Case law

Carpet, Linoleum, Soft Tile & Resilient Floor Covering Layers, Local Union No. 419 v. National Labor Relations Board

429 F.2d 747 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 1970

National Woodwork Manufacturers v. … Workers, Local 501 v.

Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio, and Retail Clerks International Association, Local 880, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

366 F.2d 642 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 27, 1966

But it argues that the only case in which this Board policy has been reviewed by a court, International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v. … The Board cites two cases for this proposition, International Ladies Garment Workers’ Union v.

Florio v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2022

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 247 (D.C. Cir. 2002). They have not. … See Browning, 292 F.3d at 247–48.

Standard Nut Margarine Co. v. Mellon

1 D.C. 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1934

In Brown v. Rudolph, 58 App. W. C. 116, it was held that the Commissioners of the District were not responsible in damages for their actions in instituting proceedings to have plaintiff declared insane. Yaselli v. … From certain of his decisions an appeal lies to the Board of Tax Appeals, and from that Board to the Circuit Courts of Appeals of the United States.

T.M. v. District of Columbia

961 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

Mot. to Dismiss at 5-6 (citing Unfoldment, Inc. v. DistrictofColumbia, C.A. No. 07-1717(HHK), 2007 WL 3125236 (D.D.C. Oct. 24, 2007), and Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497 (D.D.C. 1977)). … Brown, 75 F.R.D. at 499. The Court has the discretion to dismiss complaints that do not comply with Rule 8. See Ciralsky v. C.lA., 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C.

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2023

Similarly, in Bowen v. … Comm’n v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d 148, 158 (D.D.C. 2010).

James R. Tygrett v. Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia

543 F.2d 840 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 8, 1976

Compare Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960). … Speiser v. Randall, supra note 40 , 357 U.S. at 521, 78 S.Ct. at 1339. . See Ring v. Schlesinger, supra note 31 , 164 U.S.App.D.C. at 28-30 , 502 F.2d at 488-490 . Compare Goldwasser v. Brown, 135 U.S.

Karl F. Ritz v. Civil Aeronautics Board and William F. McKee Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency

373 F.2d 666 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 1967

Petitioner does not question the Board’s power to suspend his license for disciplinary purposes upon proper findings after a full hearing. See Pangburn v. CAB, 311 F.2d 349 (1st Cir. 1962). 3 . … SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194, 196 , 67 S.Ct. 1575 , 91 L.Ed. 1995 (1947). See Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167-168 , 83 S.Ct. 239 , 9 L.Ed.2d 207 (1962); Bell v.

Kelley v. District of Columbia

893 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2012

See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). B. … See Brown v. Sim, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35415 at *11.

Center for Biological Diversity

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Marsh v. Johnson, 263 F.

FRIENDSHIP EDISON PUBLIC v. Smith Ex Rel. LS

429 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2006

Brown & Associates, PLLC, Carol Elaine Burroughs, Office of the Attorney General, Washington, DC, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAMBERTH, District Judge. … Board of Education. The District "has no authority to direct, rescind, overrule, modify, or alter the substantive decision of any hearing officer." Hyde Leadership Pub. Charter Sch. v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2009

See FTC v. … See FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., 548 F.3d at 1034, 1041 (Brown, J.); id. at 1050 (Tatel, J.).

United States v. Emor

850 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2012

United States v. Browne, 505 F.3d at 1281; see United States v. McGinty, 610 F.3d at 1248 (“‘Payment of restitution in no way alters the status of the property as ill-gotten gains. … V.

Federal Trade Commission v. Weyerhaeuser Company

665 F.2d 1072 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 1, 1981

United States v. Brown Shoe Co., 1956 Trade Cas. ¶ 68,244 (E.D.Mo.1956). See also FTC v. PepsiCo, Inc., 477 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1973); United States v. G. … Brown Shoe Co., 1956 Trade Cas. ¶ 68 , 244, at 71,116 (E.D.Mo.1956). . See, e. g., decisions cited in note 24 supra. . But cf. FTC v.

CC1 Ltd. P'ship v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

898 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2018

We cannot second-guess "the ALJ's credibility determinations, as adopted by the Board, unless they are patently insupportable." Gold Coast Rest. Corp. v. NLRB , 995 F.2d 257 , 265 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (quoting NLRB v. … Corp. v. NLRB , 863 F.2d 964 , 967 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (stating that the Board "can infer from falsity of employer's stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful" (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v.

Women's Equity Action League v. Lauro F. Cavazos, Secretary of Education

906 F.2d 742 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1990

Plaintiffs rely as well on Brown v. Califano, 627 F.2d 1221 , 1233 n. 73 (D.C.Cir.1980), which suggested in dictum that “a private individual could challenge in court HEW’s continued funding of a noncomplying district.” … Utley v.

Boone v. Mountainmade Foundation

64 F. Supp. 3d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2014

Pardo-Kronemann v. Donovan, 601 F.3d 599, 607 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455-56 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … Barker’s report to the board. See Halasa v. ITT Educ.

Jenkins v. United States

541 A.2d 1269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 1988

United States, 283 U.S. 308 , *1273 310, 51 S.Ct. 470, 471 , 75 L.Ed. 1054 (1931)); Robinson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. at 269 , 475 F.2d at 380 ; Brown v. … The government relies on interpretations of Brown v.

Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

314 F. Supp. 3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2018

Mem. at 12 (quoting Brown v. Cont'l Airlines, Inc. , 647 F.3d 221 , 226 (5th Cir. 2011) ), and that the Court should not apply the two-step process the Supreme Court adopted in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … ."); Davis v. PBGC , 864 F.Supp.2d at 155 ("[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC's interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions."); Brown v.

Anderson, Sr. v. D.C. Dep't of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 12, 2023

Anderson’s claims as untimely, and the Compensation Review Board (CRB) affirmed. Mr. … v.