d 340 , 341 n. 4 (1979).

Moulton v. Moulton

309 A.2d 224 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 5, 1973

Hobbs, 70 Me. 381, 383 (1879); Morrison v. Brown, 84 Me. 82, 83 , 24 A. 672 (1891); Perkins v. Blethen, 107 Me. 443, 446-448 , 78 A. 574 (1911); Mott v. Mott, 107 Me. 481, 483 , 78 A. 900 (1911). … Crowther, Hobbs v. Hobbs and Perkins v.

Boudreau v. Town of Princeton

611 A.2d 78 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 21, 1992

authorization which the court was construing was granted at a special Town meeting on April 11, 1988, when the inhabitants of Princeton voted in favor of Article 37 of a warrant: To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board … Clarke v. Fall River, 219 Mass. 580, 586 , 107 N.E. 419 (1914).

Gray v. Day

109 Me. 492 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 14, 1912

In Perley v. … In Porter v.

Ace Ambulance Service, Inc. v. City of Augusta

337 A.2d 661 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1975

In Hayford v. … See Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351, 370 , 61 A. 785, 793 (1905).

Eeoc v. Dcp Medstream, Lp

608 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 9, 2009

Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 361 (1st Cir.1989); see also EEOC v. Preferred Labor LLC, 2009 WL 415429 , at *4 (D.Mass. … Brown, 891 F.2d at 361 .

Barstow v. Gray

3 Me. 409 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1825

In Egerton v. … Jones v. Barkley 2 Doug. 684. Rawson v. Johnson 1 East 203. Waterhouse v. Skinner 2 Bos. & Pul. 447. West v. Emmons 5 Johns. 179 . Miller v. Drake 1 Caines 45 . Judgment on the verdict.

State v. Leone

581 A.2d 394 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 1990

See, e.g., State v. McLaughlin, 567 A.2d 82, 83 (Me.1989); State v. Brown, 552 A.2d 12, 14 (Me.1988); State v. Whiting, 538 A.2d 300, 301-02 (Me.1988). … See also People v. Lynch, 104 Ill.2d 194 , 83 Ill.Dec. 598 , 470 N.E.2d 1018 (1984); Byrd v.

Murphy v. Goldman

Superior Court of Maine · May 10, 2013

De Novo Review In Stewart v. … Consistent with Stewart v.

Inhabitants of Brunswick v. City of Bath

90 Me. 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 1897

Baker v. Johnson, 41 Maine, 15. … Belcher v. Treat, 61 Maine, 577.

America v. Yamartino

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 16, 2012

Corp. v. … Shostak v. Shostak, 2004 ME 75, ~ 22, 851 A.2d 515 (citing Rosenthal v: Rosenthal, 543 A.2d 34, 353 (Me. 1988)).

Rocque v. Inhabs. of the Town of China

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 3, 2003

ROCQUE, et al., Plaintiffs v. … Ryan v. Town of Camden, 582 A.2d 973, 975 (Me. 1990). “The board’s decision is not wrong because the record is inconsistent or a different conclusion could be drawn from it.” Twigg v.

New Heritage Builders, Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2004

The board’s findings will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence contained in the record. Palesky v. Town of Topsham, 614 A.2d 1307, 1309 (Me. 1992). … Severance v. Choate, 553 A.2d 1288, 1291 (Me. 1987). Here, the Planning Board imposed the Construction Contributions as conditions of the approval of the Development.

Concerned Citizens of Lyman v. Town of Lyman

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 18, 2004

In Lakes Environmental Association v. Town of Naples, 486 A.2d 91, 3 (Me. 1984) the association’s executive director appeared at the local board meeting. … Had the merits of the appeal been reached I would have stated in greater detail that the Board was correct in conducting a de novo hearing rather than acting in a purely appellate capacity. Stewart v.

Lebovitz v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 6, 2003

The Board’s analysis begins with the presumption that the assessor's valuation of the property is valid. Chase v. Town of Machiasport, 1998 ME 260, ] 13, 721 A.2d 636. See also Muirgen Properties, Inc. v. … Yusem v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

795 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1990

V., Francavilla Dep. at 170-71. … Conclusions In General Host Corporation v.

Bennett v. Beaver Ridge Wind

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 24, 2008

See Mills v. … Griffin v. Town of Dedham, 2002 ME 105, ~ 6, 799 A.2d 1239, 1241. "Substantial evidence exists when a reasonable mind would rely on the evidence as sufficient support for a conclusion." Forbes v.

Beals v. Montgomery Ward Co.

150 Me. 360 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 1955

Goddard, 34 Me. 102 ; Veazie v. City of Bangor, 51 Me. 509 ; Norton v. Soule, 75 Me. 385 ; Thurston v. Nutter, 125 Me. 411 ; Levine v. Reynolds, 143 Me. 15 , and Preble v. … Brown v. Rouillard, 117. Me. 55'.